Anthony M Rush1, David A Nelles, Angela P Blum, Sarah A Barnhill, Erick T Tatro, Gene W Yeo, Nathan C Gianneschi. 1. Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, ‡Stem Cell Program and Institute for Genomic Medicine, §Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, ∥Department of Psychiatry, ⊥Materials Science and Engineering, University of California , San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States.
Abstract
We present an untemplated, single-component antisense oligonucleotide delivery system capable of regulating mRNA abundance in live human cells. While most approaches to nucleic acid delivery rely on secondary carriers and complex multicomponent charge-neutralizing formulations, we demonstrate efficient delivery using a simple locked nucleic acid (LNA)-polymer conjugate that assembles into spherical micellar nanoparticles displaying a dense shell of nucleic acid at the surface. Cellular uptake of soft LNA nanoparticles occurs rapidly within minutes as evidenced by flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy. Importantly, these LNA nanoparticles knockdown survivin mRNA, an established target for cancer therapy, in a sequence-specific fashion as analyzed by RT-PCR.
We present an untemplated, single-component antisense oligonucleotide delivery system capable of regulating mRNA abundance in live human cells. While most approaches to nucleic acid delivery rely on secondary carriers and complex multicomponent charge-neutralizing formulations, we demonstrate efficient delivery using a simple locked nucleic acid (LNA)-polymer conjugate that assembles into spherical micellar nanoparticles displaying a dense shell of nucleic acid at the surface. Cellular uptake of soft LNA nanoparticles occurs rapidly within minutes as evidenced by flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy. Importantly, these LNA nanoparticles knockdown survivin mRNA, an established target for cancer therapy, in a sequence-specific fashion as analyzed by RT-PCR.
Modulation of intracellular
RNA abundance provides an exceptional opportunity to study and influence
gene function and cellular behavior. In order to systematically exploit
this opportunity, the delivery of nucleic acids to relevant biological
compartments has been extensively investigated for the past 50 years.[1,2] Despite exhaustive efforts, nucleic acid–based therapies
have realized limited success. This shortcoming is largely due to
insufficient biostability of nucleic acids, off-target effects of
modified nucleic acids, and ultimately the inability to deliver naked
nucleic acids across phospholipid membranes.[3,4] The
success of nucleic acid-based therapies relies on the ability to rationally
design well-defined and stable materials capable of overcoming these
barriers. Multicomponent, vector-facilitated nucleic acid delivery
has emerged as a powerful tool in the past decade due to convenience,
effectiveness, and the ability to adapt materials for in vivo experimentation.[5−7] However, progress in multicomponent nucleic acid
delivery using viral vectors, lipoplex formulations, or cationic transfection
agents has been hindered by numerous setbacks including toxicity,
immunogenicity, DNA release, and nucleic acid instability.[8,9] More recently, single-component nucleic acid based materials have
been developed as well-defined alternatives to multicomponent DNA
delivery systems.[10−13] Spherical nucleic acids (SNAs)[14] represent
a unique class of stable[15] DNA delivery
vehicles that display nucleic acids at the surface of the nanomaterial,
hence eliminating the need to release nucleic acids from a condensed
or sequestered state. Materials capable of regulating mRNA abundance in cellulo without the need for the incorporation of a cellular
internalizing component have only been demonstrated using metal-templated
SNAs.[16,17] Despite the success of gold-core SNAs, the
requirement for metal templation imposes certain constraints and limitations
on the resulting SNAs including oligo attachment chemistry, chemical
diversity of the core itself, and maximum nucleic acid density achievable
in the nanoparticle shell.[18] Furthermore,
in order to avoid toxicity associated with gold nanoparticle accumulation,[19,20] the template must be chemically dissolved once the material has
been synthesized.[21] In the interest of
developing multifunctional and nontoxic oligonucleotide delivery agents
with novel properties, it is necessary to develop new strategies toward
accessing and expanding upon this unique class of materials. In this
work we demonstrate that efficient cellular uptake and potent mRNA
regulation can be achieved with a new class of spherical nucleic acid,
namely LNA-polymer amphiphile (LPA) nanoparticles.LPA nanoparticles
are discrete assemblies of a well-defined polymer-LNA
conjugate prepared via solid-phase coupling of a carboxylic acid terminated
norbornyl polymer with an amine-modified LNA oligonucleotide on controlled
pore glass (CPG) beads. After conjugation, LPAs are cleaved from the
solid support with an aqueous base to yield well-defined spherical
polymeric micellar nanoparticles (Figure 1).
