Literature DB >> 24876618

Continuous glucose monitoring in newborn infants: how do errors in calibration measurements affect detected hypoglycemia?

Felicity Thomas1, Mathew Signal1, Deborah L Harris2, Philip J Weston3, Jane E Harding4, Geoffrey M Shaw5, J Geoffrey Chase6.   

Abstract

Neonatal hypoglycemia is common and can cause serious brain injury. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) could improve hypoglycemia detection, while reducing blood glucose (BG) measurements. Calibration algorithms use BG measurements to convert sensor signals into CGM data. Thus, inaccuracies in calibration BG measurements directly affect CGM values and any metrics calculated from them. The aim was to quantify the effect of timing delays and calibration BG measurement errors on hypoglycemia metrics in newborn infants. Data from 155 babies were used. Two timing and 3 BG meter error models (Abbott Optium Xceed, Roche Accu-Chek Inform II, Nova Statstrip) were created using empirical data. Monte-Carlo methods were employed, and each simulation was run 1000 times. Each set of patient data in each simulation had randomly selected timing and/or measurement error added to BG measurements before CGM data were calibrated. The number of hypoglycemic events, duration of hypoglycemia, and hypoglycemic index were then calculated using the CGM data and compared to baseline values. Timing error alone had little effect on hypoglycemia metrics, but measurement error caused substantial variation. Abbott results underreported the number of hypoglycemic events by up to 8 and Roche overreported by up to 4 where the original number reported was 2. Nova results were closest to baseline. Similar trends were observed in the other hypoglycemia metrics. Errors in blood glucose concentration measurements used for calibration of CGM devices can have a clinically important impact on detection of hypoglycemia. If CGM devices are going to be used for assessing hypoglycemia it is important to understand of the impact of these errors on CGM data.
© 2014 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  algorithm; continuous glucose monitor; hypoglycemia; intensive care unit; neonatal; recalibration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24876618      PMCID: PMC4455445          DOI: 10.1177/1932296814524857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  27 in total

1.  Continuous glucose monitoring: real-time algorithms for calibration, filtering, and alarms.

Authors:  B Wayne Bequette
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-03-01

Review 2.  Amperometric glucose sensors: sources of error and potential benefit of redundancy.

Authors:  Jessica R Castle; W Kenneth Ward
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-01-01

Review 3.  Factors affecting blood glucose monitoring: sources of errors in measurement.

Authors:  Barry H Ginsberg
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

4.  Evaluation of nursing work effort and perceptions about blood glucose testing in tight glycemic control.

Authors:  Daleen Aragon
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.228

5.  Hypoglycemia detection in critical care using continuous glucose monitors: an in silico proof of concept analysis.

Authors:  Christopher G Pretty; J Geoffrey Chase; Aaron Le Compte; Geoffrey M Shaw; Matthew Signal
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-01-01

6.  Accuracy of bedside capillary blood glucose measurements in critically ill patients.

Authors:  C Dana Critchell; Vincent Savarese; Amy Callahan; Christine Aboud; Serge Jabbour; Paul Marik
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Reference ranges for hematocrit and blood hemoglobin concentration during the neonatal period: data from a multihospital health care system.

Authors:  Jeffery Jopling; Erick Henry; Susan E Wiedmeier; Robert D Christensen
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Accuracy of bedside glucose measurement from three glucometers in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Cornelia W E Hoedemaekers; Jacqueline M T Klein Gunnewiek; Marieke A Prinsen; Johannes L Willems; Johannes G Van der Hoeven
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Assessing glucose monitor performance--a standardized approach.

Authors:  John J Mahoney; John M Ellison
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.118

10.  Evaluation of "point of care" devices in the measurement of low blood glucose in neonatal practice.

Authors:  H T Ho; W K Y Yeung; B W Y Young
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.747

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Toward a Framework for Outcome-Based Analytical Performance Specifications: A Methodology Review of Indirect Methods for Evaluating the Impact of Measurement Uncertainty on Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Alison F Smith; Bethany Shinkins; Peter S Hall; Claire T Hulme; Mike P Messenger
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  The impact of measurement frequency on the domains of glycemic control in the critically ill--a Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  James S Krinsley; David E Bruns; James C Boyd
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-01-06

3.  Consensus Statement on Inpatient Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Amisha Wallia; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Robert J Rushakoff; David C Klonoff; Daniel J Rubin; Sherita Hill Golden; Curtiss B Cook; Bithika Thompson
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-04-21

Review 4.  Performance of Cleared Blood Glucose Monitors.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Priya Prahalad
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-08

5.  Analysis of "Use of Blood Glucose Meters Featuring Color Range Indicators Improves Glycemic Control and Patients With Diabetes in Comparison to Blood Glucose Meters Without Color (ACCENTS Study)".

Authors:  Andjela T Drincic
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-08-10

Review 6.  Management of Type 1 Diabetes in the Hospital Setting.

Authors:  Carlos E Mendez; Guillermo E Umpierrez
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 7.  An Overview of Safety Issues on Use of Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in the Hospital.

Authors:  Bithika Thompson; Melinda Leighton; Mary Korytkowski; Curtiss B Cook
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 8.  Next-generation, personalised, model-based critical care medicine: a state-of-the art review of in silico virtual patient models, methods, and cohorts, and how to validation them.

Authors:  J Geoffrey Chase; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jennifer L Dickson; Antoine Pironet; Yeong Shiong Chiew; Christopher G Pretty; Geoffrey M Shaw; Balazs Benyo; Knut Moeller; Soroush Safaei; Merryn Tawhai; Peter Hunter; Thomas Desaive
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 9.  Continuous glucose monitoring in neonates: a review.

Authors:  Christopher J D McKinlay; J Geoffrey Chase; Jennifer Dickson; Deborah L Harris; Jane M Alsweiler; Jane E Harding
Journal:  Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol       Date:  2017-10-17

10.  Assessment of the performance of blood glucose monitoring systems for monitoring dysglycaemia in neonatal patients.

Authors:  Yin Ba; Jin Xu; Lin Yuan; Haiyan Zhu; Yipei Yang; Mei Mei Lam; Shulian Zhang; Mili Xiao; Jiayin Xu; Rong Zhang; Chao Chen
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2018-10-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.