Literature DB >> 20952050

The processing of consonants and vowels during letter identity and letter position assignment in visual-word recognition: an ERP study.

Marta Vergara-Martínez1, Manuel Perea, Alejandro Marín, Manuel Carreiras.   

Abstract

Recent research suggests that there is a processing distinction between consonants and vowels in visual-word recognition. Here we conjointly examine the time course of consonants and vowels in processes of letter identity and letter position assignment. Event related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while participants read words and pseudowords in a lexical decision task. The stimuli were displayed under different conditions in a masked priming paradigm with a 50-ms SOA: (i) identity/baseline condition e.g., chocolate-CHOCOLATE); (ii) vowels-delayed condition (e.g., choc_l_te-CHOCOLATE); (iii) consonants-delayed condition (cho_o_ate-CHOCOLATE); (iv) consonants-transposed condition (cholocate-CHOCOLATE); (v) vowels-transposed condition (chocalote-CHOCOLATE), and (vi) unrelated condition (editorial-CHOCOLATE). Results showed earlier ERP effects and longer reaction times for the delayed-letter compared to the transposed-letter conditions. Furthermore, at early stages of processing, consonants may play a greater role during letter identity processing. Differences between vowels and consonants regarding letter position assignment are discussed in terms of a later phonological level involved in lexical retrieval.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20952050     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  7 in total

1.  Orthographic neighborhood density modulates the size of transposed-letter priming effects.

Authors:  Gabriela Meade; Cécile Mahnich; Phillip J Holcomb; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Orthographic neighborhood effects as a function of word frequency: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Marta Vergara-Martínez; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Do Morphemes Matter when Reading Compound Words with Transposed Letters? Evidence from Eye-Tracking and Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Mallory C Stites; Kara D Federmeier; Kiel Christianson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  Evidence for the automatic processing of prelexical codes in an orthographic but not a phonological task.

Authors:  Louisa M Slowiaczek; Todd A Kahan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

5.  What causes the greater perceived similarity of consonant-transposed nonwords?

Authors:  Teresa Schubert; Sachiko Kinoshita; Dennis Norris
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  How are visual words represented? Insights from EEG-based visual word decoding, feature derivation and image reconstruction.

Authors:  Shouyu Ling; Andy C H Lee; Blair C Armstrong; Adrian Nestor
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Tracking the emergence of the consonant bias in visual-word recognition: evidence with developing readers.

Authors:  Ana Paula Soares; Manuel Perea; Montserrat Comesaña
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.