LPA nanoparticle formation in aqueous solution is driven by the hydrophobic
effect,[22] hence the micelles are composed
of a hydrophobic polynorbornyl core with each polymer covalently bound
through an amide linkage to one solvated hydrophilic oligonucleotide
in the shell. This chemistry is important in that it drives the dense
packing of negatively charged, self-repulsive nucleic acids in the
micelle corona via energetically favorable solvent exclusion governed
by the hydrophobic polymer core. It is noteworthy to mention that
nucleic acid density achieved in the nanoparticle shell is exceptionally
high as evidenced in previous work from our laboratory demonstrating
that analogous DNA-based nanoparticles can render DNA resistant to
degradation by both endo- and exonucleases.[23] LPA nanoparticles average 20 nm in diameter as evidenced by transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS; see Figure 1 and Supporting Information Figures S1–S3). These materials are the first example of
a nontemplated and purely organic single-component nanoparticle to
demonstrate efficient cellular uptake and subsequent mRNA regulation
via antisense activity in live cells.
Figure 1
LPA composition and charcterization by
electron microscopy. LPAs
assemble into spherical micellar nanoparticles as they are released
from solid support and dispersed into aqueous solution. The resulting
nanoparticles are roughly 20 nm in diameter as evidenced by negative
stain TEM and DLS. LPA nanoparticles consist of a hydrophobic polynorbornyl
core and a fluorescently labeled hydrophilic LNA shell designed to
be complementary (antisense) or noncomplementary (nonsense) to a 20-base
region of mRNA responsible for synthesizing the protein survivin.
LNA bases are indicated in orange, “Pol” indicates the
norbornene polymer conjugated to the 5′ end of the LNA sequence,
F and FdT represent fluorescein-modified thymidine, and Cy5 represents
an incorporated cyanine 5 phosphoramidite.
LPA composition and charcterization by
electron microscopy. LPAs
assemble into spherical micellar nanoparticles as they are released
from solid support and dispersed into aqueous solution. The resulting
nanoparticles are roughly 20 nm in diameter as evidenced by negative
stain TEM and DLS. LPA nanoparticles consist of a hydrophobic polynorbornyl
core and a fluorescently labeled hydrophilic LNA shell designed to
be complementary (antisense) or noncomplementary (nonsense) to a 20-base
region of mRNA responsible for synthesizing the protein survivin.
LNA bases are indicated in orange, “Pol” indicates the
norbornenepolymer conjugated to the 5′ end of the LNA sequence,
F and FdT represent fluorescein-modified thymidine, and Cy5 represents
an incorporated cyanine 5 phosphoramidite.To examine the efficiency of LPA nanoparticle cellular uptake
and
subsequent interaction with intracellular mRNA, three different LPA
nanoparticles were designed and synthesized (Figure 1 and Supporting Information Figure
S4). The first micelle, termed antisense fluorescein-labeled LPA (AS-FL-LPA) nanoparticle, contains a fluorescently labeled
LNA sequence complementary to a 20-base region located in the second
exon of survivin mRNA in HeLa cells. As a control, a second micelle
was synthesized, termed nonsense fluorescein-labeled LPA (NS-FL-LPA) nanoparticle, in which the nucleotide sequence was scrambled. We
anticipated that comparison of the activity of these two distinct
materials would facilitate determination of the sequence-specific
nature of LPA nanoparticle mediated survivin mRNA regulation. A third
micelle, termed antisense cyanine 5-labeled LPA (AS-CY5-LPA) nanoparticle, was designed to interrogate the influence of the
incorporated dye on LPA nanoparticle uptake in HeLa cells.[24−26]As an initial experiment, AS-FL-LPA nanoparticles
and the corresponding naked single-stranded fluorescein-labeled LNA
sequence were incubated with HeLa cells to investigate the extent
of uptake of each species measured by fluorescence-activated cell
sorting (FACS, Figure 2). After incubation
with 5 nM AS-FL-LPA nanoparticle or 1 μM (the equivalent
concentration with respect to LNA and fluorescein dye) naked fluorescein-labeled
ssLNA analogue for 2 h, FACS analysis reveals an approximately 10-fold
increase in population-wide fluorescence at 533 nm for those cells
treated with LPA nanoparticles as compared to those treated with the
ssLNA analogue (Figure 2A and Supporting Information Figure S5). Uptake for Cy5-labeled
LPA nanoparticles shows a similar trend (Figure 2B and Supporting Information Figure S6).
