Literature DB >> 24793681

Evidence for the automatic processing of prelexical codes in an orthographic but not a phonological task.

Louisa M Slowiaczek1, Todd A Kahan.   

Abstract

The automatic activation of phonological and orthographic information in auditory and visual word processing was examined using a task-set procedure. Participants engaged in a phonological task (i.e., determining whether the letter "a" in a word sounded like /e/ or /æ/) or an orthographic task (i.e., determining whether the sound /s/ in a word was spelled with an "s" or a "c"). Participants were cued regarding which task to perform simultaneously with, or 750 ms before, a clear or degraded target. The stimulus clarity effect (i.e., clear words responded to faster than degraded words) was absorbed into the time that it took participants to identify the task on the basis of the cue in a simultaneous cue-target as compared to a delayed cue-target condition, but only for the orthographic task. These data are consistent with the claim that prelexical processing occurs in a capacity-free manner upon stimulus presentation when participants are trying to extract orthographic codes from words presented in the visual and auditory modalities. Such affirmative data were not obtained when participants attempted to extract phonological codes from words, since here the effects of stimulus clarity and cue delay were additive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24793681     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0638-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  20 in total

1.  Separable processing of consonants and vowels.

Authors:  A Caramazza; D Chialant; R Capasso; G Miceli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-27       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The processing of consonants and vowels in reading: evidence from the fast priming paradigm.

Authors:  Hye-Won Lee; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

3.  Neighbourhood density effects in reading aloud: new insights from simulations with the DRC model.

Authors:  Michael Reynolds; Derek Besner
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2002-12

4.  Stimulus-response compatible orienting and the effect of an action not taken: perception delayed is automaticity denied.

Authors:  Derek Besner; Evan F Risko
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

5.  A role for set when naming Arabic numerals: how intentionality limits (putatively automatic) performance.

Authors:  Imran Ansari; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

6.  On the role of set when reading aloud: a dissociation between prelexical and lexical processing.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Paulitzki; Evan F Risko; Shannon O'Malley; Jennifer A Stolz; Derek Besner
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2009-01-13

7.  Are vowels and consonants processed differently? Event-related potential evidence with a delayed letter paradigm.

Authors:  Manuel Carreiras; Margaret Gillon-Dowens; Marta Vergara; Manuel Perea
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Are visual features of a looming or receding object processed in a capacity-free manner?

Authors:  Todd A Kahan; Sean M Colligan; John N Wiedman
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2011-02-21

9.  The processing of consonants and vowels during letter identity and letter position assignment in visual-word recognition: an ERP study.

Authors:  Marta Vergara-Martínez; Manuel Perea; Alejandro Marín; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Finding words and rules in a speech stream: functional differences between vowels and consonants.

Authors:  Juan M Toro; Marina Nespor; Jacques Mehler; Luca L Bonatti
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.