Literature DB >> 24910514

Encoding the target or the plausible preview word? The nature of the plausibility preview benefit in reading Chinese.

Jinmian Yang1, Nan Li2, Suiping Wang2, Timothy J Slattery3, Keith Rayner4.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that a plausible preview word can facilitate the processing of a target word as compared to an implausible preview word (a plausibility preview benefit effect) when reading Chinese (Yang, Wang, Tong, & Rayner, 2012; Yang, 2013). Regarding the nature of this effect, it is possible that readers processed the meaning of the plausible preview word and did not actually encode the target word (given that the parafoveal preview word lies close to the fovea). The current experiment examined this possibility with three conditions wherein readers received a preview of a target word that was either (1) identical to the target word (identical preview), (2) a plausible continuation of the pre-target text, but the post-target text in the sentence was incompatible with it (initially plausible preview), or (3) not a plausible continuation of the pre-target text, nor compatible with the post-target text (implausible preview). Gaze durations on target words were longer in the initially plausible condition than the identical condition. Overall, the results showed a typical preview benefit, but also implied that readers did not encode the initially plausible preview. Also, a plausibility preview benefit was replicated: gaze durations were longer with implausible previews than the initially plausible ones. Furthermore, late eye movement measures did not reveal differences between the initially plausible and the implausible preview conditions, which argues against the possibility of misreading the plausible preview word as the target word. In sum, these results suggest that a plausible preview word provides benefit in processing the target word as compared to an implausible preview word, and this benefit is only present in early but not late eye movement measures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chinese; eye movements; plausibility preview benefit

Year:  2014        PMID: 24910514      PMCID: PMC4043386          DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2014.890689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis cogn        ISSN: 1350-6285


  25 in total

Review 1.  Parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Bernhard Angele; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Eye movements and parafoveal word processing in reading Chinese.

Authors:  Miao-Hsuan Yen; Jie-Li Tsai; Ovid J-L Tzeng; Daisy L Hung
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-07

3.  Semantic preview benefit during reading.

Authors:  Sven Hohenstein; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The time course of semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Jinmian Yang; Suiping Wang; Hsuan-Chih Chen; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-12

5.  Word misperception, the neighbor frequency effect, and the role of sentence context: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Timothy J Slattery
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; D A Balota; A Pollatsek
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1986-12

7.  Early parafoveal processing in reading Chinese sentences.

Authors:  Miao-Hsuan Yen; Ralph Radach; Ovid J-L Tzeng; Daisy L Hung; Jie-Li Tsai
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2009-03-12

8.  Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Synonyms Provide Semantic Preview Benefit in English.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  Semantic and plausibility effects on preview benefit during eye fixations in Chinese reading.

Authors:  Jinmian Yang; Suiping Wang; Xiuhong Tong; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2010-11-18
View more
  8 in total

1.  Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Parafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading: Independent effects of plausibility and orthographic relatedness.

Authors:  Aaron Veldre; Sally Andrews
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

Review 3.  Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Bernhard Angele
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

4.  Event-related brain potentials reveal how multiple aspects of semantic processing unfold across parafoveal and foveal vision during sentence reading.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Mallory C Stites; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Semantic and plausibility preview benefit effects in English: Evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Annie Jia
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Word's Predictability Can Modulate Semantic Preview Effect in High-Constraint Sentences.

Authors:  Liling Xu; Sui Liu; Suiping Wang; Dongxia Sun; Nan Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-23

7.  Integration of Sentence-Level Semantic Information in Parafovea: Evidence from the RSVP-Flanker Paradigm.

Authors:  Wenjia Zhang; Nan Li; Xiaoyue Wang; Suiping Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Parafoveal processing of orthographic, morphological, and semantic information during reading Arabic: A boundary paradigm investigation.

Authors:  Ehab W Hermena; Eida J Juma; Maryam AlJassmi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.