Literature DB >> 18271861

Finding words and rules in a speech stream: functional differences between vowels and consonants.

Juan M Toro1, Marina Nespor, Jacques Mehler, Luca L Bonatti.   

Abstract

We have proposed that consonants give cues primarily about the lexicon, whereas vowels carry cues about syntax. In a study supporting this hypothesis, we showed that when segmenting words from an artificial continuous stream, participants compute statistical relations over consonants, but not over vowels. In the study reported here, we tested the symmetrical hypothesis that when participants listen to words in a speech stream, they tend to exploit relations among vowels to extract generalizations, but tend to disregard the same relations among consonants. In our streams, participants could segment words on the basis of transitional probabilities in one tier and could extract a structural regularity in the other tier. Participants used consonants to extract words, but vowels to extract a structural generalization. They were unable to extract the same generalization using consonants, even when word segmentation was facilitated and the generalization made simpler. Our results suggest that different signal-driven computations prime lexical and grammatical processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18271861     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02059.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  29 in total

1.  Different timescales for the neural coding of consonant and vowel sounds.

Authors:  Claudia A Perez; Crystal T Engineer; Vikram Jakkamsetti; Ryan S Carraway; Matthew S Perry; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Conditional recall and the frequency effect in the serial recall task: an examination of item-to-item associativity.

Authors:  Leonie M Miller; Steven Roodenrys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-11

3.  Perceptual contributions to monosyllabic word intelligibility: segmental, lexical, and noise replacement factors.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perceptual contributions of the consonant-vowel boundary to sentence intelligibility.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Cross-language differences in cue use for speech segmentation.

Authors:  Michael D Tyler; Anne Cutler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Newborn's brain activity signals the origin of word memories.

Authors:  Silvia Benavides-Varela; Jean-Rémy Hochmann; Francesco Macagno; Marina Nespor; Jacques Mehler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Diane Kewley-Port; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jayne B Ahlstrom; William J Bologna; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Bayesian learning and the psychology of rule induction.

Authors:  Ansgar D Endress
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-03-01

10.  Syntactic learning by mere exposure--an ERP study in adult learners.

Authors:  Jutta L Mueller; Regine Oberecker; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.