Literature DB >> 19742084

Compliance-dependent load allocation between sensing versus non-sensing portions of a sheet-array contact stress sensor.

Jordan M Hartmann1, M James Rudert, Douglas R Pedersen, Thomas E Baer, Curtis M Goreham-Voss, Thomas D Brown.   

Abstract

Piezoresistive array pressure sensors are widely used in orthopaedic research to determine contact stress distributions across articular joint surfaces. Experience with such sensors has shown there can be inaccuracies in how the sensor perceives applied load, depending on the material stiffnesses between which it is compressed experimentally, versus in calibration. A study was undertaken to quantify the relationship between load perception of one such sensor design (Tekscan) and the stiffness of the materials between which it is compressed. A three-dimensional finite element model of a 3x3 sensel portion of the sensing matrix was formulated, along with a layer of compression test material on each side of the sensor. The elastic modulus of the test material was varied across the range representative of cartilage (12 MPa) to hard plastic (10 GPa). Using the computed contact pressure results between contacting surfaces of the sensor layers, the percentage of load passing through the active conductor intersections was determined. The results revealed that with increase of the elastic modulus of the material between which the sensor was compressed, the percentage of load on the active conductor intersections increased monotonically. The highest sensitivity of perceived loading to test material modulus (0.1%/MPa) was seen at the low end of the modulus range. The more compliant the test material, the more the sensor layers conformed around each other's geometric incongruities, the larger the true contact areas, and the higher the fraction of the total load that passed through the intermediate (non-sensing) regions between the conductors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19742084      PMCID: PMC2723691     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Orthop J        ISSN: 1541-5457


  5 in total

1.  Contribution of articular surface geometry to ankle stabilization.

Authors:  Yuki Tochigi; M James Rudert; Charles L Saltzman; Annunziato Amendola; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Altered mechanics of cartilage with osteoarthritis: human osteoarthritis and an experimental model of joint degeneration.

Authors:  L A Setton; D M Elliott; V C Mow
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.576

3.  The relationship of the compressive modulus of articular cartilage with its deformation response to cyclic loading: does cartilage optimize its modulus so as to minimize the strains arising in it due to the prevalent loading regime?

Authors:  M K Barker; B B Seedhom
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.580

4.  Determination of Poisson's ratio of articular cartilage by indentation using different-sized indenters.

Authors:  Hui Jin; Jack L Lewis
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Effects of a contoured articular prosthetic device on tibiofemoral peak contact pressure: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Christoph Becher; Roland Huber; Hajo Thermann; Hans H Paessler; Gobert Skrbensky
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 4.342

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Traveling-load calibration of grid-array transient contact stress sensors.

Authors:  Lu Kang; Thomas E Baer; M James Rudert; Douglas R Pedersen; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  A new sensor for measurement of dynamic contact stress in the hip.

Authors:  M J Rudert; B J Ellis; C R Henak; N J Stroud; D R Pederson; J A Weiss; T D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Influence of Errors in Tactile Sensors on Some High Level Parameters Used for Manipulation with Robotic Hands.

Authors:  José A Sánchez-Durán; José A Hidalgo-López; Julián Castellanos-Ramos; Óscar Oballe-Peinado; Fernando Vidal-Verdú
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Insights into the Mechanical Behaviour of a Layered Flexible Tactile Sensor.

Authors:  Julián Castellanos-Ramos; Rafael Navas-González; Iván Fernández; Fernando Vidal-Verdú
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.