Literature DB >> 20189870

Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers.

Patrick Cavanagh1, Amelia R Hunt, Arash Afraz, Martin Rolfs.   

Abstract

When we move our eyes, we easily keep track of where relevant things are in the world. Recent proposals link this stability to the shifting of receptive fields of neurons in eye movement and attention control areas. Reports of 'spatiotopic' visual aftereffects have also been claimed to support this shifting connectivity even at an early level, but these results have been challenged. Here, the process of updating visual location is described as predictive shifts of location 'pointers' to attended targets, analogous to predictive activation seen cross-modally. We argue that these location pointers, the core operators of spatial attention, are linked to identity information and that such a link is necessary to establish a workable visual architecture and to explain frequently reported positive spatiotopic biases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20189870      PMCID: PMC2847621          DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  66 in total

1.  Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention.

Authors:  F A Verstraten; P Cavanagh; A T Labianca
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Attentional modulation of visual processing.

Authors:  John H Reynolds; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements.

Authors:  J R Duhamel; C L Colby; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Beyond retinotopic mapping: the spatial representation of objects in the human lateral occipital complex.

Authors:  Ayelet McKyton; Ehud Zohary
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Neural mechanisms for timing visual events are spatially selective in real-world coordinates.

Authors:  David Burr; Arianna Tozzi; M Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-18       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Topography of the motion aftereffect with and without eye movements.

Authors:  Ali Ezzati; Ashkan Golzar; Arash S R Afraz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex.

Authors:  J P Gottlieb; M Kusunoki; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-01-29       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Spatiotopic selectivity of BOLD responses to visual motion in human area MT.

Authors:  Giovanni d'Avossa; Michela Tosetti; Sofia Crespi; Laura Biagi; David C Burr; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-12-31       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 9.  Change blindness: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Daniel J Simons; Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Subcortical modulation of attention counters change blindness.

Authors:  James Cavanaugh; Robert H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 6.709

View more
  134 in total

1.  Higher level visual cortex represents retinotopic, not spatiotopic, object location.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Retinotopic memory is more precise than spatiotopic memory.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Remapping of the line motion illusion across eye movements.

Authors:  David Melcher; Alessio Fracasso
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Spatial maps for time and motion.

Authors:  Maria Concetta Morrone; Marco Cicchini; David C Burr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Predictive remapping of attention across eye movements.

Authors:  Martin Rolfs; Donatas Jonikaitis; Heiner Deubel; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-26       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Perceptual learning beyond retinotopic reference frame.

Authors:  En Zhang; Wu Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Dynamics of visual receptive fields in the macaque frontal eye field.

Authors:  J Patrick Mayo; Amie R DiTomasso; Marc A Sommer; Matthew A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Saccades create similar mislocalizations in visual and auditory space.

Authors:  Hannah M Krüger; Thérèse Collins; Bernhard Englitz; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Nonretinotopic exogenous attention.

Authors:  Marco Boi; Mark Vergeer; Haluk Ogmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 10.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.