Literature DB >> 25190396

Roles of the target and masker fundamental frequencies in voice segregation.

Mickael L D Deroche1, John F Culling2, Monita Chatterjee3, Charles J Limb1.   

Abstract

Intelligibility of a target voice improves when its fundamental frequency (F0) differs from that of a masking voice, but it remains unclear how this masking release (MR) depends on the two relative F0s. Three experiments measured speech reception thresholds (SRTs) for a target voice against different maskers. Experiment 1 evaluated the influence of target F0 itself. SRTs against white noise were elevated by at least 2 dB for a monotonized target voice compared with the unprocessed voice, but SRTs differed little for F0s between 50 and 150 Hz. In experiments 2 and 3, a MR occurred when there was a steady difference in F0 between the target voice and a stationary speech-shaped harmonic complex or a babble. However, this MR was considerably larger when the F0 of the masker was 11 semitones above the target F0 than when it was 11 semitones below. In contrast, for a fixed masker F0, the MR was similar whether the target F0 was above or below. The dependency of these MRs on the masker F0 suggests that a spectral mechanism such as glimpsing in between resolved masker partials may account for an important part of this phenomenon.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25190396      PMCID: PMC4165228          DOI: 10.1121/1.4890649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  Intrinsic envelope fluctuations and modulation-detection thresholds for narrow-band noise carriers.

Authors:  T Dau; J Verhey; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length changes on attention to one of two simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  Christopher J Darwin; Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with different fundamental frequencies.

Authors:  P F Assmann; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Consonant identification in N-talker babble is a nonmonotonic function of N.

Authors:  Sarah A Simpson; Martin Cooke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The role of fundamental frequency contours in the perception of speech against interfering speech.

Authors:  Christine Binns; John F Culling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech recognition against harmonic and inharmonic complexes: spectral dips and periodicity.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; John F Culling; Monita Chatterjee; Charles J Limb
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0.

Authors:  J F Culling; C J Darwin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Phase effects in masking by harmonic complexes: speech recognition.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; John F Culling; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Modeling the identification of concurrent vowels with different fundamental frequencies.

Authors:  R Meddis; M J Hewitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  The role of pitch and harmonic cancellation when listening to speech in harmonic background sounds.

Authors:  Daniel R Guest; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Similar abilities of musicians and non-musicians to segregate voices by fundamental frequency.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; Charles J Limb; Monita Chatterjee; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speech in noise perception improved by training fine auditory discrimination: far and applicable transfer of perceptual learning.

Authors:  Xiang Gao; Tingting Yan; Ting Huang; Xiaoli Li; Yu-Xuan Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Harmonic Cancellation-A Fundamental of Auditory Scene Analysis.

Authors:  Alain de Cheveigné
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Musicians do not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in competing speech backgrounds.

Authors:  Sara M K Madsen; Kelly L Whiteford; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Disturbed Balance of Inhibitory Signaling Links Hearing Loss and Cognition.

Authors:  Marlies Knipper; Wibke Singer; Kerstin Schwabe; Gisela E Hagberg; Yiwen Li Hegner; Lukas Rüttiger; Christoph Braun; Rüdiger Land
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.492

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.