Literature DB >> 27048472

Solid-State Quantitative (1)H and (31)P MRI of Cortical Bone in Humans.

Alan C Seifert1, Felix W Wehrli2.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a pivotal role for assessment of the musculoskeletal system. It is currently the clinical modality of choice for evaluation of soft tissues including cartilage, ligaments, tendons, muscle, and bone marrow. By comparison, the study of calcified tissue by MRI is still in its infancy. In this article, we review the potential of the modality for assessment of cortical bone properties known to be affected in degenerative bone disease, with focus on parameters related to matrix and mineral densities, and porosity, by means of emerging solid-state (1)H and (31)P MRI techniques. In contrast to soft tissues, the MRI signal in calcified tissues has very short lifetime, on the order of 100 μs to a few milliseconds, demanding customized imaging approaches that allow capture of the signal almost immediately after excitation. The technologies described are suited for quantitatively imaging human cortical bone in specimens as well as in vivo in patients on standard clinical imagers, yielding either concentrations in absolute units when measured against a reference standard, or more simply, in the form of surrogate biomarkers. The two major water fractions in cortical bone are those of collagen-bound and pore water occurring at an approximately 3:1 ratio. Collagen-bound water density provides a direct quantitative measure of osteoid density. While at an earlier stage of development, quantification of mineral phosphorus by (31)P MRI yields mineral density and, together with knowledge of matrix density, should allow quantification of the degree of bone mineralization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone mineral density; Bone water; Cortical bone; Solid-state MRI; UTE; ZTE

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27048472      PMCID: PMC4860104          DOI: 10.1007/s11914-016-0307-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep        ISSN: 1544-1873            Impact factor:   5.096


  65 in total

1.  Changes in bone remodeling rate influence the degree of mineralization of bone.

Authors:  G Boivin; P J Meunier
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.417

2.  Quantification of the degree of mineralization of bone in three dimensions using synchrotron radiation microtomography.

Authors:  Stefania Nuzzo; Françoise Peyrin; Peter Cloetens; José Baruchel; Georges Boivin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Determination of cortical bone porosity and pore size distribution using a low field pulsed NMR approach.

Authors:  Xiaodu Wang; Qingwen Ni
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  In Vivo Quantitative MR Imaging of Bound and Pore Water in Cortical Bone.

Authors:  Mary Kate Manhard; R Adam Horch; Daniel F Gochberg; Jeffry S Nyman; Mark D Does
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  A Surrogate Measure of Cortical Bone Matrix Density by Long T2 -Suppressed MRI.

Authors:  Alan C Seifert; Cheng Li; Suzanne L Wehrli; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Volumetric Cortical Bone Porosity Assessment with MR Imaging: Validation and Clinical Feasibility.

Authors:  Chamith S Rajapakse; Mahdieh Bashoor-Zadeh; Cheng Li; Wenli Sun; Alexander C Wright; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Density of organic matrix of native mineralized bone measured by water- and fat-suppressed proton projection MRI.

Authors:  Yaotang Wu; Jerome L Ackerman; David A Chesler; Lila Graham; Yan Wang; Melvin J Glimcher
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  The degree of mineralization is a determinant of bone strength: a study on human calcanei.

Authors:  H Follet; G Boivin; C Rumelhart; P J Meunier
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Water content measured by proton-deuteron exchange NMR predicts bone mineral density and mechanical properties.

Authors:  Maria A Fernández-Seara; Suzanne L Wehrli; Masaya Takahashi; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-12-16       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Measurement of cortical porosity of the proximal femur improves identification of women with nonvertebral fragility fractures.

Authors:  L A Ahmed; R Shigdel; R M Joakimsen; O P Eldevik; E F Eriksen; A Ghasem-Zadeh; Y Bala; R Zebaze; E Seeman; Å Bjørnerem
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative imaging methods in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ling Oei; Fjorda Koromani; Fernando Rivadeneira; M Carola Zillikens; Edwin H G Oei
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

Review 2.  Advances in imaging approaches to fracture risk evaluation.

Authors:  Mary Kate Manhard; Jeffry S Nyman; Mark D Does
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 7.012

3.  Collagen proton fraction from ultrashort echo time magnetization transfer (UTE-MT) MRI modelling correlates significantly with cortical bone porosity measured with micro-computed tomography (μCT).

Authors:  Saeed Jerban; Yajun Ma; Lidi Wan; Adam C Searleman; Hyungseok Jang; Robert L Sah; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 4.  MRI assessment of bone structure and microarchitecture.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Sean Boone; Dimitri Martel; Chamith S Rajapakse; Robert S Hallyburton; Mitch Valko; Stephen Honig; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging (UTE-MRI) of cortical bone correlates well with histomorphometric assessment of bone microstructure.

Authors:  Saeed Jerban; Yajun Ma; Jonathan H Wong; Amin Nazaran; Adam Searleman; Lidi Wan; Judith Williams; Jiang Du; Eric Y Chang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Significant correlations between human cortical bone mineral density and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) obtained with 3D Cones ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging (UTE-MRI).

Authors:  Saeed Jerban; Xing Lu; Hyungseok Jang; Yajun Ma; Behnam Namiranian; Nicole Le; Ying Li; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Volumetric mapping of bound and pore water as well as collagen protons in cortical bone using 3D ultrashort echo time cones MR imaging techniques.

Authors:  Saeed Jerban; Yajun Ma; Liang Li; Hyungseok Jang; Lidi Wan; Tan Guo; Adam Searleman; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  Dual-Mode Tumor Imaging Using Probes That Are Responsive to Hypoxia-Induced Pathological Conditions.

Authors:  S A Amali S Subasinghe; Robia G Pautler; Md Abul Hassan Samee; Jason T Yustein; Matthew J Allen
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30

9.  Self-Navigated Three-Dimensional Ultrashort Echo Time Technique for Motion-Corrected Skull MRI.

Authors:  Hyunyeol Lee; Xia Zhao; Hee Kwon Song; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Technical Note: A methodology for improved accuracy in stopping power estimation using MRI and CT.

Authors:  Jessica E Scholey; Dharshan Chandramohan; Tarun Naren; William Liu; Peder Eric Zufall Larson; Atchar Sudhyadhom
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.