Literature DB >> 15565453

Flexible dose-response models for Japanese atomic bomb survivor data: Bayesian estimation and prediction of cancer risk.

James Bennett1, Mark P Little, Sylvia Richardson.   

Abstract

Generalised absolute risk models were fitted to the latest Japanese atomic bomb survivor cancer incidence data using Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods, taking account of random errors in the DS86 dose estimates. The resulting uncertainty distributions in the relative risk model parameters were used to derive uncertainties in population cancer risks for a current UK population. Because of evidence for irregularities in the low-dose dose response, flexible dose-response models were used, consisting of a linear-quadratic-exponential model, used to model the high-dose part of the dose response, together with piecewise-linear adjustments for the two lowest dose groups. Following an assumed administered dose of 0.001 Sv, lifetime leukaemia radiation-induced incidence risks were estimated to be 1.11 x 10(-2) Sv(-1) (95% Bayesian CI -0.61, 2.38) using this model. Following an assumed administered dose of 0.001 Sv, lifetime solid cancer radiation-induced incidence risks were calculated to be 7.28 x 10(-2) Sv(-1) (95% Bayesian CI -10.63, 22.10) using this model. Overall, cancer incidence risks predicted by Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods are similar to those derived by classical likelihood-based methods and which form the basis of established estimates of radiation-induced cancer risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15565453     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-004-0258-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  28 in total

1.  Evidence for curvilinearity in the cancer incidence dose-response in the Japanese atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  M P Little; C R Muirhead
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.694

2.  Neutrons confirmed in Nagasaki and at the Army Pulsed Radiation Facility: implications for Hiroshima.

Authors:  T Straume; L J Harris; A A Marchetti; S D Egbert
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  A Bayesian approach to measurement error problems in epidemiology using conditional independence models.

Authors:  S Richardson; W R Gilks
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Some effects of random dose measurement errors on analyses of atomic bomb survivor data.

Authors:  E S Gilbert
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Derivation of low-dose extrapolation factors from analysis of curvature in the cancer incidence dose response in Japanese atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  M P Little; C R Muirhead
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.694

6.  The shape of the cancer mortality dose-response curve for the A-bomb survivors.

Authors:  D A Pierce; M Vaeth
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Curvilinearity in the dose-response curve for cancer in Japanese atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  M P Little; C R Muirhead
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Curvature in the cancer mortality dose response in Japanese atomic bomb survivors: absence of evidence of threshold.

Authors:  M P Little; C R Muirhead
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  Effect of recent changes in atomic bomb survivor dosimetry on cancer mortality risk estimates.

Authors:  Dale L Preston; Donald A Pierce; Yukiko Shimizu; Harry M Cullings; Shoichiro Fujita; Sachiyo Funamoto; Kazunori Kodama
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Threshold and other departures from linear-quadratic curvature in the non-cancer mortality dose-response curve in the Japanese atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  Mark P Little
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-06-19       Impact factor: 1.925

View more
  16 in total

1.  Impact of measurement error in radon exposure on the estimated excess relative risk of lung cancer death in a simulated study based on the French Uranium Miners' Cohort.

Authors:  Rodrigue S Allodji; Klervi Leuraud; Anne C M Thiébaut; Stéphane Henry; Dominique Laurier; Jacques Bénichou
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Levels of naturally occurring gamma radiation measured in British homes and their prediction in particular residences.

Authors:  G M Kendall; R Wakeford; M Athanson; T J Vincent; E J Carter; N P McColl; M P Little
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Solid tumor risks after high doses of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Rainer K Sachs; David J Brenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A new view of radiation-induced cancer: integrating short- and long-term processes. Part II: second cancer risk estimation.

Authors:  Igor Shuryak; Philip Hahnfeldt; Lynn Hlatky; Rainer K Sachs; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Lifetime Mortality Risk from Cancer and Circulatory Disease Predicted from the Japanese Atomic Bomb Survivor Life Span Study Data Taking Account of Dose Measurement Error.

Authors:  Mark P Little; David Pawel; Munechika Misumi; Nobuyuki Hamada; Harry M Cullings; Richard Wakeford; Kotaro Ozasa
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Use of the individual data of the A-bomb survivors for biologically based cancer models.

Authors:  Wolfgang F Heidenreich; H M Cullings
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Association of chromosome translocation rate with low dose occupational radiation exposures in U.S. radiologic technologists.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Deukwoo Kwon; Kazataka Doi; Steven L Simon; Dale L Preston; Michele M Doody; Terrence Lee; Jeremy S Miller; Diane M Kampa; Parveen Bhatti; James D Tucker; Martha S Linet; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Potential impacts of radon, terrestrial gamma and cosmic rays on childhood leukemia in France: a quantitative risk assessment.

Authors:  Olivier Laurent; Sophie Ancelet; David B Richardson; Denis Hémon; Géraldine Ielsch; Claire Demoury; Jacqueline Clavel; Dominique Laurier
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Second cancers after fractionated radiotherapy: stochastic population dynamics effects.

Authors:  Rainer K Sachs; Igor Shuryak; David Brenner; Hatim Fakir; Lynn Hlatky; Philip Hahnfeldt
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2007-08-12       Impact factor: 2.691

10.  Threshold and other departures from linear-quadratic curvature in the non-cancer mortality dose-response curve in the Japanese atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  Mark P Little
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-06-19       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.