Literature DB >> 24842066

Spatial reference frame of attention in a large outdoor environment.

Yuhong V Jiang1, Bo-Yeong Won1, Khena M Swallow2, Dominic M Mussack1.   

Abstract

A central question about spatial attention is whether it is referenced relative to the external environment or to the viewer. This question has received great interest in recent psychological and neuroscience research, with many but not all, finding evidence for a viewer-centered representation. However, these previous findings were confined to computer-based tasks that involved stationary viewers. Because natural search behaviors differ from computer-based tasks in viewer mobility and spatial scale, it is important to understand how spatial attention is coded in the natural environment. To this end, we created an outdoor visual search task in which participants searched a large (690 square ft), concrete, outdoor space to report which side of a coin on the ground faced up. They began search in the middle of the space and were free to move around. Attentional cuing by statistical learning was examined by placing the coin in 1 quadrant of the search space on 50% of the trials. As in computer-based tasks, participants learned and used these regularities to guide search. However, cuing could be referenced to either the environment or the viewer. The spatial reference frame of attention shows greater flexibility in the natural environment than previously found in the lab.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24842066      PMCID: PMC4122597          DOI: 10.1037/a0036779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  41 in total

1.  Rapid formation of spatiotopic representations as revealed by inhibition of return.

Authors:  Yoni Pertzov; Ehud Zohary; Galia Avidan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The effects of landmarks on the performance of delayed and real-time pointing movements.

Authors:  Sukhvinder S Obhi; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Constructing stable spatial maps of the world.

Authors:  David C Burr; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Probabilistic cuing in large-scale environmental search.

Authors:  Alastair D Smith; Bruce M Hood; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers.

Authors:  Patrick Cavanagh; Amelia R Hunt; Arash Afraz; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 7.  Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Mary M Hayhoe; Michael F Land; Dana H Ballard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Spatial reference frame of incidentally learned attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-12-31

Review 9.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Prolonged disengagement from distractors near the hands.

Authors:  Daniel B Vatterott; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-15
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Habitual versus goal-driven attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Spatial scale, rather than nature of task or locomotion, modulates the spatial reference frame of attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Bo-Yeong Won
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Changing viewer perspectives reveals constraints to implicit visual statistical learning.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The importance of search strategy for finding targets in open terrain.

Authors:  Charlotte A Riggs; Katherine Cornes; Hayward J Godwin; Simon P Liversedge; Richard Guest; Nick Donnelly
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-02-20

5.  Memory shapes visual search strategies in large-scale environments.

Authors:  Chia-Ling Li; M Pilar Aivar; Matthew H Tong; Mary M Hayhoe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Location probability learning in 3-dimensional virtual search environments.

Authors:  Caitlin A Sisk; Victoria Interrante; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-03-24

7.  Memory and visual search in naturalistic 2D and 3D environments.

Authors:  Chia-Ling Li; M Pilar Aivar; Dmitry M Kit; Matthew H Tong; Mary M Hayhoe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.