Literature DB >> 29322067

Combining multiparametric MRI with receptor information to optimize prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: preliminary results.

Hakmook Kang1,2, Allison Hainline1, Lori R Arlinghaus3, Stephanie Elderidge4,5, Xia Li6, Vandana G Abramson7,8, Anuradha Bapsi Chakravarthy7,9, Richard G Abramson2,10, Brian Bingham11, Kareem Fakhoury11, Thomas E Yankeelov4,5.   

Abstract

Pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is used as a short-term surrogate marker of eventual outcome in patients with breast cancer. Analyzing voxel-level heterogeneity in MRI-derived parametric maps, obtained before and after the first cycle of NAT ([Formula: see text]), in conjunction with receptor status, may improve the predictive accuracy of tumor response to NAT. Toward that end, we incorporated two MRI-derived parameters, the apparent diffusion coefficient and efflux rate constant, with receptor status in a logistic ridge-regression model. The area under the curve (AUC) and Brier score of the model computed via 10-fold cross validation were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.99) and 0.11 (95% CI: 0.06, 0.16), respectively. These two statistics strongly support the hypothesis that our proposed model outperforms the other models that we investigated (namely, models without either receptor information or voxel-level information). The contribution of the receptor information was manifested by an 8% to 15% increase in AUC and a 14% to 21% decrease in Brier score. These data indicate that combining multiparametric MRI with hormone receptor status has a high likelihood of improved prediction of pathologic response to NAT in breast cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diffusion-weighted-magnetic resonance imaging; dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging; imaging biomarkers of response; predictive value of tests; quantitative imaging; spatial heterogeneity

Year:  2017        PMID: 29322067      PMCID: PMC5747275          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.011015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  49 in total

1.  Effects of cell volume fraction changes on apparent diffusion in human cells.

Authors:  A W Anderson; J Xie; J Pizzonia; R A Bronen; D D Spencer; J C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Demonstration of accuracy and clinical versatility of mutual information for automatic multimodality image fusion using affine and thin-plate spline warped geometric deformations.

Authors:  C R Meyer; J L Boes; B Kim; P H Bland; K R Zasadny; P V Kison; K Koral; K A Frey; R L Wahl
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Machine learning for predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Subramani Mani; Yukun Chen; Xia Li; Lori Arlinghaus; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Vandana Abramson; Sandeep R Bhave; Mia A Levy; Hua Xu; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: prediction of pathologic response with PET/CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging--prospective assessment.

Authors:  Ukihide Tateishi; Mototaka Miyake; Tomoaki Nagaoka; Takashi Terauchi; Kazunori Kubota; Takayuki Kinoshita; Hiromitsu Daisaki; Homer A Macapinlac
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Intratumor partitioning and texture analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI identifies relevant tumor subregions to predict pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Guanghua Gong; Yi Cui; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Evaluation of the functional diffusion map as an early biomarker of time-to-progression and overall survival in high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Daniel A Hamstra; Thomas L Chenevert; Bradford A Moffat; Timothy D Johnson; Charles R Meyer; Suresh K Mukherji; Douglas J Quint; Stephen S Gebarski; Xiaoying Fan; Christina I Tsien; Theodore S Lawrence; Larry Junck; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Prediction of clinicopathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy at contrast-enhanced MR imaging: initial clinical results.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Carmel Hayes; Laura Assersohn; Trevor Powles; Andreas Makris; John Suckling; Martin O Leach; Janet E Husband
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Evaluating the diagnostic sensitivity of computed diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth A M O'Flynn; Matthew Blackledge; David Collins; Katherine Downey; Simon Doran; Hardik Patel; Sam Dumonteil; Wing Mok; Martin O Leach; Dow-Mu Koh
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy adaptation and serial MRI response monitoring in ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  L S Rigter; C E Loo; S C Linn; G S Sonke; E van Werkhoven; E H Lips; H A Warnars; P K Doll; A Bruining; I A Mandjes; M J Vrancken Peeters; J Wesseling; K G Gilhuijs; S Rodenhuis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Spatiotemporal switching signals for cancer stem cell activation in pediatric origins of adulthood cancer: Towards a watch-and-wait lifetime strategy for cancer treatment.

Authors:  Shengwen Calvin Li; Mustafa H Kabeer
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 2.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Translational Research in Oncology.

Authors:  Maria Felicia Fiordelisi; Carlo Cavaliere; Luigi Auletta; Luca Basso; Marco Salvatore
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Quantitative Comparison of Prone and Supine PERCIST Measurements in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer G Whisenant; Jason M Williams; Hakmook Kang; Lori R Arlinghaus; Richard G Abramson; Vandana G Abramson; Kareem Fakhoury; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2020-06

4.  Texture Analysis of F-18 Fluciclovine PET/CT to Predict Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Initial Results.

Authors:  Hakmook Kang; E Edmund Kim; Sepideh Shokouhi; Kenneth Tokita; Hye-Won Shin
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2020-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.