Literature DB >> 8213748

A Bayesian approach to measurement error problems in epidemiology using conditional independence models.

S Richardson1, W R Gilks.   

Abstract

Risk factors used in epidemiology are often measured with error which can seriously affect the assessment of the relation between risk factors and disease outcome. In this paper, a Bayesian perspective on measurement error problems in epidemiology is taken and it is shown how the information available in this setting can be structured in terms of conditional independence models. The modeling of common designs used in the presence of measurement error (validation group, repeated measures, ancillary data) is described. The authors indicate how Bayesian estimation can be carried out in these settings using Gibbs sampling, a sampling technique which is being increasingly referred to in statistical and biomedical applications. The method is illustrated by analyzing a design with two measuring instruments and no validation group.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8213748     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  20 in total

1.  Flexible dose-response models for Japanese atomic bomb survivor data: Bayesian estimation and prediction of cancer risk.

Authors:  James Bennett; Mark P Little; Sylvia Richardson
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Binomial regression with a misclassified covariate and outcome.

Authors:  Sheng Luo; Wenyaw Chan; Michelle A Detry; Paul J Massman; Rachelle S Doody
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 3.  Measurement Error and Environmental Epidemiology: a Policy Perspective.

Authors:  Jessie K Edwards; Alexander P Keil
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-03

4.  Lifetime Mortality Risk from Cancer and Circulatory Disease Predicted from the Japanese Atomic Bomb Survivor Life Span Study Data Taking Account of Dose Measurement Error.

Authors:  Mark P Little; David Pawel; Munechika Misumi; Nobuyuki Hamada; Harry M Cullings; Richard Wakeford; Kotaro Ozasa
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  A Bayesian model for estimating the effects of drug use when drug use may be under-reported.

Authors:  Garnett P McMillan; Edward Bedrick; Janet C'deBaca
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  Association of chromosome translocation rate with low dose occupational radiation exposures in U.S. radiologic technologists.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Deukwoo Kwon; Kazataka Doi; Steven L Simon; Dale L Preston; Michele M Doody; Terrence Lee; Jeremy S Miller; Diane M Kampa; Parveen Bhatti; James D Tucker; Martha S Linet; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Bayesian Peer Calibration with Application to Alcohol Use.

Authors:  Miles Q Ott; Joseph W Hogan; Krista J Gile; Crystal Linkletter; Nancy P Barnett
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Maximum likelihood, multiple imputation and regression calibration for measurement error adjustment.

Authors:  Karen Messer; Loki Natarajan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Comparing methods of misclassification correction for studies of adolescent alcohol use.

Authors:  Melvin D Livingston; Brad Cannell; Keith Muller; Kelli A Komro
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.829

10.  Principles of Experimental Design for Big Data Analysis.

Authors:  Christopher C Drovandi; Christopher Holmes; James M McGree; Kerrie Mengersen; Sylvia Richardson; Elizabeth G Ryan
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.901

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.