Literature DB >> 9415651

Validation study of a computerized version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities VA3.0 Osteoarthritis Index.

N Bellamy1, J Campbell, J Stevens, L Pilch, C Stewart, Z Mahmood.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the validity and feasibility of a computerized version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index.
METHODS: Thirty patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee completed both a paper and a computerized version of WOMAC in random order. The visual analog scaled version of WOMAC, VA3.0, was used. We studied criterion validity by comparing the paper and computerized versions.
RESULTS: All patients completed the computerized version without undue difficulty. Criterion validity, based on aggregated subscale scores, was excellent: Pain, ICC = 0.89, Stiffness, ICC = 0.87, Physical Function, ICC = 0.95.
CONCLUSION: The computerized version of WOMAC VA3.0 is a valid alternative to the paper version.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9415651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  48 in total

1.  Second-generation extensively porous-coated THA stems at minimum 10-year followup.

Authors:  David W Hennessy; John J Callaghan; Steve S Liu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Two year follow-up comparing computer assisted versus freehand TKR on joint stability, muscular function and patients satisfaction.

Authors:  C Lüring; F Oczipka; L Perlick; M Tingart; J Grifka; H Bäthis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Conducting clinical trials over the internet: feasibility study.

Authors:  Tim McAlindon; Margaret Formica; Karim Kabbara; Michael LaValley; Melissa Lehmer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-30

4.  Cementing acetabular liners into secure cementless shells for polyethylene wear provides durable mid-term fixation.

Authors:  John J Callaghan; David W Hennessy; Steve S Liu; Kirsten E Goetz; Anneliese D Heiner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Two-year follow-up on joint stability and muscular function comparing rotating versus fixed bearing TKR.

Authors:  C Luring; H Bathis; F Oczipka; C Trepte; H Lufen; L Perlick; J Grifka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  A five to seven year follow-up comparing computer-assisted vs freehand TKR with regard to clinical parameters.

Authors:  C Lüring; M Kauper; H Bäthis; L Perlick; J Beckmann; J Grifka; M Tingart; B Rath
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Cerebral microembolization during primary total hip arthroplasty and neuropsychologic outcome: a pilot study.

Authors:  Rahul V Patel; Jan Stygall; Jane Harrington; Stanton P Newman; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Early functional outcome after lateral UKA is sensitive to postoperative lower limb alignment.

Authors:  J P van der List; H Chawla; J C Villa; H A Zuiderbaan; A D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  The visual analogue WOMAC 3.0 scale--internal validity and responsiveness of the VAS version.

Authors:  Paula Kersten; Peter J White; Alan Tennant
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years: excellent ten to 16-year follow-up results with a HA-coated stem.

Authors:  H Wangen; P Lereim; I Holm; R Gunderson; O Reikerås
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.