Literature DB >> 11410170

Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities.

G Bergmann1, G Deuretzbacher, M Heller, F Graichen, A Rohlmann, J Strauss, G N Duda.   

Abstract

In vivo loads acting at the hip joint have so far only been measured in few patients and without detailed documentation of gait data. Such information is required to test and improve wear, strength and fixation stability of hip implants. Measurements of hip contact forces with instrumented implants and synchronous analyses of gait patterns and ground reaction forces were performed in four patients during the most frequent activities of daily living. From the individual data sets an average was calculated. The paper focuses on the loading of the femoral implant component but complete data are additionally stored on an associated compact disc. It contains complete gait and hip contact force data as well as calculated muscle activities during walking and stair climbing and the frequencies of daily activities observed in hip patients. The mechanical loading and function of the hip joint and proximal femur is thereby completely documented. The average patient loaded his hip joint with 238% BW (percent of body weight) when walking at about 4 km/h and with slightly less when standing on one leg. This is below the levels previously reported for two other patients (Bergmann et al., Clinical Biomechanics 26 (1993) 969-990). When climbing upstairs the joint contact force is 251% BW which is less than 260% BW when going downstairs. Inwards torsion of the implant is probably critical for the stem fixation. On average it is 23% larger when going upstairs than during normal level walking. The inter- and intra-individual variations during stair climbing are large and the highest torque values are 83% larger than during normal walking. Because the hip joint loading during all other common activities of most hip patients are comparably small (except during stumbling), implants should mainly be tested with loading conditions that mimic walking and stair climbing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11410170     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00040-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  289 in total

1.  Relationships among body weight, joint moments generated during functional activities, and hip bone mass in older adults.

Authors:  Man-Ying Wang; Sean P Flanagan; Joo-Eun Song; Gail A Greendale; George J Salem
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Hip joint contact forces during stumbling.

Authors:  G Bergmann; F Graichen; A Rohlmann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Anatomical and biomechanical investigations of the iliotibial tract.

Authors:  K Birnbaum; C H Siebert; T Pandorf; E Schopphoff; A Prescher; F U Niethard
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 4.  Biomechanics of high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Improved mechanical long-term reliability of hip resurfacing prostheses by using silicon nitride.

Authors:  Wen Zhang; M Titze; B Cappi; D C Wirtz; R Telle; H Fischer
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Gait analysis after total hip replacement with hip resurfacing implant or Mallory-head Exeter prosthesis: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mette K Petersen; Niels T Andersen; Poul Mogensen; Michael Voight; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Study of bone remodeling of two models of femoral cementless stems by means of DEXA and finite elements.

Authors:  Luis Gracia; Elena Ibarz; Sergio Puértolas; José Cegoñino; Fernando López-Prats; Juan J Panisello; Antonio Herrera
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Analysis of sacro-iliac joint screw fixation: does quality of reduction and screw orientation influence joint stability? A biomechanical study.

Authors:  Gaston Camino Willhuber; Ivan Zderic; Florian Gras; Dieter Wahl; Carlos Sancineto; Jorge Barla; Markus Windolf; Robert Geoff Richards; Boyko Gueorguiev
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Predicting long-term wear performance of hard-on-hard bearing couples: effect of cup orientation.

Authors:  S Shankar; K Gowthaman; M S Uddin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Prediction of In Vivo Knee Joint Loads Using a Global Probabilistic Analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro Navacchia; Casey A Myers; Paul J Rullkoetter; Kevin B Shelburne
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.