Literature DB >> 34552262

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and tumor forecasting of breast cancer patients in the community setting.

Angela M Jarrett1,2, Anum S Kazerouni3,4, Chengyue Wu1, John Virostko2,5,6, Anna G Sorace7,8,9, Julie C DiCarlo1,2, David A Hormuth1,2, David A Ekrut1, Debra Patt10, Boone Goodgame6,11,12, Sarah Avery13, Thomas E Yankeelov14,15,16,17,18,19.   

Abstract

This protocol describes a complete data acquisition, analysis and computational forecasting pipeline for employing quantitative MRI data to predict the response of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant therapy in a community-based care setting. The methodology has previously been successfully applied to a heterogeneous patient population. The protocol details how to acquire the necessary images followed by registration, segmentation, quantitative perfusion and diffusion analysis, model calibration, and prediction. The data collection portion of the protocol requires ~25 min of scanning, postprocessing requires 2-3 h, and the model calibration and prediction components require ~10 h per patient depending on tumor size. The response of individual breast cancer patients to neoadjuvant therapy is forecast by application of a biophysical, reaction-diffusion mathematical model to these data. Successful application of the protocol results in coregistered MRI data from at least two scan visits that quantifies an individual tumor's size, cellularity and vascular properties. This enables a spatially resolved prediction of how a particular patient's tumor will respond to therapy. Expertise in image acquisition and analysis, as well as the numerical solution of partial differential equations, is required to carry out this protocol.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34552262     DOI: 10.1038/s41596-021-00617-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Protoc        ISSN: 1750-2799            Impact factor:   13.491


  102 in total

1.  Realistic simulation of the 3-D growth of brain tumors in MR images coupling diffusion with biomechanical deformation.

Authors:  Olivier Clatz; Maxime Sermesant; Pierre-Yves Bondiau; Hervé Delingette; Simon K Warfield; Grégoire Malandain; Nicholas Ayache
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Clinically relevant modeling of tumor growth and treatment response.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; Nkiruka Atuegwu; David Hormuth; Jared A Weis; Stephanie L Barnes; Michael I Miga; Erin C Rericha; Vito Quaranta
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Brain glioma growth model using reaction-diffusion equation with viscous stress tensor on brain MR images.

Authors:  Jianjun Yuan; Lipei Liu
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Predicting the efficacy of radiotherapy in individual glioblastoma patients in vivo: a mathematical modeling approach.

Authors:  R Rockne; J K Rockhill; M Mrugala; A M Spence; I Kalet; K Hendrickson; A Lai; T Cloughesy; E C Alvord; K R Swanson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Computer simulations suggest that prostate enlargement due to benign prostatic hyperplasia mechanically impedes prostate cancer growth.

Authors:  Guillermo Lorenzo; Thomas J R Hughes; Pablo Dominguez-Frojan; Alessandro Reali; Hector Gomez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Toward a science of tumor forecasting for clinical oncology.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; Vito Quaranta; Katherine J Evans; Erin C Rericha
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  The biology and mathematical modelling of glioma invasion: a review.

Authors:  J C L Alfonso; K Talkenberger; M Seifert; B Klink; A Hawkins-Daarud; K R Swanson; H Hatzikirou; A Deutsch
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Kidney tumor growth prediction by coupling reaction-diffusion and biomechanical model.

Authors:  Xinjian Chen; Ronald M Summers; Jianhua Yao
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Tissue-scale, personalized modeling and simulation of prostate cancer growth.

Authors:  Guillermo Lorenzo; Michael A Scott; Kevin Tew; Thomas J R Hughes; Yongjie Jessica Zhang; Lei Liu; Guillermo Vilanova; Hector Gomez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  The 2019 mathematical oncology roadmap.

Authors:  Russell C Rockne; Andrea Hawkins-Daarud; Kristin R Swanson; James P Sluka; James A Glazier; Paul Macklin; David A Hormuth; Angela M Jarrett; Ernesto A B F Lima; J Tinsley Oden; George Biros; Thomas E Yankeelov; Kit Curtius; Ibrahim Al Bakir; Dominik Wodarz; Natalia Komarova; Luis Aparicio; Mykola Bordyuh; Raul Rabadan; Stacey D Finley; Heiko Enderling; Jimmy Caudell; Eduardo G Moros; Alexander R A Anderson; Robert A Gatenby; Artem Kaznatcheev; Peter Jeavons; Nikhil Krishnan; Julia Pelesko; Raoul R Wadhwa; Nara Yoon; Daniel Nichol; Andriy Marusyk; Michael Hinczewski; Jacob G Scott
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.959

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Multi-Compartment Model of Glioma Response to Fractionated Radiation Therapy Parameterized via Time-Resolved Microscopy Data.

Authors:  Junyan Liu; David A Hormuth; Jianchen Yang; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  MRI-Based Digital Models Forecast Patient-Specific Treatment Responses to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Chengyue Wu; Angela M Jarrett; Zijian Zhou; Nabil Elshafeey; Beatriz E Adrada; Rosalind P Candelaria; Rania M M Mohamed; Medine Boge; Lei Huo; Jason B White; Debu Tripathy; Vicente Valero; Jennifer K Litton; Clinton Yam; Jong Bum Son; Jingfei Ma; Gaiane M Rauch; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 13.312

3.  Quantitative multiparametric MRI predicts response to neoadjuvant therapy in the community setting.

Authors:  John Virostko; Anna G Sorace; Kalina P Slavkova; Anum S Kazerouni; Angela M Jarrett; Julie C DiCarlo; Stefanie Woodard; Sarah Avery; Boone Goodgame; Debra Patt; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 6.466

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.