Literature DB >> 16082805

Stimulus-response compatible orienting and the effect of an action not taken: perception delayed is automaticity denied.

Derek Besner1, Evan F Risko.   

Abstract

Orienting to a signal source is widely viewed as automatic in the sense that it is triggered by the stimulus. However, this behavior is typically assessed in a context in which the subject knows beforehand what he or she has to do. In the present experiments, the role of task set was investigated by having the response vary randomly from trial to trial. On some trials, a cue signaled the subject to respond, and on the remaining trials, another cue signaled the subject to withhold a response. Stimulus contrast and temporal overlap between task cue and target were manipulated. The effect of a reduction in stimulus contrast was sometimes absorbed into the time taken to decode the cue, but critically, other times not. These results highlight the theoretical importance of considering task set as an essential element in processing, and they undermine the theoretical claim that putatively automatic processes are not subject to interference from other mental activities.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16082805     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  10 in total

1.  Semantic processing in visual word recognition: activation blocking and domain specificity.

Authors:  M S Brown; M A Roberts; D Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

2.  Modulating semantic feedback in visual word recognition.

Authors:  M C Smith; D Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

3.  Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"?

Authors:  Tracy L Brown; Christopher L Gore; Thomas H Carr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-06

4.  Hypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference.

Authors:  Amir Raz; Theodore Shapiro; Jin Fan; Michael I Posner
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2002-12

5.  A paradigm for exploring what the mind does while deciding what it should do.

Authors:  Derek Besner; Stephanie Care
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2003-12

6.  Clever homunculus: is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure?

Authors:  Gordon D Logan; Claus Bundesen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Absence of perceptual processing during reconfiguration of task set.

Authors:  Chris Oriet; Pierre Jolcoeur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Levels of representation in visual word recognition: a dissociation between morphological and semantic processing.

Authors:  J A Stolz; D Besner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.

Authors:  S Kornblum; T Hasbroucq; A Osman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 10.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory.

Authors:  H Pashler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 17.737

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  A role for set when naming Arabic numerals: how intentionality limits (putatively automatic) performance.

Authors:  Imran Ansari; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

2.  Reflexive activation of newly instructed stimulus-response rules: evidence from lateralized readiness potentials in no-go trials.

Authors:  Nachshon Meiran; Maayan Pereg; Yoav Kessler; Michael W Cole; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Evidence for the automatic processing of prelexical codes in an orthographic but not a phonological task.

Authors:  Louisa M Slowiaczek; Todd A Kahan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.