Literature DB >> 24815268

Speech recognition against harmonic and inharmonic complexes: spectral dips and periodicity.

Mickael L D Deroche1, John F Culling2, Monita Chatterjee3, Charles J Limb1.   

Abstract

Speech recognition in a complex masker usually benefits from masker harmonicity, but there are several factors at work. The present study focused on two of them, glimpsing spectrally in between masker partials and periodicity within individual frequency channels. Using both a theoretical and an experimental approach, it is demonstrated that when inharmonic complexes are generated by jittering partials from their harmonic positions, there are better opportunities for spectral glimpsing in inharmonic than in harmonic maskers, and this difference is enhanced as fundamental frequency (F0) increases. As a result, measurements of masking level difference between the two maskers can be reduced, particularly at higher F0s. Using inharmonic maskers that offer similar glimpsing opportunity to harmonic maskers, it was found that the masking level difference between the two maskers varied little with F0, was influenced by periodicity of the first four partials, and could occur in low-, mid-, or high-frequency regions. Overall, the present results suggested that both spectral glimpsing and periodicity contribute to speech recognition under masking by harmonic complexes, and these effects seem independent from one another.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24815268      PMCID: PMC4032410          DOI: 10.1121/1.4870056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Waveform interactions and the segregation of concurrent vowels.

Authors:  A de Cheveigné
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A masking level difference due to harmonicity.

Authors:  W C Treurniet; D R Boucher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perceptual fusion and fragmentation of complex tones made inharmonic by applying different degrees of frequency shift and spectral stretch.

Authors:  B Roberts; J M Brunstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: harmonic resolvability or harmonic number?

Authors:  Joshua G Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Effects of spectral pattern on the perceptual salience of partials in harmonic and frequency-shifted complex tones: a performance measure.

Authors:  B Roberts
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Modulation masking: effects of modulation frequency, depth, and phase.

Authors:  S P Bacon; D W Grantham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Masking produced by spectral uncertainty with multicomponent maskers.

Authors:  D L Neff; D M Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-05

9.  Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level.

Authors:  R Plomp; A M Mimpen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Phase effects in masking by harmonic complexes: speech recognition.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; John F Culling; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  8 in total

1.  The role of pitch and harmonic cancellation when listening to speech in harmonic background sounds.

Authors:  Daniel R Guest; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A harmonic-cancellation-based model to predict speech intelligibility against a harmonic masker.

Authors:  Luna Prud'homme; Mathieu Lavandier; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effect of fundamental frequency contour similarity on multi-talker listening in older and younger adults.

Authors:  Peter A Wasiuk; Mathieu Lavandier; Emily Buss; Jacob Oleson; Lauren Calandruccio
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Roles of the target and masker fundamental frequencies in voice segregation.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; John F Culling; Monita Chatterjee; Charles J Limb
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Similar abilities of musicians and non-musicians to segregate voices by fundamental frequency.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; Charles J Limb; Monita Chatterjee; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Inharmonic speech reveals the role of harmonicity in the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Sara Popham; Dana Boebinger; Dan P W Ellis; Hideki Kawahara; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Harmonic Cancellation-A Fundamental of Auditory Scene Analysis.

Authors:  Alain de Cheveigné
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Bottom-up and top-down neural signatures of disordered multi-talker speech perception in adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Kenneth E Hancock; Kara Bennett; Victor DeGruttola; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 8.140

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.