Literature DB >> 25568143

The impact of measurement frequency on the domains of glycemic control in the critically ill--a Monte Carlo simulation.

James S Krinsley1, David E Bruns2, James C Boyd2.   

Abstract

The role of blood glucose (BG) measurement frequency on the domains of glycemic control is not well defined. This Monte Carlo mathematical simulation of glycemic control in a cohort of critically ill patients modeled sets of 100 patients with simulated BG-measuring devices having 5 levels of measurement imprecision, using 2 published insulin infusion protocols, for 200 hours, with 3 different BG-measurement intervals-15 minutes (Q15'), 1 hour (Q1h), and 2 hours (Q2h)-resulting in 1,100,000 BG measurements for 3000 simulated patients. The model varied insulin sensitivity, initial BG value and rate of gluconeogenesis. The primary outcomes included rates of hyperglycemia (BG > 180 mg/dL), hypoglycemia (BG < 70 and 40 mg/dL), proportion of patients with elevated glucose variability (within-patient coefficient of variation [CV] > 20%), and time in range (BG ranges 80-150 mg/dL and 80-180 mg/dL). Percentages of hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia at both thresholds, and patients with elevated glucose variability as well as time outside glycemic targets were substantially higher in simulations with measurement interval Q2h compared to those with measurement interval Q1h and moderately higher in simulations with Q1h than in those with Q15'. Higher measurement frequency mitigated the deleterious effect of high measurement imprecision, defined as CV ≥ 15%. This Monte Carlo simulation suggests that glycemic control in critically ill patients is more optimal with a BG measurement interval no longer than 1h, with further benefit obtained with use of measurement interval of 15'. These findings have important implications for the development of glycemic control standards.
© 2015 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monte Carlo simulation; blood glucose; critically ill; glucose variability; hyperglycemia; hypoglycemia; monitoring frequency; time in range

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25568143      PMCID: PMC4604588          DOI: 10.1177/1932296814566507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  48 in total

1.  Continuous glucose monitoring during critical care.

Authors:  Silvio E Inzucchi; Mikhail Kosiborod
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Clinical assessment of the accuracy of blood glucose measurement devices.

Authors:  Andreas Pfützner; Michael Mitri; Petra B Musholt; Daniela Sachsenheimer; Marcus Borchert; Andrew Yap; Thomas Forst
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.580

3.  Comparison of the accuracy of the HemoCue glucose analyzer with the Yellow Springs Instrument glucose oxidase analyzer, particularly in hypoglycemia.

Authors:  Alexander D M Stork; Hans Kemperman; D Willem Erkelens; Thiemo F Veneman
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.664

4.  Intensive versus conventional insulin therapy: a randomized controlled trial in medical and surgical critically ill patients.

Authors:  Yaseen M Arabi; Ousama C Dabbagh; Hani M Tamim; Abdullah A Al-Shimemeri; Ziad A Memish; Samir H Haddad; Sofia J Syed; Hema R Giridhar; Asgar H Rishu; Mouhamad O Al-Daker; Salim H Kahoul; Riette J Britts; Maram H Sakkijha
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Implementation of a safe and effective insulin infusion protocol in a medical intensive care unit.

Authors:  Philip A Goldberg; Mark D Siegel; Robert S Sherwin; Joshua I Halickman; Michelle Lee; Valerie A Bailey; Sandy L Lee; James D Dziura; Silvio E Inzucchi
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Glucose variability is associated with intensive care unit mortality.

Authors:  Jeroen Hermanides; Titia M Vriesendorp; Robert J Bosman; Durk F Zandstra; Joost B Hoekstra; J Hans Devries
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Variability of insulin sensitivity during the first 4 days of critical illness: implications for tight glycemic control.

Authors:  Christopher G Pretty; Aaron J Le Compte; J Geoffrey Chase; Geoffrey M Shaw; Jean-Charles Preiser; Sophie Penning; Thomas Desaive
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.925

8.  Mild hypoglycemia is independently associated with increased mortality in the critically ill.

Authors:  James S Krinsley; Marcus J Schultz; Peter E Spronk; Robin E Harmsen; Floris van Braam Houckgeest; Johannes P van der Sluijs; Christian Mélot; Jean Charles Preiser
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  The impact of early hypoglycemia and blood glucose variability on outcome in critical illness.

Authors:  Sean M Bagshaw; Rinaldo Bellomo; Michael J Jacka; Moritoki Egi; Graeme K Hart; Carol George
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Accuracy and limitations of continuous glucose monitoring using spectroscopy in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Roosmarijn Tm van Hooijdonk; Tineke Winters; Johan C Fischer; Edmée C van Dongen-Lases; James S Krinsley; Jean-Charles Preiser; Marcus J Schultz
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 6.925

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Toward a Framework for Outcome-Based Analytical Performance Specifications: A Methodology Review of Indirect Methods for Evaluating the Impact of Measurement Uncertainty on Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Alison F Smith; Bethany Shinkins; Peter S Hall; Claire T Hulme; Mike P Messenger
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Comparison of Subcutaneous Regular Insulin and Lispro Insulin in Diabetics Receiving Continuous Nutrition: A Numerical Study.

Authors:  Mamie C Stull; Richard J Strilka; Michael S Clemens; Scott B Armen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-30

3.  Subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring in critically ill patients during insulin therapy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan Yao; Yi-He Zhao; Wen-He Zheng; Hui-Bin Huang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.940

4.  Fifteen-minute Frequency of Glucose Measurements and the Use of Threshold Alarms: Impact on Mitigating Dysglycemia in Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Grant V Bochicchio; Stanley A Nasraway; Laura J Moore; Anthony P Furnary; Eden A Nohra; Kelly M Bochicchio; James C Boyd; David I Bruns; Irl B Hirsch; Jean-Charles Preiser; James S Krinsley
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-19

5.  Round Table Discussion on Inpatient Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring at the International Hospital Diabetes Meeting.

Authors:  Amisha Wallia; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Stanley A Nasraway; David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-22

6.  Inadequate Reporting of Analytical Characteristics of Biomarkers Used in Clinical Research: A Threat to Interpretation and Replication of Study Findings.

Authors:  Qian Sun; Kerry J Welsh; David E Bruns; David B Sacks; Zhen Zhao
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Time in blood glucose range 70 to 140 mg/dl >80% is strongly associated with increased survival in non-diabetic critically ill adults.

Authors:  James S Krinsley; Jean-Charles Preiser
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 8.  Continuous glucose monitoring in the ICU: clinical considerations and consensus.

Authors:  James S Krinsley; J Geoffrey Chase; Jan Gunst; Johan Martensson; Marcus J Schultz; Fabio S Taccone; Jan Wernerman; Julien Bohe; Christophe De Block; Thomas Desaive; Pierre Kalfon; Jean-Charles Preiser
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  Glycaemic control targets after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeroen Hermanides; Mark P Plummer; Mark Finnis; Adam M Deane; Jonathan P Coles; David K Menon
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Simulation and qualitative analysis of glucose variability, mean glucose, and hypoglycemia after subcutaneous insulin therapy for stress hyperglycemia.

Authors:  Richard J Strilka; Mamie C Stull; Michael S Clemens; Stewart C McCaver; Scott B Armen
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 2.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.