Literature DB >> 28165650

MRI assessment of bone structure and microarchitecture.

Gregory Chang1, Sean Boone1, Dimitri Martel1, Chamith S Rajapakse2, Robert S Hallyburton1, Mitch Valko1, Stephen Honig3, Ravinder R Regatte1.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a disease of weak bone and increased fracture risk caused by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue. The standard-of-care test used to diagnose osteoporosis, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) estimation of areal bone mineral density (BMD), has limitations as a tool to identify patients at risk for fracture and as a tool to monitor therapy response. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment of bone structure and microarchitecture has been proposed as another method to assess bone quality and fracture risk in vivo. MRI is advantageous because it is noninvasive, does not require ionizing radiation, and can evaluate both cortical and trabecular bone. In this review article, we summarize and discuss research progress on MRI of bone structure and microarchitecture over the last decade, focusing on in vivo translational studies. Single-center, in vivo studies have provided some evidence for the added value of MRI as a biomarker of fracture risk or treatment response. Larger, prospective, multicenter studies are needed in the future to validate the results of these initial translational studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 Technical Efficacy: Stage 5 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;46:323-337.
© 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone mineral density (BMD); bone quality; dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA); finite element analysis (FEA); fragility fractures; osteoporosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28165650      PMCID: PMC5690546          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  137 in total

1.  Finite element analysis applied to 3-T MR imaging of proximal femur microarchitecture: lower bone strength in patients with fragility fractures compared with control subjects.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Stephen Honig; Ryan Brown; Cem M Deniz; Kenneth A Egol; James S Babb; Ravinder R Regatte; Chamith S Rajapakse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Quantification of vertebral bone marrow fat content using 3 Tesla MR spectroscopy: reproducibility, vertebral variation, and applications in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Li; Daniel Kuo; Anne L Schafer; Anne Porzig; Thomas M Link; Dennis Black; Ann V Schwartz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  O Johnell; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Digital topological analysis of in vivo magnetic resonance microimages of trabecular bone reveals structural implications of osteoporosis.

Authors:  F W Wehrli; B R Gomberg; P K Saha; H K Song; S N Hwang; P J Snyder
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Precision of ¹⁸F-fluoride PET skeletal kinetic studies in the assessment of bone metabolism.

Authors:  Y Al-Beyatti; M Siddique; M L Frost; I Fogelman; G M Blake
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  S C E Schuit; M van der Klift; A E A M Weel; C E D H de Laet; H Burger; E Seeman; A Hofman; A G Uitterlinden; J P T M van Leeuwen; H A P Pols
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Potential diagnostic role of the MRI-derived internal magnetic field gradient in calcaneus cancellous bone for evaluating postmenopausal osteoporosis at 3T.

Authors:  Mauro Rebuzzi; Vincenzo Vinicola; Franco Taggi; Umberto Sabatini; Felix W Wehrli; Silvia Capuani
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  Clinical imaging of bone microarchitecture with HR-pQCT.

Authors:  Kyle K Nishiyama; Elizabeth Shane
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.096

9.  Phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance imaging of hydroxyapatite: a model for bone imaging.

Authors:  J L Ackerman; D P Raleigh; M J Glimcher
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Solid-State Quantitative (1)H and (31)P MRI of Cortical Bone in Humans.

Authors:  Alan C Seifert; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.096

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  MR Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System Using Ultrahigh Field (7T) MR Imaging.

Authors:  Hamza Alizai; Gregory Chang; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2018-10

Review 2.  Optoacoustic imaging in endocrinology and metabolism.

Authors:  Angelos Karlas; Miguel A Pleitez; Juan Aguirre; Vasilis Ntziachristos
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 3.  Micro-Finite Element Analysis of the Proximal Femur on the Basis of High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Images.

Authors:  Chamith S Rajapakse; Gregory Chang
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  MRI-based assessment of proximal femur strength compared to mechanical testing.

Authors:  Chamith S Rajapakse; Alexander R Farid; Daniel C Kargilis; Brandon C Jones; Jae S Lee; Alyssa J Johncola; Alexandra S Batzdorf; Snehal S Shetye; Michael W Hast; Gregory Chang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  What is changed in the diagnosis of osteoporosis: the role of radiologists.

Authors:  Giuseppe Guglielmi; Rosario Francesco Balzano; Xiaoguang Cheng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

6.  Changes in bone microarchitecture following parathyroidectomy in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  Irene Ruderman; Chamith S Rajapakse; Winnie Xu; Sisi Tang; Patricia L Robertson; Nigel D Toussaint
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2021-08-24

7.  Peonidin-3-O-glucoside and cyanidin increase osteoblast differentiation and reduce RANKL-induced bone resorption in transgenic medaka.

Authors:  Zhitao Ren; Nishikant A Raut; Temitope O Lawal; Shital R Patel; Simon M Lee; Gail B Mahady
Journal:  Phytother Res       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 5.878

Review 8.  The use of bone mineral density measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and peripheral quantitative computed microtomography in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Martin Jannot; Fabrice Mac-Way; Vanessa Lapierre; Marie-Helene Lafage-Proust
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.902

9.  Fracture prediction and prevention: will newer technologies help?

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Stephen Honig
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 10.  Fracture prediction, imaging and screening in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Nicholas R Fuggle; Elizabeth M Curtis; Kate A Ward; Nicholas C Harvey; Elaine M Dennison; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 43.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.