Literature DB >> 29697054

Incorporating drug delivery into an imaging-driven, mechanics-coupled reaction diffusion model for predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: theory and preliminary clinical results.

Angela M Jarrett1, David A Hormuth, Stephanie L Barnes, Xinzeng Feng, Wei Huang, Thomas E Yankeelov.   

Abstract

Clinical methods for assessing tumor response to therapy are largely rudimentary, monitoring only temporal changes in tumor size. Our goal is to predict the response of breast tumors to therapy using a mathematical model that utilizes magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data obtained non-invasively from individual patients. We extended a previously established, mechanically coupled, reaction-diffusion model for predicting tumor response initialized with patient-specific diffusion weighted MRI (DW-MRI) data by including the effects of chemotherapy drug delivery, which is estimated using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-) MRI data. The extended, drug incorporated, model is initialized using patient-specific DW-MRI and DCE-MRI data. Data sets from five breast cancer patients were used-obtained before, after one cycle, and at mid-point of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The DCE-MRI data was used to estimate spatiotemporal variations in tumor perfusion with the extended Kety-Tofts model. The physiological parameters derived from DCE-MRI were used to model changes in delivery of therapy drugs within the tumor for incorporation in the extended model. We simulated the original model and the extended model in both 2D and 3D and compare the results for this five-patient cohort. Preliminary results show reductions in the error of model predicted tumor cellularity and size compared to the experimentally-measured results for the third MRI scan when therapy was incorporated. Comparing the two models for agreement between the predicted total cellularity and the calculated total cellularity (from the DW-MRI data) reveals an increased concordance correlation coefficient from 0.81 to 0.98 for the 2D analysis and 0.85 to 0.99 for the 3D analysis (p  <  0.01 for each) when the extended model was used in place of the original model. This study demonstrates the plausibility of using DCE-MRI data as a means to estimate drug delivery on a patient-specific basis in predictive models and represents a step toward the goal of achieving individualized prediction of tumor response to therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29697054      PMCID: PMC5985823          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aac040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  52 in total

1.  Effects of cell volume fraction changes on apparent diffusion in human cells.

Authors:  A W Anderson; J Xie; J Pizzonia; R A Bronen; D D Spencer; J C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas.

Authors:  T Sugahara; Y Korogi; M Kochi; I Ikushima; Y Shigematu; T Hirai; T Okuda; L Liang; Y Ge; Y Komohara; Y Ushio; M Takahashi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Three-dimensional Image-based Mechanical Modeling for Predicting the Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Jared A Weis; Michael I Miga; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 6.756

4.  Longitudinal, intermodality registration of quantitative breast PET and MRI data acquired before and during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: preliminary results.

Authors:  Nkiruka C Atuegwu; Xia Li; Lori R Arlinghaus; Richard G Abramson; Jason M Williams; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Vandana G Abramson; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A Patient-Specific Anisotropic Diffusion Model for Brain Tumour Spread.

Authors:  Amanda Swan; Thomas Hillen; John C Bowman; Albert D Murtha
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 1.758

6.  Tumors in pediatric patients at diffusion-weighted MR imaging: apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor cellularity.

Authors:  Paul D Humphries; Neil J Sebire; Marilyn J Siegel; Øystein E Olsen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  An imaging-based tumour growth and treatment response model: investigating the effect of tumour oxygenation on radiation therapy response.

Authors:  Benjamin Titz; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Mathematical modeling predicts synergistic antitumor effects of combining a macrophage-based, hypoxia-targeted gene therapy with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Markus R Owen; I Johanna Stamper; Munitta Muthana; Giles W Richardson; Jon Dobson; Claire E Lewis; Helen M Byrne
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Oxygen-Enhanced MRI Accurately Identifies, Quantifies, and Maps Tumor Hypoxia in Preclinical Cancer Models.

Authors:  James P B O'Connor; Jessica K R Boult; Yann Jamin; Muhammad Babur; Katherine G Finegan; Kaye J Williams; Ross A Little; Alan Jackson; Geoff J M Parker; Andrew R Reynolds; John C Waterton; Simon P Robinson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  Current advances in mathematical modeling of anti-cancer drug penetration into tumor tissues.

Authors:  Munju Kim; Robert J Gillies; Katarzyna A Rejniak
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  17 in total

1.  Calibrating a Predictive Model of Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis with Quantitative MRI.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Angela M Jarrett; Xinzeng Feng; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 2.  Mechanism-Based Modeling of Tumor Growth and Treatment Response Constrained by Multiparametric Imaging Data.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Angela M Jarrett; Ernesto A B F Lima; Matthew T McKenna; David T Fuentes; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-02

3.  A Multi-Compartment Model of Glioma Response to Fractionated Radiation Therapy Parameterized via Time-Resolved Microscopy Data.

Authors:  Junyan Liu; David A Hormuth; Jianchen Yang; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and tumor forecasting of breast cancer patients in the community setting.

Authors:  Angela M Jarrett; Anum S Kazerouni; Chengyue Wu; John Virostko; Anna G Sorace; Julie C DiCarlo; David A Hormuth; David A Ekrut; Debra Patt; Boone Goodgame; Sarah Avery; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 5.  Mathematical models of tumor cell proliferation: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Angela M Jarrett; Ernesto A B F Lima; David A Hormuth; Matthew T McKenna; Xinzeng Feng; David A Ekrut; Anna Claudia M Resende; Amy Brock; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.512

6.  Math, magnets, and medicine: enabling personalized oncology.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Angela M Jarrett; Guillermo Lorenzo; Ernesto A B F Lima; Chengyue Wu; Caroline Chung; Debra Patt; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2021-01-27

7.  Calibration of Multi-Parameter Models of Avascular Tumor Growth Using Time Resolved Microscopy Data.

Authors:  E A B F Lima; N Ghousifam; A Ozkan; J T Oden; A Shahmoradi; M N Rylander; B Wohlmuth; T E Yankeelov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  ePAD: An Image Annotation and Analysis Platform for Quantitative Imaging.

Authors:  Daniel L Rubin; Mete Ugur Akdogan; Cavit Altindag; Emel Alkim
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2019-03

9.  A hybrid model of tumor growth and angiogenesis: In silico experiments.

Authors:  Caleb M Phillips; Ernesto A B F Lima; Ryan T Woodall; Amy Brock; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Modeling of Glioma Growth With Mass Effect by Longitudinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Birkan Tunc; David Hormuth; George Biros; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.