Literature DB >> 16224678

[Does the NexGen LPS flex mobile knee prosthesis offer advantages compared to the NexGen LPS?--a comparison of clinical and radiological results].

D Wohlrab1, J Ditl, R Herrschelmann, U Schietsch, W Hein, R Hube.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Under experimental conditions, mobile bearing knee prostheses have several advantages. The optimized congruence of the tibio-femoral joint surface allows a knee flexion of more than 120 degrees without creating instability or increase of wear. AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the results of a prospective randomized study after implantation of the mobile bearing knee prosthesis NexGen LPS Flex with the results of the fixed bearing knee prosthesis NexGen LPS.
METHODS: Sixty patients underwent a total knee replacement (30 patients with NexGen LPS Flex mobile, 30 patients with NexGen LPS) via a mid vastus approach. All implants were cemented (Palacos) including the patella resurfacing. We evaluated the Hospital for Special Surgery Score (HSS) and different radiological parameters (maximal flexion, positioning of the implants, leg axis) preoperatively as well as 3 months and 3 years (34.6 +/- 7.3 months) postoperatively.
RESULTS: After 3 months the NexGen LPS Flex group showed better results in the scores for pain, range of motion (122.5 degrees vs. 107.33 degrees ) as well as the overall HSS (87.21 vs. 82.68 points) compared to the NexGen LPS group. Three years postoperatively there were no differences in all scores between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The theoretical advantages of the mobile bearing knee prostheses were reflected in the clinical results only partly and temporarily. Probably the results of long-term follow-ups will show characteristic advantages or disadvantages of mobile bearing knee prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16224678     DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-836828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb        ISSN: 0044-3220


  7 in total

1.  No difference between standard and high flexion cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Hans Robert Springorum; Günther Maderbacher; Benjamin Craiovan; Christian Lüring; Clemens Baier; Joachim Grifka; Armin Keshmiri
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The role of polyethylene design on postoperative TKA flexion: an analysis of 1534 cases.

Authors:  Richard W McCalden; Steven J MacDonald; Kory D J Charron; Robert B Bourne; Douglas D Naudie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  High-flexion posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis: is it worth the hype?

Authors:  Sanjeev Jain; Aditya Chandrashekhar Pathak; Kalaivanan Kanniyan; Sourabh Kulkarni; Sandeep Tawar; Prashant Mane
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-29

4.  One year after navigated total knee replacement, no clinically relevant difference found between fixed bearing and mobile bearing knee replacement in a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Frank Lampe; Anusch Sufi-Siavach; Karina E Bohlen; Ekkehard Hille; Sebastian P M Dries
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2011-05-27

Review 5.  No difference between mobile and fixed bearing in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Nicola Maffulli; Francesco Cuozzo; Marco Pilone; Karen Elsner; Jörg Eschweiler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.114

6.  Early outcome of TKA with a medial pivot fixed-bearing prosthesis is worse than with a PFC mobile-bearing prosthesis.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Sung-Hwan Yoon; Jun-Shik Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The High Flex Total Knee Arthroplasty-Higher Incidence of Aseptic Loosening and No Benefit in Comparison to Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum 16-Years Follow-Up Results.

Authors:  Florian Radetzki; Alexander Zeh; Karl-Stefan Delank; David Wohlrab
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 1.251

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.