However, in contrast to fluorescein-labeled ssLNA, there is observable
association of the naked Cy5-labeled ssLNA analogue with HeLa cells.
As the LNA nucleobase sequence is identical to that of the fluorescein-labeled
ssLNA, this effect may be a result of cyanine 5 incorporation, as
certain dye molecules are known to associate with cell membranes.[24−26] Nevertheless, HeLa cells incubated with 5 nM AS-CY5-LPA nanoparticles demonstrate a ca. 10-fold increase in fluorescence
per cell at 675 nm as compared to those cells treated with the Cy5-labeled
ssLNA analogue. These results underscore the importance of the three-dimensional
arrangement of oligonucleotides in facilitating cellular association.[14] Indeed, it has been recently demonstrated that
other varieties of nanostructured DNA-based materials undergo cellular
uptake more efficiently than single-stranded analogues.[27,28]
Figure 2
Uptake
of dye-labeled LPA nanoparticles in HeLa cells. (A) FACS
distributions showing the intensity of fluorescence among HeLa cells
treated with the antisense fluorescein-labeled LNA-polymer amphiphile
(AS-FL-LPA) after a 2 h incubation in the presence of nanoparticles.
Data are gated on 2500 total events, λex = 488 nm,
λem = 533 ± 15 nm; see Supporting
Information Figure S5 for details. (B) FACS data showing fluorescent
cell population due to antisense Cy5-labeled (AS-CY5-LPA) micelle
uptake in HeLa cells after incubation for 2 h. Data are gated on 2500
total events, λex = 640 nm, λem =
675 ± 12.5 nm; see Supporting Information Figure S6 for details. (C–E) Confocal fluorescence microscopy
of AS-FL-LPA-treated HeLa cells (C, λex= 488 nm),
untreated HeLa cells (D, λex= 488 nm, 635 nm), and
antisense Cy5 LPA nanoparticle-treated HeLa cells (E, λex = 635 nm) showing material uptake and distribution in a
single z-slice. Time points are indicated on each panel; scale bars
are 50 μm. See Supporting Information Figures S7 and S8 for z-stack images.
Uptake
of dye-labeled LPA nanoparticles in HeLa cells. (A) FACS
distributions showing the intensity of fluorescence among HeLa cells
treated with the antisense fluorescein-labeled LNA-polymer amphiphile
(AS-FL-LPA) after a 2 h incubation in the presence of nanoparticles.
