Literature DB >> 15533124

A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years.

Bjarni E Pjetursson1, Ken Tan, Niklaus P Lang, Urs Brägger, Matthias Egger, Marcel Zwahlen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the 5- and 10-year survival of implant supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and to describe the incidence of biological and technical complications.
METHODS: An electronic MEDLINE search complemented by manual searching was conducted to identify prospective and retrospective cohort studies on FPDs with a mean follow-up time of at least 5 years. Patients had to have been examined clinically at the follow-up visit. Assessment of the identified studies and data abstraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Failure and complication rates were analyzed using random-effects Poisson regression models to obtain summary estimates of 5- and 10-year survival proportions.
RESULTS: The search provided 3844 titles and 560 abstracts. Full-text analysis was performed for 176 articles resulting in 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of these studies indicated an estimated survival of implants in implant-supported FPDs of 95.4% (95 percent confidence interval (95% CI): 93.9-96.5%) after 5 and 92.8% (95% CI: 90-94.8%) after 10 years. The survival rate of FPDs supported by implants was 95% (95% CI: 92.2-96.8%) after 5 and 86.7% (95% CI: 82.8-89.8%) after 10 years of function. Only 61.3% (95% CI: 55.3-66.8%) of the patients were free of any complications after 5 years. Peri-implantitis and soft tissue complications occurred in 8.6% (95% CI: 5.1-14.1%) of FPDs after 5 years. Technical complications included implant fractures, connection-related and suprastructure-related complications. The cumulative incidence of implant fractures after 5 years was 0.4% (95% CI: 0.1-1.2%). After 5 years, the cumulative incidence of connection-related complications (screw loosening or fracture) was 7.3% and 14% for suprastructure-related complications (veneer and framework fracture).
CONCLUSION: Despite a high survival of FPDs, biological and technical complications are frequent. This, in turn, means that substantial amounts of chair time have to be accepted by the clinician following the incorporation of implant-supported FPDs. More studies with follow-up times of 10 and more years are needed as only few studies have described the long-term outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15533124     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01117.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  50 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of mandibular canal visibility on cross-sectional cone-beam CT images: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Mahogany S Miles; Edwin T Parks; George J Eckert; Steven B Blanchard
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  Comparison of long-term survival of implants and endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  F C Setzer; S Kim
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Shear Bond Strength of Porcelain to a Base-Metal Compared to Zirconia Core.

Authors:  S M Abrisham; A Fallah Tafti; S Kheirkhah; M A Tavakkoli
Journal:  J Dent Biomater       Date:  2017-03

4.  Radiological evaluation of the Cresco system in combination with Osseospeed implants: a preliminary 3-year report.

Authors:  N Baldini; M DE Sanctis; M C Cagidiaco; P Balleri; F Vignoletti; C Goracci; M Ferrari
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2014-12-27

5.  In vitro biocompatibility of orthodontic miniscrews with human gingival fibroblast and SAOS-2 osteoblast cultures.

Authors:  Hannah Finke; Bernd Koos; Helge Fischer-Brandies; Martha Es-Souni
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 6.  Treatment planning the endodontic-implant interface.

Authors:  W P Saunders
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.626

7.  Implant-abutment connections: influence of the design on the microgap and their fatigue and fracture behavior of dental implants.

Authors:  F J Gil; M Herrero-Climent; P Lázaro; J V Rios
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Comparison of fracture toughness of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic cement retained implant crowns: an in vitro study.

Authors:  S Rao; R Chowdhary
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2014-01-21

9.  Relationship between sponsorship and failure rate of dental implants: a systematic approach.

Authors:  Antoine Popelut; Fabien Valet; Olivier Fromentin; Aurélie Thomas; Philippe Bouchard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The effect of Er:YAG laser irradiation on hydroxyapatite-coated implants and fluoride-modified TiO2-blasted implant surfaces: a microstructural analysis.

Authors:  Seung-Il Shin; Eun-Kwon Lee; Jeong-Hyun Kim; Ji-Hun Lee; Sun-Hee Kim; Young-Hyuk Kwon; Yeek Herr; Jong-Hyuk Chung
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.