Literature DB >> 23513621

Constructing stable spatial maps of the world.

David C Burr1, Maria Concetta Morrone.   

Abstract

To interact rapidly and effectively with our environment, our brain needs access to a neural representation--or map--of the spatial layout of the external world. However, the construction of such a map poses major challenges to the visual system, given that the images on our retinae depend on where the eyes are looking, and shift each time we move our eyes, head, and body to explore the world. Much research has been devoted to how the stability is achieved, with the debate often polarized between the utility of spatiotopic maps (that remain solid in external coordinates), as opposed to transiently updated retinotopic maps. Our research suggests that the visual system uses both strategies to maintain stability. fMRI, motion-adaptation, and saccade-adaptation studies demonstrate and characterize spatiotopic neural maps within the dorsal visual stream that remain solid in external rather than retinal coordinates. However, the construction of these maps takes time (up to 500 ms) and attentional resources. To solve the immediate problems created by individual saccades, we postulate the existence of a separate system to bridge each saccade with neural units that are 'transiently craniotopic'. These units prepare for the effects of saccades with a shift of their receptive fields before the saccade starts, then relaxing back into their standard position during the saccade, compensating for its action. Psychophysical studies investigating localization of stimuli flashed briefly around the time of saccades provide strong support for these neural mechanisms, and show quantitatively how they integrate information across saccades. This transient system cooperates with the spatiotopic mechanism to provide a useful map to guide interactions with our environment: one rapid and transitory, bringing into play the high-resolution visual areas; the other slow, long-lasting, and low-resolution, useful for interacting with the world.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23513621     DOI: 10.1068/p7392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  20 in total

1.  Spatial position information accumulates steadily over time.

Authors:  Eckart Zimmermann; M Concetta Morrone; David C Burr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Compression and suppression of shifting receptive field activity in frontal eye field neurons.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; James Cavanaugh; Robert H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Saccadic remapping of object-selective information.

Authors:  Benjamin A Wolfe; David Whitney
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Spatial reference frame of attention in a large outdoor environment.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Bo-Yeong Won; Khena M Swallow; Dominic M Mussack
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Attentional load interferes with target localization across saccades.

Authors:  W Joseph MacInnes; Amelia R Hunt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Spatiotopic coding during dynamic head tilt.

Authors:  Kyriaki Mikellidou; Marco Turi; David C Burr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Changing viewer perspectives reveals constraints to implicit visual statistical learning.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Eye choice for acquisition of targets in alternating strabismus.

Authors:  John R Economides; Daniel L Adams; Jonathan C Horton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Action planning and predictive coding when speaking.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Daniel H Mathalon; Brian J Roach; James Reilly; Sarah K Keedy; John A Sweeney; Judith M Ford
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  The oblique effect is both allocentric and egocentric.

Authors:  Kyriaki Mikellidou; Guido Marco Cicchini; Peter G Thompson; David C Burr
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.