Michael Carl1, Graeme M Bydder2, Jiang Du2. 1. GE Healthcare, University of California, San Diego, California, USA. 2. Radiology Department, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The long repetition time and inversion time with inversion recovery preparation ultrashort echo time (UTE) often causes prohibitively long scan times. We present an optimized method for long T2 signal suppression in which several k-space spokes are acquired after each inversion preparation. THEORY AND METHODS: Using Bloch equations the sequence parameters such as TI and flip angle were optimized to suppress the long T2 water and fat signals and to maximize short T2 contrast. Volunteer imaging was performed on a healthy male volunteer. Inversion recovery preparation was performed using a Silver-Hoult adiabatic inversion pulse together with a three-dimensional (3D) UTE (3D Cones) acquisition. RESULTS: The theoretical signal curves generally agreed with the experimentally measured region of interest curves. The multispoke inversion recovery method showed good muscle and fatty bone marrow suppression, and highlighted short T2 signals such as these from the femoral and tibial cortex. CONCLUSION: Inversion recovery 3D UTE imaging with multiple spoke acquisitions can be used to effectively suppress long T2 signals and highlight short T2 signals within clinical scan times. Theoretical modeling can be used to determine sequence parameters to optimize long T2 signal suppression and maximize short T2 signals. Experimental results on a volunteer confirmed the theoretical predictions. Magn Reson Med 76:577-582, 2016.
PURPOSE: The long repetition time and inversion time with inversion recovery preparation ultrashort echo time (UTE) often causes prohibitively long scan times. We present an optimized method for long T2 signal suppression in which several k-space spokes are acquired after each inversion preparation. THEORY AND METHODS: Using Bloch equations the sequence parameters such as TI and flip angle were optimized to suppress the long T2 water and fat signals and to maximize short T2 contrast. Volunteer imaging was performed on a healthy male volunteer. Inversion recovery preparation was performed using a Silver-Hoult adiabatic inversion pulse together with a three-dimensional (3D) UTE (3D Cones) acquisition. RESULTS: The theoretical signal curves generally agreed with the experimentally measured region of interest curves. The multispoke inversion recovery method showed good muscle and fatty bone marrow suppression, and highlighted short T2 signals such as these from the femoral and tibial cortex. CONCLUSION: Inversion recovery 3D UTE imaging with multiple spoke acquisitions can be used to effectively suppress long T2 signals and highlight short T2 signals within clinical scan times. Theoretical modeling can be used to determine sequence parameters to optimize long T2 signal suppression and maximize short T2 signals. Experimental results on a volunteer confirmed the theoretical predictions. Magn Reson Med 76:577-582, 2016.
Authors: Cheng Li; Jeremy F Magland; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad; Hee Kwon Song; Felix W Wehrli Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-12-08 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Markus Weiger; Mingming Wu; Moritz C Wurnig; David Kenkel; Andreas Boss; Gustav Andreisek; Klaas P Pruessmann Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Alan C Seifert; Cheng Li; Chamith S Rajapakse; Mahdieh Bashoor-Zadeh; Yusuf A Bhagat; Alexander C Wright; Babette S Zemel; Antonios Zavaliangos; Felix W Wehrli Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2014-05-21 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Shihong Li; Lanqing Ma; Eric Y Chang; Hongda Shao; Jun Chen; Christine B Chung; Graeme M Bydder; Jiang Du Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Ya-Jun Ma; Xing Lu; Michael Carl; Yanchun Zhu; Nikolaus M Szeverenyi; Graeme M Bydder; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-01-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Xing Lu; Yajun Ma; Eric Y Chang; Qun He; Adam Searleman; Annette von Drygalski; Jiang Du Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Wen Hong; Qun He; Shujuan Fan; Michael Carl; Hongda Shao; Jun Chen; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-08-06 Impact factor: 4.668