Data are gated on 2500 total events, λex = 488 nm,
λem = 533 ± 15 nm; see Supporting
Information Figure S5 for details. (B) FACS data showing fluorescent
cell population due to antisense Cy5-labeled (AS-CY5-LPA) micelle
uptake in HeLa cells after incubation for 2 h. Data are gated on 2500
total events, λex = 640 nm, λem =
675 ± 12.5 nm; see Supporting Information Figure S6 for details. (C–E) Confocal fluorescence microscopy
of AS-FL-LPA-treated HeLa cells (C, λex= 488 nm),
untreated HeLa cells (D, λex= 488 nm, 635 nm), and
antisense Cy5LPA nanoparticle-treated HeLa cells (E, λex = 635 nm) showing material uptake and distribution in a
single z-slice. Time points are indicated on each panel; scale bars
are 50 μm. See Supporting Information Figures S7 and S8 for z-stack images.Having established that LPA nanoparticles associate with
HeLa cells
by FACS, we performed live-cell z-stack confocal fluorescence microscopy
to determine the extent of nanoparticle internalization as well as
intracellular distribution (Figure 2 C–E
and Supporting Information Figures S7 and
S8). Live HeLa cells were imaged after LPA nanoparticle incubation
in order to discern the distribution of LPA nanoparticles relative
to cellular boundaries without the introduction of artifacts associated
with cell fixation. Based on confocal fluorescence images it is apparent
that LPA nanoparticles are distributed diffusely throughout the cell
body in some cells (ca. 70% of cells, as determined by visual inspection
of the imaged area) after 10 min of incubation and in almost all imaged
cells (ca. 98% of cells, as determined by visual inspection of the
imaged area) after 2 h of incubation with LPA nanoparticles. This,
along with FACS data, suggests that micelles are rapidly taken up
into HeLa cells and effectively distributed in the cytosol.RNA plays a central role in regulating and propagating genetic
information; hence numerous efforts have demonstrated the utility
of manipulating the expression of disease-causing genes via interference
with various RNAs.[29] To determine if LPA
nanoparticles are able to modulate intracellular mRNA levels, we designed
nanoparticles capable of base-pairing in an antisense fashion specifically
with a 20-base region of survivin mRNA, an RNA associated with proliferation
of HeLa and other cancerous cells.[100] After
treatment with antisense (AS-FL-LPA) or nonsense (NS-FL-LPA) micelles, total HeLa RNA was harvested and analyzed
for relative abundance of survivin mRNA (Figure 3B). Treatment with antisense LPA nanoparticles significantly depleted
survivin mRNA levels relative to endogenous GAPDH mRNA transcripts,
suggesting efficient, sequence-specific regulation of mRNA levels
(Figure 3B). Treatment with nonsense LPA nanoparticles
showed no significant effect on survivin mRNA levels when compared
to levels in untreated cells. To our knowledge, other than gold-templated
SNAs, there has been only one other example in the literature of a
DNA-based nanomaterial demonstrating gene-specific interactions without
the need for an auxiliary uptake-enhancing component.[30]
Figure 3
LPA nanoparticle uptake and survivin mRNA depletion. (A) FACS data
showing similar uptake for both antisense and nonsense LPA nanoparticles
after incubation with HeLa cells for 2 h. λex= 488
nm, λem = 533 ± 15 nm; see Suporting Information Figure S9 for more details. (B) RT-PCR
results showing sequence-selective survivin mRNA knockdown due to
treatment with antisense LPA nanoparticles (AS-FL-LPA). See Supporting Information Tables S1 and S2 for more
information.
LPA nanoparticle uptake and survivin mRNA depletion. (A) FACS data
showing similar uptake for both antisense and nonsense LPA nanoparticles
after incubation with HeLa cells for 2 h. λex= 488
nm, λem = 533 ± 15 nm; see Suporting Information Figure S9 for more details. (B) RT-PCR
results showing sequence-selective survivin mRNA knockdown due to
treatment with antisense LPA nanoparticles (AS-FL-LPA). See Supporting Information Tables S1 and S2 for more
information.Given that cellular uptake
and internalization of LPA nanoparticles
appears to be rapid and efficient, we investigated the kinetics, cytotoxicity,
and potential mechanism for LPA nanoparticle uptake (Figure 4). Previous reports concerning spherical nucleic
acids indicate rapid cellular internalization that is dependent on
Type A scavenger receptors and cholesterol-dependent caveolae-mediated
endocytosis.[31] LPA nanoparticles exhibit
rapid uptake within 10 min of introduction to adherent cells across
five different cell lines including humanembryonic kidney cells (Figure 4A and Supporting Information Figures S10–12, Table S3). LPA nanoparticle association with
the cell appears to reach a maximum between 30 and 60 min after incubation
for each of the four cancerous cell lines studied. Furthermore, LPA
nanoparticle uptake in HeLa cells appears to be dependent on cholesterol,
as treatment with methyl-β-cyclodextrin significantly decreases
association of LPA nanoparticles (Figure 4B).
In our hands, treatment with other pharmacological inhibitors or disruptors
of the aforementioned endocytotic pathways did not have a significant
effect on cellular association in HeLa cells (Supporting Information Figures S13, S14 and Tables S4 and
S5). Futhermore, LPA nanoparticles show no appreciable cytotoxicity
in HeLa cells when analyzing membrane integrity after 1 h of incubation
using propidium iodide as a probe (Figure 4C and Supporting Information Figure S15
and Table S6).
