Literature DB >> 24772203

Analyzing Spatial Heterogeneity in DCE- and DW-MRI Parametric Maps to Optimize Prediction of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

Xia Li1, Hakmook Kang2, Lori R Arlinghaus1, Richard G Abramson3, A Bapsi Chakravarthy4, Vandana G Abramson5, Jaime Farley5, Melinda Sanders6, Thomas E Yankeelov7.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the ability of multivariate analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) parametric maps, obtained early in the course of therapy, to predict which patients will achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) at the time of surgery. Thirty-three patients underwent DCE-MRI (to estimate K (trans), v e, k ep, and v p) and DW-MRI [to estimate the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)] at baseline (t 1) and after the first cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (t 2). Four analyses were performed and evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to test their ability to predict pCR. First, a region of interest (ROI) level analysis input the mean K (trans), v e, k ep, v p, and ADC into the logistic model. Second, a voxel-based analysis was performed in which a longitudinal registration algorithm aligned serial parameters to a common space for each patient. The voxels with an increase in k ep, K (trans), and v p or a decrease in ADC or v e were then detected and input into the regression model. In the third analysis, both the ROI and voxel level data were included in the regression model. In the fourth analysis, the ROI and voxel level data were combined with selected clinical data in the regression model. The overfitting-corrected area under the ROC curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was then calculated to evaluate the performance of the four analyses. The combination of k ep, ADC ROI, and voxel level data achieved the best AUC (95% CI) of 0.87 (0.77-0.98).

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24772203      PMCID: PMC3998687          DOI: 10.1593/tlo.13748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1936-5233            Impact factor:   4.243


  34 in total

1.  Effects of cell volume fraction changes on apparent diffusion in human cells.

Authors:  A W Anderson; J Xie; J Pizzonia; R A Bronen; D D Spencer; J C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information.

Authors:  F Maes; A Collignon; D Vandermeulen; G Marchal; P Suetens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Monitoring breast cancer response to neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy using parametric contrast-enhanced MRI: a pilot study.

Authors:  Chen-Pin Chou; Ming-Ting Wu; Hong-Tai Chang; Yu-Shin Lo; Huay-Ben Pan; Hadassa Degani; Edna Furman-Haran
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer.

Authors:  Xia Li; E Brian Welch; Lori R Arlinghaus; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Lei Xu; Jaime Farley; Mary E Loveless; Ingrid A Mayer; Mark C Kelley; Ingrid M Meszoely; Julie A Means-Powell; Vandana G Abramson; Ana M Grau; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Prospective analysis of parametric response map-derived MRI biomarkers: identification of early and distinct glioma response patterns not predicted by standard radiographic assessment.

Authors:  Craig J Galbán; Thomas L Chenevert; Charles R Meyer; Christina Tsien; Theodore S Lawrence; Daniel A Hamstra; Larry Junck; Pia C Sundgren; Timothy D Johnson; Stefanie Galbán; Judith S Sebolt-Leopold; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Prediction of clinicopathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy at contrast-enhanced MR imaging: initial clinical results.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Carmel Hayes; Laura Assersohn; Trevor Powles; Andreas Makris; John Suckling; Martin O Leach; Janet E Husband
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Monitoring response to primary chemotherapy in breast cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Laura Martincich; Filippo Montemurro; Giovanni De Rosa; Vincenzo Marra; Riccardo Ponzone; Stefano Cirillo; Marco Gatti; Nicoletta Biglia; Ivana Sarotto; Piero Sismondi; Daniele Regge; Massimo Aglietta
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Predicting survival and early clinical response to primary chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced breast cancer using DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Roar Johansen; Line R Jensen; Jana Rydland; Pål E Goa; Kjell A Kvistad; Tone F Bathen; David E Axelson; Steinar Lundgren; Ingrid S Gribbestad
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  DCE-MRI analysis methods for predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: pilot study findings.

Authors:  Xia Li; Lori R Arlinghaus; Gregory D Ayers; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Richard G Abramson; Vandana G Abramson; Nkiruka Atuegwu; Jaime Farley; Ingrid A Mayer; Mark C Kelley; Ingrid M Meszoely; Julie Means-Powell; Ana M Grau; Melinda Sanders; Sandeep R Bhave; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  23 in total

1.  Three-dimensional Image-based Mechanical Modeling for Predicting the Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Jared A Weis; Michael I Miga; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 6.756

2.  Combining multiparametric MRI with receptor information to optimize prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: preliminary results.

Authors:  Hakmook Kang; Allison Hainline; Lori R Arlinghaus; Stephanie Elderidge; Xia Li; Vandana G Abramson; Anuradha Bapsi Chakravarthy; Richard G Abramson; Brian Bingham; Kareem Fakhoury; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-12-29

Review 3.  Imaging Considerations and Interprofessional Opportunities in the Care of Breast Cancer Patients in the Neoadjuvant Setting.

Authors:  Anna G Sorace; Sara Harvey; Anum Syed; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.315

Review 4.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and tumor forecasting of breast cancer patients in the community setting.

Authors:  Angela M Jarrett; Anum S Kazerouni; Chengyue Wu; John Virostko; Anna G Sorace; Julie C DiCarlo; David A Hormuth; David A Ekrut; Debra Patt; Boone Goodgame; Sarah Avery; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  The effects of intravoxel contrast agent diffusion on the analysis of DCE-MRI data in realistic tissue domains.

Authors:  Ryan T Woodall; Stephanie L Barnes; David A Hormuth; Anna G Sorace; C Chad Quarles; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Predicting the Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Therapy Using a Mechanically Coupled Reaction-Diffusion Model.

Authors:  Jared A Weis; Michael I Miga; Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; Vandana Abramson; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Praveen Pendyala; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Correlation of tumor characteristics derived from DCE-MRI and DW-MRI with histology in murine models of breast cancer.

Authors:  Stephanie L Barnes; Anna G Sorace; Mary E Loveless; Jennifer G Whisenant; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Incorporating drug delivery into an imaging-driven, mechanics-coupled reaction diffusion model for predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: theory and preliminary clinical results.

Authors:  Angela M Jarrett; David A Hormuth; Stephanie L Barnes; Xinzeng Feng; Wei Huang; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Mean Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Is a Sufficient Conventional Diffusion-weighted MRI Metric to Improve Breast MRI Diagnostic Performance: Results from the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group A6702 Diffusion Imaging Trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth S McDonald; Justin Romanoff; Habib Rahbar; Averi E Kitsch; Sara M Harvey; Jennifer G Whisenant; Thomas E Yankeelov; Linda Moy; Wendy B DeMartini; Basak E Dogan; Wei T Yang; Lilian C Wang; Bonnie N Joe; Lisa J Wilmes; Nola M Hylton; Karen Y Oh; Luminita A Tudorica; Colleen H Neal; Dariya I Malyarenko; Christopher E Comstock; Mitchell D Schnall; Thomas L Chenevert; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Quantitative imaging biomarkers alliance (QIBA) recommendations for improved precision of DWI and DCE-MRI derived biomarkers in multicenter oncology trials.

Authors:  Amita Shukla-Dave; Nancy A Obuchowski; Thomas L Chenevert; Sachin Jambawalikar; Lawrence H Schwartz; Dariya Malyarenko; Wei Huang; Susan M Noworolski; Robert J Young; Mark S Shiroishi; Harrison Kim; Catherine Coolens; Hendrik Laue; Caroline Chung; Mark Rosen; Michael Boss; Edward F Jackson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.119

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.