Literature DB >> 500971

Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level.

R Plomp, A M Mimpen.   

Abstract

For 140 male subjects (20 per decade between the ages 20 and 89) and 72 female subjects (20 per decade between 60 and 89, and 12 for the age interval 90-96), the monaural speech-reception threshold (SRT) for sentences was investigated in quiet and at four noise levels (22.2, 37.5, 52.5, and 67.5 dBA noise with long-term average speech spectra). The median SRT as well as the quartiles are given as a function of age. The data are described in terms of a model published earlier [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 533-549 (1978)]. According to this model every hearing loss for speech (SHL) is interpreted as the sum of a loss class A (attenuation), characterized by a reduction of the levels of both speech signal and noise, and a loss class D (distortion), comparable with a decrease in signal-to-noise ratio. Both SHLA+D (hearing loss in quiet) and SHLD (hearing loss at high noise levels) increase progressively above the age of 50 (reaching typical values of 30 and 6 dB, respectively, at age 85). The spread of SHLD as a function of SHLA+D for the individual ears is so large (sigma = 2.7 dB) that subjects with the same hearing loss for speech in quiet may differ considerably in their ability to understand speech in noise. The data confirm that the hearing handicap of many elderly subjects manifests itself primarily in a noisy environment. Acceptable noise levels in rooms used by the aged must be 5 to 10 dB lower than those for normal-hearing subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 500971     DOI: 10.1121/1.383554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  62 in total

1.  Hybridizing conversational and clear speech to investigate the source of increased intelligibility in speakers with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Kris Tjaden; Alexander Kain; Jennifer Lam
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Impact of clear, loud, and slow speech on scaled intelligibility and speech severity in Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Kris Tjaden; Joan E Sussman; Gregory E Wilding
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Psychophysical estimates of nonlinear cochlear processing in younger and older listeners.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Aging and speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Behavioral measures of signal recognition thresholds in frogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Joshua J Schwartz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Characteristics and determinants of music appreciation in adult CI users.

Authors:  Birgit Philips; Bart Vinck; Eddy De Vel; Leen Maes; Wendy D'Haenens; Hannah Keppler; Ingeborg Dhooge
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Effects of hearing and aging on sentence-level time-gated word recognition.

Authors:  Michelle R Molis; Sean D Kampel; Garnett P McMillan; Frederick J Gallun; Serena M Dann; Dawn Konrad-Martin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  The role of the arcuate and middle longitudinal fasciculi in speech perception in noise in adulthood.

Authors:  Pascale Tremblay; Maxime Perron; Isabelle Deschamps; Dan Kennedy-Higgins; Jean-Christophe Houde; Anthony Steven Dick; Maxime Descoteaux
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Spoken word recognition in toddlers who use cochlear implants.

Authors:  Tina M Grieco-Calub; Jenny R Saffran; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Functional and structural aging of the speech sensorimotor neural system: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence.

Authors:  Pascale Tremblay; Anthony S Dick; Steven L Small
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.