Literature DB >> 31274200

Event-related brain potentials reveal how multiple aspects of semantic processing unfold across parafoveal and foveal vision during sentence reading.

Brennan R Payne1,2,3, Mallory C Stites4, Kara D Federmeier5,6,7.   

Abstract

Recent event-related brain potential (ERP) experiments have demonstrated parafoveal N400 expectancy and congruity effects, showing that semantic information can be accessed from words in parafoveal vision (a conclusion also supported by some eye-tracking work). At the same time, it is unclear how higher-order integrative aspects of language comprehension unfold across the visual field during reading. In the current study, we recorded ERPs in a parafoveal flanker paradigm, while readers were instructed to read passively for comprehension or to judge the plausibility of sentences in which target words varied in their semantic expectancy and congruity. We directly replicated prior work showing graded N400 effects for parafoveal viewing, which are then not duplicated when the target words are processed foveally. Critically, although N400 effects were not modulated by task goals, a posteriorly distributed late positive component thought to reflect semantic integration processes was observed to semantic incongruities only in the plausibility judgment task. However, this effect was observed at a considerable delay, appearing only after words had moved into foveal vision. Our findings thus suggest that semantic access can be initiated in parafoveal vision, whereas central foveal vision may be necessary to enact higher-order (and task-dependent) integrative processing.
© 2019 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERPs; N400; parafoveal processing; reading; semantic memory

Year:  2019        PMID: 31274200      PMCID: PMC6879358          DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  73 in total

Review 1.  The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: comparisons to other models.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Semantic preview benefit in eye movements during reading: A parafoveal fast-priming study.

Authors:  Sven Hohenstein; Jochen Laubrock; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Trans-saccadic repetition priming: ERPs reveal on-line integration of information across words.

Authors:  Jonathan Grainger; Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Parafoveal versus foveal N400s dissociate spreading activation from contextual fit.

Authors:  Franziska Kretzschmar; Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky; Matthias Schlesewsky
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink.

Authors:  E K Vogel; S J Luck; K L Shapiro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Encoding the target or the plausible preview word? The nature of the plausibility preview benefit in reading Chinese.

Authors:  Jinmian Yang; Nan Li; Suiping Wang; Timothy J Slattery; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-01-01

7.  The N400 as a function of the level of processing.

Authors:  D J Chwilla; C M Brown; P Hagoort
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  The effects of semantic priming and work repetition on event-related potentials.

Authors:  M D Rugg
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Semantic and plausibility preview benefit effects in English: Evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Annie Jia
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing.

Authors:  Harm Brouwer; Matthew W Crocker; Noortje J Venhuizen; John C J Hoeks
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-12-21
View more
  2 in total

1.  Connecting and considering: Electrophysiology provides insights into comprehension.

Authors:  Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Vocabulary Repetition Following Multisensory Instruction Is Ineffective on L2 Sentence Comprehension: Evidence From the N400.

Authors:  Reza Pishghadam; Haniyeh Jajarmi; Shaghayegh Shayesteh; Azin Khodaverdi; Hossein Nassaji
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.