Literature DB >> 24888221

No difference between standard and high flexion cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised controlled study.

Hans Robert Springorum1, Günther Maderbacher, Benjamin Craiovan, Christian Lüring, Clemens Baier, Joachim Grifka, Armin Keshmiri.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective, randomised, double-blind study was to test the hypotheses that patients with high-flexion total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have (1) a wider/greater range of motion (ROM) post-operatively and (2) higher levels of knee society score (KSS) and WOMAC score post-operatively compared to standard TKA.
METHODS: In this study, 28 high flexion with 31 standard TKAs were compared. We measured ROM, pre-operatively, on day 3, 7, 28, and after 6 and 36 months post-operatively as well as KSS and WOMAC score pre-operatively, on day 28 and after 6 and 36 months post-operatively.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between both groups with regard to the target parameters. The mean ROM was 113° (range 80°-140°, SD 13.4°) in the control group (standard TKA) and 117° (range 90°-140°, SD 12.3) in the study group (high-flexion TKA) at 36 months follow-up [p = not significant (n.s.)]. The KSS pre-operatively was 38.2 (range 8-64, SD 15.8) in the control group and 45.9 (range 8-74, SD 16.0) in the study group (n.s.) increasing to 157.6 in the control group and 156.7 in the study group (p = n.s) at 36 months follow-up.
CONCLUSION: This study could not confirm significant benefits of high-flexion TKA compared to standard TKA with regard to ROM and higher levels of KSS and WOMAC score. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24888221     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3082-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  26 in total

Review 1.  Activities of daily living in non-Western cultures: range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants.

Authors:  S J Mulholland; U P Wyss
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Knee joint kinematics in gait and other functional activities measured using flexible electrogoniometry: how much knee motion is sufficient for normal daily life?

Authors:  P J Rowe; C M Myles; C Walker; R Nutton
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 3.  Does the new generation of high-flex knee prostheses improve the post-operative range of movement?: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  R Mehin; R S Burnett; P M A Brasher
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-10

4.  [Does the NexGen LPS flex mobile knee prosthesis offer advantages compared to the NexGen LPS?--a comparison of clinical and radiological results].

Authors:  D Wohlrab; J Ditl; R Herrschelmann; U Schietsch; W Hein; R Hube
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct

5.  A randomized, prospective study of primary total knee components designed for increased flexion.

Authors:  Steven H Weeden; Robert Schmidt
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  High-flexion implants in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rajiv Gandhi; Peggy Tso; J Roderick Davey; Nizar N Mahomed
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Kawamura; R B Bourne
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.601

8.  Validation study of a computerized version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities VA3.0 Osteoarthritis Index.

Authors:  N Bellamy; J Campbell; J Stevens; L Pilch; C Stewart; Z Mahmood
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.666

9.  Clinical outcomes in high flexion total knee arthroplasty were not superior to standard posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. A multicenter, prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  George N Guild; Sameh A Labib
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 10.  High-flexion posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis: is it worth the hype?

Authors:  Sanjeev Jain; Aditya Chandrashekhar Pathak; Kalaivanan Kanniyan; Sourabh Kulkarni; Sandeep Tawar; Prashant Mane
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-29
View more
  5 in total

1.  Is high flexion total knee arthroplasty a rewarding procedure? An updated meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ting Lei; Hu Qian; Long Hua; Guilherme Moreira de Abreu E Silva; Yihe Hu; Pengfei Lei
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Target range of motion for rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hirotaka Mutsuzaki; Ryoko Takeuchi; Yuki Mataki; Yasuyoshi Wadano
Journal:  J Rural Med       Date:  2017-05-24

3.  Surgical training does not affect operative time and outcome in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Markus Weber; Michael Worlicek; Florian Voellner; Michael Woerner; Achim Benditz; Daniela Weber; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Midterm functional recovery of Total knee arthroplasty patients compared between the ATTUNE knee system and the press fit condylar (PFC) SIGMA knee system.

Authors:  Ekasame Vanitcharoenkul; Aasis Unnanuntana
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Revision Surgery in Total Joint Replacement Is Cost-Intensive.

Authors:  Markus Weber; Tobias Renkawitz; Florian Voellner; Benjamin Craiovan; Felix Greimel; Michael Worlicek; Joachim Grifka; Achim Benditz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.