Literature DB >> 16823014

Evaluation of nursing work effort and perceptions about blood glucose testing in tight glycemic control.

Daleen Aragon1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tight glycemic control is important in critically ill patients and involves insulin infusions and monitoring of blood glucose levels. Hourly measurements of blood glucose levels and adjustments of intravenous insulin doses require additional work by nurses.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the nursing work incurred with and nursing perceptions about tight glycemic control and blood glucose monitoring.
METHODS: A variety of intensive care units were studied. Surveys were used to gain information about nurses' perceptions. Time-in-motion observations were used to determine the time taken to measure blood glucose levels and adjust insulin doses.
RESULTS: Nurses thought that tight glycemic control was important and that the work associated with it was substantial. Nurses thought that easier and automated forms of blood glucose monitoring are needed. They preferred using an arterial catheter to obtain blood samples to avoid excessive finger sticks. The total number of blood glucose measurements was 77 954. The mean time taken for hourly blood glucose monitoring and adjustment of insulin doses was 4.72 minutes. The estimated costs of time spent on glycemic control during a 1-year period were $182 488 for nurses' salaries and $58 500 for supplies.
CONCLUSIONS: Although most nurses endorse tight glycemic control, the work associated with it is burdensome and costly. Because up to 2 hours might be required for tight glycemic control for a single patient in a 24-hour period, the costs in time and money are high. Easier clinical methods for monitoring blood glucose levels are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16823014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  77 in total

1.  Stochastic targeted (STAR) glycemic control: design, safety, and performance.

Authors:  Alicia Evans; Aaron Le Compte; Chia-Siong Tan; Logan Ward; James Steel; Christopher G Pretty; Sophie Penning; Fatanah Suhaimi; Geoffrey M Shaw; Thomas Desaive; J Geoffrey Chase
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-01-01

2.  Interface design and human factors considerations for model-based tight glycemic control in critical care.

Authors:  Logan Ward; James Steel; Aaron Le Compte; Alicia Evans; Chia-Siong Tan; Sophie Penning; Geoffrey M Shaw; Thomas Desaive; J Geoffrey Chase
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-01-01

Review 3.  "One more thing to think about…" Cognitive burden experienced by intensive care unit nurses when implementing a tight glucose control protocol.

Authors:  Lit Soo Ng; Martha A Q Curley
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-01-01

4.  Data entry errors and design for model-based tight glycemic control in critical care.

Authors:  Logan Ward; James Steel; Aaron Le Compte; Alicia Evans; Chia-Siong Tan; Sophie Penning; Geoffrey M Shaw; Thomas Desaive; J Geoffrey Chase
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-01-01

5.  Glucose measurement of intensive care unit patient plasma samples using a fixed-wavelength mid-infrared spectroscopy system.

Authors:  James Krinsley; Kelly Bochicchio; Christopher Calentine; Grant Bochicchio
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

6.  Impact of shock requiring norepinephrine on the accuracy and reliability of subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Ulrike Holzinger; Joanna Warszawska; Reinhard Kitzberger; Harald Herkner; Philipp G H Metnitz; Christian Madl
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Accuracy of subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring in critically ill adults: improved sensor performance with enhanced calibrations.

Authors:  Lalantha Leelarathna; Shane W English; Hood Thabit; Karen Caldwell; Janet M Allen; Kavita Kumareswaran; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Marianna Nodale; Ahmad Haidar; Mark L Evans; Rowan Burnstein; Roman Hovorka
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  Barriers and facilitators to the use of computer-based intensive insulin therapy.

Authors:  Thomas R Campion; Lemuel R Waitman; Nancy M Lorenzi; Addison K May; Cynthia S Gadd
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.046

9.  A prospective randomised multi-centre controlled trial on tight glucose control by intensive insulin therapy in adult intensive care units: the Glucontrol study.

Authors:  Jean-Charles Preiser; Philippe Devos; Sergio Ruiz-Santana; Christian Mélot; Djillali Annane; Johan Groeneveld; Gaetano Iapichino; Xavier Leverve; Gérard Nitenberg; Pierre Singer; Jan Wernerman; Michael Joannidis; Adela Stecher; René Chioléro
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Accuracy and reliability of a subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring device in critically ill patients.

Authors:  S Rijkenberg; S C van Steen; J H DeVries; P H J van der Voort
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.502

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.