Literature DB >> 24763632

A new sensor for measurement of dynamic contact stress in the hip.

M J Rudert, B J Ellis, C R Henak, N J Stroud, D R Pederson, J A Weiss, T D Brown.   

Abstract

Various techniques exist for quantifying articular contact stress distributions, an important class of measurements in the field of orthopaedic biomechanics. In situations where the need for dynamic recording has been paramount, the approach of preference has involved thin-sheet multiplexed grid-array transducers. To date, these sensors have been used to study contact stresses in the knee, shoulder, ankle, wrist, and spinal facet joints. Until now, however, no such sensor had been available for the human hip joint due to difficulties posed by the deep, bi-curvilinear geometry of the acetabulum. We report here the design and development of a novel sensor capable of measuring dynamic contact stress in human cadaveric hip joints (maximum contact stress of 20 MPa and maximum sampling rate 100 readings/s). Particular emphasis is placed on issues concerning calibration, and on the effect of joint curvature on the sensor's performance. The active pressure-sensing regions of the sensors have the shape of a segment of an annulus with a 150-deg circumferential span, and employ a polar/circumferential "ring-and-spoke" sensel grid layout. There are two sensor sizes, having outside radii of 44 and 48 mm, respectively. The new design was evaluated in human cadaver hip joints using two methods. The stress magnitudes and spatial distribution measured by the sensor were compared to contact stresses measured by pressure sensitive film during static loading conditions that simulated heel strike during walking and stair climbing. Additionally, the forces obtained by spatial integration of the sensor contact stresses were compared to the forces measured by load cells during the static simulations and for loading applied by a dynamic hip simulator. Stress magnitudes and spatial distribution patterns obtained from the sensor versus from pressure sensitive film exhibited good agreement. The joint forces obtained during both static and dynamic loading were within ±10% and ±26%, respectively, of the forces measured by the load cells. These results provide confidence in the measurements obtained by the sensor. The new sensor's real-time output and dynamic measurement capabilities hold significant advantages over static measurements from pressure sensitive film.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24763632      PMCID: PMC5112416          DOI: 10.1115/1.4026103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  14 in total

Review 1.  New methods for assessing cartilage contact stress after articular fracture.

Authors:  Thomas D Brown; M James Rudert; Nicole M Grosland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Effects of idealized joint geometry on finite element predictions of cartilage contact stresses in the hip.

Authors:  Andrew E Anderson; Benjamin J Ellis; Steve A Maas; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Contact stress transients during functional loading of ankle stepoff incongruities.

Authors:  Todd O McKinley; M James Rudert; Daniel C Koos; Douglas R Pedersen; Thomas E Baer; Yuki Tochigi; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Instability-associated changes in contact stress and contact stress rates near a step-off incongruity.

Authors:  Todd O McKinley; Yuki Tochigi; M James Rudert; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Compliance-dependent load allocation between sensing versus non-sensing portions of a sheet-array contact stress sensor.

Authors:  Jordan M Hartmann; M James Rudert; Douglas R Pedersen; Thomas E Baer; Curtis M Goreham-Voss; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2009

6.  The effect of incongruity and instability on contact stress directional gradients in human cadaveric ankles.

Authors:  T O McKinley; Y Tochigi; M J Rudert; T D Brown
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 7.  Joint contact stress: a reasonable surrogate for biological processes?

Authors:  Richard A Brand
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2005

8.  Finite element prediction of cartilage contact stresses in normal human hips.

Authors:  Michael D Harris; Andrew E Anderson; Corinne R Henak; Benjamin J Ellis; Christopher L Peters; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities.

Authors:  G Bergmann; G Deuretzbacher; M Heller; F Graichen; A Rohlmann; J Strauss; G N Duda
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Patient-specific finite element analysis of chronic contact stress exposure after intraarticular fracture of the tibial plafond.

Authors:  Wendy Li; Donald D Anderson; Jane K Goldsworthy; J Lawrence Marsh; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  5 in total

1.  Multiscale cartilage biomechanics: technical challenges in realizing a high-throughput modelling and simulation workflow.

Authors:  Ahmet Erdemir; Craig Bennetts; Sean Davis; Akhil Reddy; Scott Sibole
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 2.  Subject-specific analysis of joint contact mechanics: application to the study of osteoarthritis and surgical planning.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Andrew E Anderson; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Isolated changes in femoral version do not alter intra-articular contact mechanics in cadaveric hips.

Authors:  Alex M Meyer; Holly D Thomas-Aitken; Marc J Brouillette; Robert W Westermann; Jessica E Goetz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  In vitro hip testing in the International Society of Biomechanics coordinate system.

Authors:  Richard J van Arkel; Jonathan R T Jeffers
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Hip Labral Reconstruction With a Polyurethane Scaffold: Restoration of Femoroacetabular Contact Biomechanics.

Authors:  Bruno Capurro; Francisco Reina; Anna Carrera; Joan Carles Monllau; Fernando Marqués-López; Oliver Marín-Peña; Raúl Torres-Eguía; Marc Tey-Pons
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-09-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.