Literature DB >> 11554845

Stable chromosome aberrations in atomic bomb survivors: results from 25 years of investigation.

Y Kodama1, D Pawel, N Nakamura, D Preston, T Honda, M Itoh, M Nakano, K Ohtaki, S Funamoto, A A Awa.   

Abstract

Frequencies of stable chromosome aberrations from more than 3,000 atomic bomb survivors were used to examine the nature of the radiation dose response. The end point was the proportion of cells with at least one translocation or inversion detected in Giemsa-stained cultures of approximately 100 lymphocytes per person. The statistical methods allow for both imprecision of individual dose estimates and extra-binomial variation. A highly significant and nonlinear dose response was seen. The shape of the dose response was concave upward for doses below 1.5 Sv but exhibited some leveling off at higher doses. This curvature was similar for the two cities, with a crossover dose (i.e. the ratio of the linear coefficient to the quadratic coefficient) of 1.7 Sv (95% CI 0.9, 4). The low-dose slopes for the two cities differed significantly: 6.6% per Sv (95% CI 5.5, 8.4) in Hiroshima and 3.7% (95% CI 2.6, 4.9) in Nagasaki. This difference was reduced considerably, but not eliminated, when the comparison was limited to people who were exposed in houses or tenements. Nagasaki survivors exposed in factories, as well as people in either city who were outside with little or no shielding, had a lower dose response than those exposed in houses. This suggests that doses for Nagasaki factory worker survivors may be overestimated by the DS86, apparently by about 60%. Even though factory workers constitute about 20% of Nagasaki survivors with dose estimates in the range of 0.5 to 2 Sv, calculations indicate that the dosimetry problems for these people have little impact on cancer risk estimates for Nagasaki.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11554845     DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156[0337:scaiab]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  16 in total

1.  Choice of model and uncertainties of the gamma-ray and neutron dosimetry in relation to the chromosome aberrations data in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Authors:  W Rühm; L Walsh; M Chomentowski
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Effective dose of A-bomb radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki as assessed by chromosomal effectiveness of spectrum energy photons and neutrons.

Authors:  M S Sasaki; S Endo; Y Ejima; I Saito; K Okamura; Y Oka; M Hoshi
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Chromosome Translocations, Inversions and Telomere Length for Retrospective Biodosimetry on Exposed U.S. Atomic Veterans.

Authors:  Miles J McKenna; Erin Robinson; Lynn Taylor; Christopher Tompkins; Michael N Cornforth; Steven L Simon; Susan M Bailey
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Cytogenetic effects of radioiodine therapy: a 20-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Gordon K Livingston; Igor K Khvostunov; Eric Gregoire; Joan-Francesc Barquinero; Lin Shi; Satoshi Tashiro
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Cytogenetic effects induced by accelerated carbon ions with shielding.

Authors:  Z Z Wang; W J Li; B Q Wang; B T Zhang; J Z Xing; X G Jing; B R Dang; W Wei; W X Zhao
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Joint nonparametric correction estimator for excess relative risk regression in survival analysis with exposure measurement error.

Authors:  Ching-Yun Wang; Harry Cullings; Xiao Song; Kenneth J Kopecky
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 4.488

7.  Increased frequency of chromosome translocations associated with diagnostic x-ray examinations.

Authors:  Parveen Bhatti; Michele M Doody; Dale L Preston; Diane Kampa; Elaine Ron; Robert W Weinstock; Steven Simon; Alan A Edwards; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Association of chromosome translocation rate with low dose occupational radiation exposures in U.S. radiologic technologists.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Deukwoo Kwon; Kazataka Doi; Steven L Simon; Dale L Preston; Michele M Doody; Terrence Lee; Jeremy S Miller; Diane M Kampa; Parveen Bhatti; James D Tucker; Martha S Linet; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Current use and future needs of biodosimetry in studies of long-term health risk following radiation exposure.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; André Bouville; Ruth Kleinerman
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  Routine diagnostic X-ray examinations and increased frequency of chromosome translocations among U.S. radiologic technologists.

Authors:  Alice J Sigurdson; Parveen Bhatti; Dale L Preston; Michele Morin Doody; Diane Kampa; Bruce H Alexander; Dayton Petibone; Lee C Yong; Alan A Edwards; Elaine Ron; James D Tucker
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.