Literature DB >> 24719176

Implant-abutment connections: influence of the design on the microgap and their fatigue and fracture behavior of dental implants.

F J Gil1, M Herrero-Climent, P Lázaro, J V Rios.   

Abstract

Microgap between implant and abutment can produce biological and mechanical problems such as peri-implantitis and/or fatigue failures. The aim of this study was to evaluate microgap size and fatigue behavior of external and internal connections. In both systems the torque to tighten the abutment screw of single crown abutments was 45 Ncm. Fifty implants for each connection type were studied. One subgroup (n = 5) was used by the observation and evaluation of the microgap, other (n = 5) was tested for fracture strength and the other (n = 40) was subjected to dynamic loading. The internal connection presents a lower microgap than the external ones. From fatigue results, the external hexagon interface showed superior result compared to the internal hexagon interfaces. The tolerances in the internal connections are better and favour the fatigue behavior but this factor alone is not sufficient to improve the fatigue response in relation to the external connections when the screw is subjected at the same torque. The external system presents a higher value of the area than the internal and it produces a better load distribution. Microgaps and mechanical properties are very important for the long-term behavior of the dental implants and these aspects should be known by the implantologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24719176     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-014-5211-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  17 in total

1.  Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs.

Authors:  Ameen Khraisat; Roxana Stegaroiu; Shuichi Nomura; Osamu Miyakawa
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Growth of bioactive surfaces on dental implants.

Authors:  J M Manero; J Salsench; J Nogueras; C Aparicio; A Padrós; M Balcells; F J Gil; J A Planell
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.454

3.  Stability of implant-abutment interface with a hexagon-mediated butt joint: failure mode and bending resistance.

Authors:  Ameen Khraisat
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.932

4.  In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant-abutment connections: a short communication.

Authors:  Y Maeda; T Satoh; M Sogo
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.837

5.  Cross-sectional analysis of the implant-abutment interface.

Authors:  A L Coelho; M Suzuki; S Dibart; N DA Silva; P G Coelho
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.837

6.  In vivo vertical forces on implants.

Authors:  E J Richter
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Bacterial colonization of the internal part of two-stage implants. An in vivo study.

Authors:  M Quirynen; D van Steenberghe
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.977

8.  Fluids and microbial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections.

Authors:  A Piattelli; A Scarano; M Paolantonio; B Assenza; G C Leghissa; G Di Bonaventura; G Catamo; R Piccolomini
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 9.  A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years.

Authors:  Bjarni E Pjetursson; Ken Tan; Niklaus P Lang; Urs Brägger; Matthias Egger; Marcel Zwahlen
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Comparison of the Effect of Three Abutment-implant Connections on Stress Distribution at the Internal Surface of Dental Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Saeed Raoofi; Maryam Khademi; Reza Amid; Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh; Mohammad Reza Movahhedi
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2013-08-30
View more
  12 in total

1.  Wear of Morse taper and external hexagon implant joints after abutment removal.

Authors:  Abraão M Prado; Jorge Pereira; Filipe S Silva; Bruno Henriques; Rubens M Nascimento; Cesar A M Benfatti; José López-López; Júlio C M Souza
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Comparative evaluation of the wear resistance of two different implant abutment materials after cyclic loading - An in vitro study.

Authors:  Maniamuthu Ragupathi; Vallabh Mahadevan; N S Azhagarasan; Hariharan Ramakrishnan; S Jayakrishnakumar
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2020-11-26

3.  In Vitro Study of Preload Loss in Different Implant Abutment Connection Designs.

Authors:  Ana Sofia Vinhas; Carlos Aroso; Filomena Salazar; Marta Relvas; Ana Cristina Braga; Blanca Ríos-Carrasco; Javier Gil; José Vicente Rios-Santos; Ana Fernández-Palacín; Mariano Herrero-Climent
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Reverse torque evaluation in indexed and nonindexed abutments of Morse Taper implants in a mechanical fatigue test.

Authors:  Caio Marques Martins; Elimário Venturin Ramos; Simone Kreve; Geraldo Alberto Pinheiro de Carvalho; Aline Batista Gonçalves Franco; Luís Guilherme Scavone de Macedo; Alecsandro de Moura Silva; Sérgio Candido Dias
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr

5.  Fracture and Fatigue of Titanium Narrow Dental Implants: New Trends in Order to Improve the Mechanical Response.

Authors:  Eugenio Velasco-Ortega; Antonio Flichy-Fernández; Miquel Punset; Alvaro Jiménez-Guerra; José María Manero; Javier Gil
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Comparison of CAD/CAM abutment and prefabricated abutment in Morse taper internal type implant after cyclic loading: Axial displacement, removal torque, and tensile removal force.

Authors:  Yuseung Yi; Seong-Joo Heo; Jai-Young Koak; Seong-Kyun Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 7.  Review of the Mechanical Behavior of Different Implant-Abutment Connections.

Authors:  Ana Sofia Vinhas; Carlos Aroso; Filomena Salazar; Paula López-Jarana; José Vicente Ríos-Santos; Mariano Herrero-Climent
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Influence of the CAD-CAM Systems on the Marginal Accuracy and Mechanical Properties of Dental Restorations.

Authors:  Roberto Padrós; Luís Giner; Mariano Herrero-Climent; Carlos Falcao-Costa; José-Vicente Ríos-Santos; Francisco Javier Gil
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  A Novel Approach for Assessing the Fatigue Behavior of PEEK in a Physiologically Relevant Environment.

Authors:  Mirco Peron; Jan Torgersen; Filippo Berto
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Effect of Implant Platform Connection and Abutment Material on Removal Torque and Implant Hexagon Plastic Deformation.

Authors:  Paulo Henrique de Souza Pereira; Marina Amaral; Kusai Baroudi; Rafael Pino Vitti; Mohammad Zakaria Nassani; Laís Regiane da Silva-Concílio
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2019-12-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.