Literature DB >> 22213112

Finite element prediction of cartilage contact stresses in normal human hips.

Michael D Harris1, Andrew E Anderson, Corinne R Henak, Benjamin J Ellis, Christopher L Peters, Jeffrey A Weiss.   

Abstract

Our objectives were to determine cartilage contact stress during walking, stair climbing, and descending stairs in a well-defined group of normal volunteers and to assess variations in contact stress and area among subjects and across loading scenarios. Ten volunteers without history of hip pain or disease with normal lateral center-edge angle and acetabular index were selected. Computed tomography imaging with contrast was performed on one hip. Bone and cartilage surfaces were segmented from volumetric image data, and subject-specific finite element models were constructed and analyzed using a validated protocol. Acetabular contact stress and area were determined for seven activities. Peak stress ranged from 7.52±2.11 MPa for heel-strike during walking (233% BW) to 8.66 ± 3.01 MPa for heel-strike during descending stairs (261% BW). Average contact area across all activities was 34% of the surface area of the acetabular cartilage. The distribution of contact stress was highly non-uniform, and more variability occurred among subjects for a given activity than among activities for a single subject. The magnitude and area of contact stress were consistent between activities, although inter-activity shifts in contact pattern were found as the direction of loading changed. Relatively small incongruencies between the femoral and acetabular cartilage had a large effect on the contact stresses. These effects tended to persist across all simulated activities. These results demonstrate the diversity and trends in cartilage contact stress in healthy hips during activities of daily living and provide a basis for future comparisons between normal and pathologic hips.
Copyright © 2012 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22213112      PMCID: PMC3348968          DOI: 10.1002/jor.22040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  35 in total

1.  Effects of idealized joint geometry on finite element predictions of cartilage contact stresses in the hip.

Authors:  Andrew E Anderson; Benjamin J Ellis; Steve A Maas; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Role of the acetabular labrum in load support across the hip joint.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Benjamin J Ellis; Michael D Harris; Andrew E Anderson; Christopher L Peters; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Predictors of progression of osteoarthritis in femoroacetabular impingement: a radiological study with a minimum of ten years follow-up.

Authors:  N V Bardakos; R N Villar
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-02

4.  A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; John C Carlisle; Paul E Beaulé; Young-Jo Kim; Robert T Trousdale; Rafael J Sierra; Michael Leunig; Perry L Schoenecker; Michael B Millis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Direct comparison of contact areas, contact stress and subchondral mineralization in human hip joint specimens.

Authors:  R von Eisenhart-Rothe; F Eckstein; M Müller-Gerbl; J Landgraf; C Rock; R Putz
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1997-03

6.  A contact-coupled finite element analysis of the natural adult hip.

Authors:  T D Brown; A M DiGioia
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Contact pressures in the flexed hip joint during lateral trochanteric loading.

Authors:  Damon R Sparks; David P Beason; Brandon S Etheridge; Jorge E Alonso; Alan W Eberhardt
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Acetabular cartilage delamination in femoroacetabular impingement. Risk factors and magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis.

Authors:  Lucas A Anderson; Christopher L Peters; Brandon B Park; Gregory J Stoddard; Jill A Erickson; Julia R Crim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Comparative study of the intrinsic mechanical properties of the human acetabular and femoral head cartilage.

Authors:  K A Athanasiou; A Agarwal; F J Dzida
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Radiographic and patient factors associated with pre-radiographic osteoarthritis in hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Rebecca H Jessel; David Zurakowski; Christoph Zilkens; Deborah Burstein; Martha L Gray; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  53 in total

Review 1.  Multiscale mechanics of articular cartilage: potentials and challenges of coupling musculoskeletal, joint, and microscale computational models.

Authors:  J P Halloran; S Sibole; C C van Donkelaar; M C van Turnhout; C W J Oomens; J A Weiss; F Guilak; A Erdemir
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Is Increased Acetabular Cartilage or Fossa Size Associated With Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement?

Authors:  Stephanie Y Pun; Andreas Hingsammer; Michael B Millis; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Finite element simulation of articular contact mechanics with quadratic tetrahedral elements.

Authors:  Steve A Maas; Benjamin J Ellis; David S Rawlins; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Impact of triple pelvic osteotomy on contact stress pressure distribution in the hip joint.

Authors:  Zoran Vukasinovic; Dusko Spasovski; Veronika Kralj-Iglic; Jelena Marinkovic-Eric; Igor Seslija; Zorica Zivkovic; Vesna Spasovski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Subject-specific analysis of joint contact mechanics: application to the study of osteoarthritis and surgical planning.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Andrew E Anderson; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  In-vivo hip arthrokinematics during supine clinical exams: Application to the study of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Ashley L Kapron; Stephen K Aoki; Christopher L Peters; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Computationally efficient magnetic resonance imaging based surface contact modeling as a tool to evaluate joint injuries and outcomes of surgical interventions compared to finite element modeling.

Authors:  Joshua E Johnson; Phil Lee; Terence E McIff; E Bruce Toby; Kenneth J Fischer
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  A new sensor for measurement of dynamic contact stress in the hip.

Authors:  M J Rudert; B J Ellis; C R Henak; N J Stroud; D R Pederson; J A Weiss; T D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Accuracy and feasibility of dual fluoroscopy and model-based tracking to quantify in vivo hip kinematics during clinical exams.

Authors:  Ashley L Kapron; Stephen K Aoki; Christopher L Peters; Steve A Maas; Michael J Bey; Roger Zauel; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 1.833

10.  Finite element prediction of transchondral stress and strain in the human hip.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Gerard A Ateshian; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.