Literature DB >> 11757937

Perceptual fusion and fragmentation of complex tones made inharmonic by applying different degrees of frequency shift and spectral stretch.

B Roberts1, J M Brunstrom.   

Abstract

Global pitch depends on harmonic relations between components, but the perceptual coherence of a complex tone cannot be explained in the same way. Instead, it has been proposed that the auditory system responds to a common pattern of equal spacing between components, but is only sensitive to deviations from this pattern over a limited range [Roberts and Brunstrom, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 2326-2338 (1998)]. This hypothesis predicts that spectral fusion will be largely unaffected either by frequency shifting a harmonic stimulus (because equal spacing is preserved), or by small degrees of spectral stretch (because significant deviations from equal spacing only cumulate over large spectral distances). Complex tones were either shifted by 0%-50% of F0 (200 Hz+/-10%) or stretched by 0%-12% of F0 (100 Hz+/-10%). Subjects heard a complex followed by a pure tone in a continuous loop. One of the components 2-11 was mistuned by +/- 4%, and subjects adjusted the pure tone to match its pitch. Broadly consistent with our hypothesis, frequency shifts had relatively little effect on hit rates and only large degrees of stretch reduced them substantially. The implications for simultaneous grouping are explored with reference to an autocorrelation model of auditory processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11757937     DOI: 10.1121/1.1410965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Does fundamental-frequency discrimination measure virtual pitch discrimination?

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Kristin Divis; David M Wrobleski; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to double harmonic tones.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to harmonic and mistuned complex tones.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Further evidence that fundamental-frequency difference limens measure pitch discrimination.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Claire M Ryan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Recent advances in exploring the neural underpinnings of auditory scene perception.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Speech recognition against harmonic and inharmonic complexes: spectral dips and periodicity.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; John F Culling; Monita Chatterjee; Charles J Limb
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Neural correlates of auditory scene analysis based on inharmonicity in monkey primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Yonatan I Fishman; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Pitch, harmonicity and concurrent sound segregation: psychoacoustical and neurophysiological findings.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Perception and cortical neural coding of harmonic fusion in ferrets.

Authors:  Sridhar Kalluri; Didier A Depireux; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it?

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.231

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.