Figure 4
AS-FL-LPA Nanoparticle uptake kinetics, dependence on
cholesterol,
and cytotoxicity. (A) Compiled FACS data showing LPA nanoparticle
uptake over time in various cell lines. Data are gated on a minumum
of 2500 events, λex = 488 nm, λem = 533 ± 15 nm; see Supporting Information Figures S10 and S11 for more information. (B) Compiled FACS data
showing a decrease in LPA nanoparticle uptake after HeLa cells were
treated with methyl-β-cyclodextrin λex= 488
nm, λem = 533 ± 15 nm; see Supporting Information Figures S13, S14, and Tables S4 and
S5 for more information. (C) Compiled FACS data showing relative cytotoxicity
for 5 nM and 10 nM LPA nanoparticle treatments versus treatment with
0.25% Triton-X 100. Cytotoxicity was assessed via cell-associated
propidium iodide fluorescence, λex = 488 nm, λem filter = 670 nm LP. See Supporting Information Figure S15 and Table S6 for more information.
AS-FL-LPA Nanoparticle uptake kinetics, dependence on
cholesterol,
and cytotoxicity. (A) Compiled FACS data showing LPA nanoparticle
uptake over time in various cell lines. Data are gated on a minumum
of 2500 events, λex = 488 nm, λem = 533 ± 15 nm; see Supporting Information Figures S10 and S11 for more information. (B) Compiled FACS data
showing a decrease in LPA nanoparticle uptake after HeLa cells were
treated with methyl-β-cyclodextrin λex= 488
nm, λem = 533 ± 15 nm; see Supporting Information Figures S13, S14, and Tables S4 and
S5 for more information. (C) Compiled FACS data showing relative cytotoxicity
for 5 nM and 10 nM LPA nanoparticle treatments versus treatment with
0.25% Triton-X 100. Cytotoxicity was assessed via cell-associated
propidium iodide fluorescence, λex = 488 nm, λem filter = 670 nm LP. See Supporting Information Figure S15 and Table S6 for more information.The development of hybrid nucleic acid-based materials capable
of facilitating potent and specific interactions in complex biological
milieu hinges upon the ability to create well-defined elements with
predictable attributes and diverse composition. The straightforward
synthesis, high-density display of covalently bound nucleic acids,
and the potential for chemical diversification make LPA nanoparticles
ideal candidates in forming the basis of next generation smart biomaterials
capable of recognizing and responding to particular gene expression
features.
Authors: Graham D Hamblin; Karina M M Carneiro; Johans F Fakhoury; Katherine E Bujold; Hanadi F Sleiman Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Apiwat Chompoosor; Krishnendu Saha; Partha S Ghosh; Dylan J Macarthy; Oscar R Miranda; Zheng-Jiang Zhu; Kathleen F Arcaro; Vincent M Rotello Journal: Small Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 13.281
Authors: Colin M Calabrese; Chad A Mirkin; Timothy J Merkel; William E Briley; Pratik S Randeria; Suguna P Narayan; Jessica L Rouge; David A Walker; Alexander W Scott Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Chuan Zhang; Liangliang Hao; Colin M Calabrese; Yu Zhou; Chung Hang J Choi; Hang Xing; Chad A Mirkin Journal: Small Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 13.281
Authors: Alexander Roloff; David A Nelles; Matthew P Thompson; Gene W Yeo; Nathan C Gianneschi Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Yiwen Li; Yuran Huang; Zhao Wang; Fabio Carniato; Yijun Xie; Joseph P Patterson; Matthew P Thompson; Christopher M Andolina; Treffly B Ditri; Jill E Millstone; Joshua S Figueroa; Jeffrey D Rinehart; Miriam Scadeng; Mauro Botta; Nathan C Gianneschi Journal: Small Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 13.281
Authors: Resham J Banga; Sai Archana Krovi; Suguna P Narayan; Anthony J Sprangers; Guoliang Liu; Chad A Mirkin; SonBinh T Nguyen Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 6.988