| Literature DB >> 26332194 |
Stephanie L Barnes1,2, Anna G Sorace1,2, Mary E Loveless1,3, Jennifer G Whisenant1,2, Thomas E Yankeelov1,2,3,4,5,6.
Abstract
The purpose of this work was to determine the relationship between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC, from diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI), the extravascular, extracellular volume fraction (ve , from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI), and histological measurement of the extracellular space fraction. Athymic nude mice were injected with either human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) BT474 (n = 15) or triple negative MDA-MB-231 (n = 20) breast cancer cells, treated with either Herceptin (n = 8), Abraxane (low dose n = 7, high dose n = 6), or saline (n = 7 for each cell line), and imaged using DW- and DCE-MRI before, during, and after treatment. After the final imaging acquisition, the tissue was resected and evaluated by histological analysis. H&E-stained central slices were scanned using a digital brightfield microscope and evaluated with thresholding techniques to calculate the extracellular space. For both BT474 and MDA-MB-231, the median ADC of the central slice exhibited a significantly positive correlation with the corresponding central slice extracellular space as measured by H&E (p = 0.03, p < 0.01, respectively). Median ve calculated from the central slice showed differing results between the two cell lines. For BT474, a significant correlation between ve and extracellular space was calculated (p = 0.02), while MDA-MB-231 tumors did not demonstrate a significant correlation (p = 0.64). Additionally, there was no correlation discovered between ADC and ve with either whole tumor analysis or central slice analysis (p > 0.05). While ADC correlates well with the histologically determined fraction of extracellular space, these data add to the growing body of literature that suggests that ve derived from DCE-MRI is not a reliable biomarker of extracellular space for a range of physiological conditions.Entities:
Keywords: apparent diffusion coefficient; extracellular space; extravascular extracellular space; quantitative imaging
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26332194 PMCID: PMC4573954 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3377
Source DB: PubMed Journal: NMR Biomed ISSN: 0952-3480 Impact factor: 4.044