Literature DB >> 20592210

Rapid formation of spatiotopic representations as revealed by inhibition of return.

Yoni Pertzov1, Ehud Zohary, Galia Avidan.   

Abstract

Inhibition of return (IOR), a performance decrement for stimuli appearing at recently cued locations, occurs when the target and cue share the same screen position. This is in contrast to cue-based attention facilitation effects that were recently suggested to be mapped in a retinotopic reference frame, the prevailing representation throughout early visual processing stages. Here, we investigate the dynamics of IOR in both reference frames, using a modified cued-location saccadic reaction time task with an intervening saccade between cue and target presentation. Thus, on different trials, the target was present either at the same retinotopic location as the cue, or at the same screen position (e.g., spatiotopic location). IOR was primarily found for targets appearing at the same spatiotopic position as the initial cue, when the cue and target were presented at the same hemifield. This suggests that there is restricted information transfer of cue position across the two hemispheres. Moreover, the effect was maximal when the target was presented 10 ms after the intervening saccade ended and was attenuated in longer delays. In our case, therefore, the representation of previously attended locations (as revealed by IOR) is not remapped slowly after the execution of a saccade. Rather, either a retinotopic representation is remapped rapidly, adjacent to the end of the saccade (using a prospective motor command), or the positions of the cue and target are encoded in a spatiotopic reference frame, regardless of eye position. Spatial attention can therefore be allocated to target positions defined in extraretinal coordinates.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20592210      PMCID: PMC6632889          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3986-09.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  27 in total

1.  Higher level visual cortex represents retinotopic, not spatiotopic, object location.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Anticipatory saccade target processing and the presaccadic transfer of visual features.

Authors:  Marc Zirnsak; Ricarda G K Gerhards; Roozbeh Kiani; Markus Lappe; Fred H Hamker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Retinotopic memory is more precise than spatiotopic memory.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sensory and motor mechanisms of oculomotor inhibition of return.

Authors:  Zhiguo Wang; Jason Satel; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Nonretinotopic exogenous attention.

Authors:  Marco Boi; Mark Vergeer; Haluk Ogmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Visual stability.

Authors:  David Melcher
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Eye movements help link different views in scene-selective cortex.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Alice R Albrecht; Soojin Park; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Short-latency allocentric control of saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Mrinmoy Chakrabarty; Tamami Nakano; Shigeru Kitazawa
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Investigating a two causes theory of inhibition of return.

Authors:  Jason Satel; Zhiguo Wang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Anticipatory remapping of attentional priority across the entire visual field.

Authors:  Koorosh Mirpour; James W Bisley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.