Literature DB >> 21334924

Are visual features of a looming or receding object processed in a capacity-free manner?

Todd A Kahan1, Sean M Colligan, John N Wiedman.   

Abstract

Numerous experiments have examined whether moving stimuli capture spatial attention but none have sought to determine whether visual features of looming and receding objects are extracted in a capacity-free manner. The current experiment (N=28) used the task-choice procedure originated by Besner and Care (2003) to examine this possibility. Stimuli were presented in 3D space by manipulating retinal disparity. Results indicate that features of an object are extracted in a capacity-free manner for both looming and receding objects for participants who consciously perceive motion but not for participants who do not consciously perceive motion. These results suggest that the cognitive system is biased to process potentially animate objects, perhaps because of the evolutionary advantage this cognitive ability may provide.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21334924     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  2 in total

1.  Bodily movement of approach is detected faster than that of receding.

Authors:  Hirokazu Doi; Kazuyuki Shinohara
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

2.  Evidence for the automatic processing of prelexical codes in an orthographic but not a phonological task.

Authors:  Louisa M Slowiaczek; Todd A Kahan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.