Literature DB >> 21841212

A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer.

Xia Li1, E Brian Welch, Lori R Arlinghaus, A Bapsi Chakravarthy, Lei Xu, Jaime Farley, Mary E Loveless, Ingrid A Mayer, Mark C Kelley, Ingrid M Meszoely, Julie A Means-Powell, Vandana G Abramson, Ana M Grau, John C Gore, Thomas E Yankeelov.   

Abstract

Quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) data requires the accurate determination of the arterial input function (AIF). A novel method for obtaining the AIF is presented here and pharmacokinetic parameters derived from individual and population-based AIFs are then compared. A Philips 3.0 T Achieva MR scanner was used to obtain 20 DCE-MRI data sets from ten breast cancer patients prior to and after one cycle of chemotherapy. Using a semi-automated method to estimate the AIF from the axillary artery, we obtain the AIF for each patient, AIF(ind), and compute a population-averaged AIF, AIF(pop). The extended standard model is used to estimate the physiological parameters using the two types of AIFs. The mean concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) for the AIFs segmented manually and by the proposed AIF tracking approach is 0.96, indicating accurate and automatic tracking of an AIF in DCE-MRI data of the breast is possible. Regarding the kinetic parameters, the CCC values for K(trans), v(p) and v(e) as estimated by AIF(ind) and AIF(pop) are 0.65, 0.74 and 0.31, respectively, based on the region of interest analysis. The average CCC values for the voxel-by-voxel analysis are 0.76, 0.84 and 0.68 for K(trans), v(p) and v(e), respectively. This work indicates that K(trans) and v(p) show good agreement between AIF(pop) and AIF(ind) while there is a weak agreement on v(e).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21841212      PMCID: PMC3176673          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/17/018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  29 in total

1.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Evidence for shutter-speed variation in CR bolus-tracking studies of human pathology.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; William D Rooney; Wei Huang; Jonathan P Dyke; Xin Li; Alina Tudorica; Jing-Huei Lee; Jason A Koutcher; Charles S Springer
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Breast MR imaging at 3T.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.266

4.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

Authors:  L I Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Sensitivity of quantitative metrics derived from DCE MRI and a pharmacokinetic model to image quality and acquisition parameters.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Diana Li; Zhou Shen; Daniel Normolle
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Evaluation of the functional diffusion map as an early biomarker of time-to-progression and overall survival in high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Daniel A Hamstra; Thomas L Chenevert; Bradford A Moffat; Timothy D Johnson; Charles R Meyer; Suresh K Mukherji; Douglas J Quint; Stephen S Gebarski; Xiaoying Fan; Christina I Tsien; Theodore S Lawrence; Larry Junck; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Pharmacokinetic mapping for lesion classification in dynamic breast MRI.

Authors:  Matthias C Schabel; Glen R Morrell; Karen Y Oh; Cheryl A Walczak; R Brad Barlow; Leigh A Neumayer
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  Functional tumor imaging with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Peter L Choyke; Andrew J Dwyer; Michael V Knopp
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease.

Authors:  E Henderson; B K Rutt; T Y Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Variation of the relaxographic "shutter-speed" for transcytolemmal water exchange affects the CR bolus-tracking curve shape.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; William D Rooney; Xin Li; Charles S Springer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  33 in total

1.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for predicting pathological response after the first cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Xia Li; Richard G Abramson; Lori R Arlinghaus; Hakmook Kang; Anuradha Bapsi Chakravarthy; Vandana G Abramson; Jaime Farley; Ingrid A Mayer; Mark C Kelley; Ingrid M Meszoely; Julie Means-Powell; Ana M Grau; Melinda Sanders; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Jacob Fluckiger; Gregory D Ayers; Xia Li; Sandeep N Gupta; Clare Tempany; Robert Mulkern; Thomas E Yankeelov; Fiona M Fennessy
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Longitudinal, intermodality registration of quantitative breast PET and MRI data acquired before and during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: preliminary results.

Authors:  Nkiruka C Atuegwu; Xia Li; Lori R Arlinghaus; Richard G Abramson; Jason M Williams; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Vandana G Abramson; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer clinical trials: potential roles and possible pitfalls.

Authors:  Fiona M Fennessy; Rana R McKay; Clair J Beard; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

5.  Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer DCE-MRI at 3T: comparison of two arterial input functions on cancer detection with digitized whole mount histopathological validation.

Authors:  Fiona M Fennessy; Andriy Fedorov; Tobias Penzkofer; Kyung Won Kim; Michelle S Hirsch; Mark G Vangel; Paul Masry; Trevor A Flood; Ming-Ching Chang; Clare M Tempany; Robert V Mulkern; Sandeep N Gupta
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Distinguishing benign and malignant breast tumors: preliminary comparison of kinetic modeling approaches using multi-institutional dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data from the International Breast MR Consortium 6883 trial.

Authors:  Anna G Sorace; Savannah C Partridge; Xia Li; Jack Virostko; Stephanie L Barnes; Daniel S Hippe; Wei Huang; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-01-22

7.  Semiautomatic determination of arterial input function in DCE-MRI of the abdomen.

Authors:  Harrison Kim; Desiree E Morgan
Journal:  J Biomed Eng Med Imaging       Date:  2017-04-28

8.  Analyzing Spatial Heterogeneity in DCE- and DW-MRI Parametric Maps to Optimize Prediction of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Xia Li; Hakmook Kang; Lori R Arlinghaus; Richard G Abramson; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Vandana G Abramson; Jaime Farley; Melinda Sanders; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

9.  Whole-lesion histogram and texture analyses of breast lesions on inline quantitative DCE mapping with CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE.

Authors:  Kun Sun; Hong Zhu; Weimin Chai; Ying Zhan; Dominik Nickel; Robert Grimm; Caixia Fu; Fuhua Yan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Assessment of a simplified spin and gradient echo (sSAGE) approach for human brain tumor perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Ashley M Stokes; Jack T Skinner; Thomas Yankeelov; C Chad Quarles
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.