Literature DB >> 24846186

Bone mineral (31)P and matrix-bound water densities measured by solid-state (31)P and (1)H MRI.

Alan C Seifert1, Cheng Li, Chamith S Rajapakse, Mahdieh Bashoor-Zadeh, Yusuf A Bhagat, Alexander C Wright, Babette S Zemel, Antonios Zavaliangos, Felix W Wehrli.   

Abstract

Bone is a composite material consisting of mineral and hydrated collagen fractions. MRI of bone is challenging because of extremely short transverse relaxation times, but solid-state imaging sequences exist that can acquire the short-lived signal from bone tissue. Previous work to quantify bone density via MRI used powerful experimental scanners. This work seeks to establish the feasibility of MRI-based measurement on clinical scanners of bone mineral and collagen-bound water densities, the latter as a surrogate of matrix density, and to examine the associations of these parameters with porosity and donors' age. Mineral and matrix-bound water images of reference phantoms and cortical bone from 16 human donors, aged 27-97 years, were acquired by zero-echo-time 31-phosphorus ((31)P) and 1-hydrogen ((1)H) MRI on whole body 7T and 3T scanners, respectively. Images were corrected for relaxation and RF inhomogeneity to obtain density maps. Cortical porosity was measured by micro-computed tomography (μCT), and apparent mineral density by peripheral quantitative CT (pQCT). MRI-derived densities were compared to X-ray-based measurements by least-squares regression. Mean bone mineral (31)P density was 6.74 ± 1.22 mol/l (corresponding to 1129 ± 204 mg/cc mineral), and mean bound water (1)H density was 31.3 ± 4.2 mol/l (corresponding to 28.3 ± 3.7 %v/v). Both (31)P and bound water (BW) densities were correlated negatively with porosity ((31)P: R(2) = 0.32, p < 0.005; BW: R(2) = 0.63, p < 0.0005) and age ((31)P: R(2) = 0.39, p < 0.05; BW: R(2) = 0.70, p < 0.0001), and positively with pQCT density ((31)P: R(2) = 0.46, p < 0.05; BW: R(2) = 0.50, p < 0.005). In contrast, the bone mineralization ratio (expressed here as the ratio of (31)P density to bound water density), which is proportional to true bone mineralization, was found to be uncorrelated with porosity, age or pQCT density. This work establishes the feasibility of image-based quantification of bone mineral and bound water densities using clinical hardware.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; bone; bone matrix density; bone mineral density; ultra-short echo time MRI; zero echo time MRI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24846186      PMCID: PMC4077547          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  44 in total

1.  Viscoelastic dissipation in compact bone: implications for stress-induced fluid flow in bone.

Authors:  E Garner; R Lakes; T Lee; C Swan; R Brand
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Comparison of optimized soft-tissue suppression schemes for ultrashort echo time MRI.

Authors:  Cheng Li; Jeremy F Magland; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad; Hee Kwon Song; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  The water content of bone. I. The mass of water, inorganic crystals, organic matrix, and CO2 space components in a unit volume of the dog bone.

Authors:  S R ELLIOTT; R A ROBINSON
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1957-01       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Designing long-T2 suppression pulses for ultrashort echo time imaging.

Authors:  Peder E Z Larson; Paul T Gurney; Krishna Nayak; Garry E Gold; John M Pauly; Dwight G Nishimura
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Magnetic susceptibility measurement of insoluble solids by NMR: magnetic susceptibility of bone.

Authors:  J A Hopkins; F W Wehrli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Clinically compatible MRI strategies for discriminating bound and pore water in cortical bone.

Authors:  R Adam Horch; Daniel F Gochberg; Jeffry S Nyman; Mark D Does
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Characterization of 1H NMR signal in human cortical bone for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R Adam Horch; Jeffry S Nyman; Daniel F Gochberg; Richard D Dortch; Mark D Does
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  A unique protonated phosphate group in bone mineral not present in synthetic calcium phosphates. Identification by phosphorus-31 solid state NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Y Wu; M J Glimcher; C Rey; J L Ackerman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-12-09       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Human imaging of phosphorus in cortical and trabecular bone in vivo.

Authors:  Matthew D Robson; Peter D Gatehouse; Graeme M Bydder; Stefan Neubauer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  In vivo MRI of submillisecond T(2) species with two-dimensional and three-dimensional radial sequences and applications to the measurement of cortical bone water.

Authors:  Aranee Techawiboonwong; Hee Kwon Song; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.044

View more
  20 in total

1.  Rapid dual-RF, dual-echo, 3D ultrashort echo time craniofacial imaging: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Hyunyeol Lee; Xia Zhao; Hee Kwon Song; Rosaline Zhang; Scott P Bartlett; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Hard Tissues and Hard Tissue Engineered Bio-substitutes.

Authors:  Simone Mastrogiacomo; Weiqiang Dou; John A Jansen; X Frank Walboomers
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Non-destructive NIR spectral imaging assessment of bone water: Comparison to MRI measurements.

Authors:  Chamith S Rajapakse; Mugdha V Padalkar; Hee Jin Yang; Mikayel Ispiryan; Nancy Pleshko
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Pulse sequence programming in a dynamic visual environment: SequenceTree.

Authors:  Jeremy F Magland; Cheng Li; Michael C Langham; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  Advances in imaging approaches to fracture risk evaluation.

Authors:  Mary Kate Manhard; Jeffry S Nyman; Mark D Does
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 7.012

Review 6.  MRI assessment of bone structure and microarchitecture.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Sean Boone; Dimitri Martel; Chamith S Rajapakse; Robert S Hallyburton; Mitch Valko; Stephen Honig; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Impact of gradient imperfections on bone water quantification with UTE MRI.

Authors:  Xia Zhao; Hyunyeol Lee; Hee Kwon Song; Cheng-Chieh Cheng; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  The Behavior of Water in Collagen and Hydroxyapatite Sites of Cortical Bone: Fracture, Mechanical Wear, and Load Bearing Studies.

Authors:  Farhana Gul-E-Noor; Chandan Singh; Antonios Papaioannou; Neeraj Sinha; Gregory S Boutis
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.126

9.  UTE imaging with simultaneous water and fat signal suppression using a time-efficient multispoke inversion recovery pulse sequence.

Authors:  Michael Carl; Graeme M Bydder; Jiang Du
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Solid-State Quantitative (1)H and (31)P MRI of Cortical Bone in Humans.

Authors:  Alan C Seifert; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.