Literature DB >> 22294340

Clinically compatible MRI strategies for discriminating bound and pore water in cortical bone.

R Adam Horch1, Daniel F Gochberg, Jeffry S Nyman, Mark D Does.   

Abstract

Advances in modern magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pulse sequences have enabled clinically practical cortical bone imaging. Human cortical bone is known to contain a distribution of T(1) and T(2) components attributed to bound and pore water, although clinical imaging approaches have yet to discriminate bound from pore water based on their relaxation properties. Herein, two clinically compatible MRI strategies are proposed for selectively imaging either bound or pore water by utilizing differences in their T(1)s and T(2)s. The strategies are validated in a population of ex vivo human cortical bones, and estimates obtained for bound and pore water are compared to bone mechanical properties. Results show that the two MRI strategies provide good estimates of bound and pore water that correlate to bone mechanical properties. As such, the strategies for bound and pore water discrimination shown herein should provide diagnostically useful tools for assessing bone fracture risk, once applied to clinical MRI.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22294340      PMCID: PMC3357454          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  30 in total

Review 1.  Bone poroelasticity.

Authors:  S C Cowin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Diffusion of exchangeable water in cortical bone studied by nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Maria A Fernández-Seara; Suzanne L Wehrli; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Quantifying cortical bone water in vivo by three-dimensional ultra-short echo-time MRI.

Authors:  Hamidreza Saligheh Rad; Shing Chun Benny Lam; Jeremy F Magland; Henry Ong; Cheng Li; Hee Kwon Song; James Love; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Qualitative and quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging of cortical bone.

Authors:  Jiang Du; Michael Carl; Mark Bydder; Atsushi Takahashi; Christine B Chung; Graeme M Bydder
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Designing long-T2 suppression pulses for ultrashort echo time imaging.

Authors:  Peder E Z Larson; Paul T Gurney; Krishna Nayak; Garry E Gold; John M Pauly; Dwight G Nishimura
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Magnetic susceptibility measurement of insoluble solids by NMR: magnetic susceptibility of bone.

Authors:  J A Hopkins; F W Wehrli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Characterization of 1H NMR signal in human cortical bone for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R Adam Horch; Jeffry S Nyman; Daniel F Gochberg; Richard D Dortch; Mark D Does
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Dual inversion recovery, ultrashort echo time (DIR UTE) imaging: creating high contrast for short-T(2) species.

Authors:  Jiang Du; Atsushi M Takahashi; Won C Bae; Christine B Chung; Graeme M Bydder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Water content measured by proton-deuteron exchange NMR predicts bone mineral density and mechanical properties.

Authors:  Maria A Fernández-Seara; Suzanne L Wehrli; Masaya Takahashi; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-12-16       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Non-invasive predictors of human cortical bone mechanical properties: T(2)-discriminated H NMR compared with high resolution X-ray.

Authors:  R Adam Horch; Daniel F Gochberg; Jeffry S Nyman; Mark D Does
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  58 in total

1.  Rapid dual-RF, dual-echo, 3D ultrashort echo time craniofacial imaging: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Hyunyeol Lee; Xia Zhao; Hee Kwon Song; Rosaline Zhang; Scott P Bartlett; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Hard Tissues and Hard Tissue Engineered Bio-substitutes.

Authors:  Simone Mastrogiacomo; Weiqiang Dou; John A Jansen; X Frank Walboomers
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Magnetization transfer imaging of cortical bone in vivo using a zero echo time sequence in mice at 4.7 T: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Magda Marcon; Markus Weiger; Daniel Keller; Moritz C Wurnig; Christian Eberhardt; Daniel Eberli; Andreas Boss
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 4.  Ultrashort time to echo magnetic resonance techniques for the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  Palanan Siriwanarangsun; Sheronda Statum; Reni Biswas; Won C Bae; Christine B Chung
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

5.  Identifying Novel Clinical Surrogates to Assess Human Bone Fracture Toughness.

Authors:  Mathilde Granke; Alexander J Makowski; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Mark D Does; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Deuterium nuclear magnetic resonance unambiguously quantifies pore and collagen-bound water in cortical bone.

Authors:  Henry H Ong; Alexander C Wright; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Feasibility of using an inversion-recovery ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequence for quantification of glenoid bone loss.

Authors:  Ya-Jun Ma; Justin West; Amin Nazaran; Xin Cheng; Heinz Hoenecke; Jiang Du; Eric Y Chang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Cortical bone water concentration: dependence of MR imaging measures on age and pore volume fraction.

Authors:  Cheng Li; Alan C Seifert; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad; Yusuf A Bhagat; Chamith S Rajapakse; Wenli Sun; Shing Chun Benny Lam; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Bone cell-independent benefits of raloxifene on the skeleton: a novel mechanism for improving bone material properties.

Authors:  Maxime A Gallant; Drew M Brown; Max Hammond; Joseph M Wallace; Jiang Du; Alix C Deymier-Black; Jonathan D Almer; Stuart R Stock; Matthew R Allen; David B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Water residing in small ultrastructural spaces plays a critical role in the mechanical behavior of bone.

Authors:  Jitin Samuel; Debarshi Sinha; John Cong-Gui Zhao; Xiaodu Wang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.