Literature DB >> 16336913

Stability of implant-abutment interface with a hexagon-mediated butt joint: failure mode and bending resistance.

Ameen Khraisat1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical data showed that the external hexagon implant system with a gold abutment screw has reduced the problem of screw loosening or fracture. However, the behavior of the implant-abutment joint components with respect to unfavorable bending force is still unclear.
PURPOSE: This study investigated the joint instability and bending resistance of a single-tooth external hexagon implant system after lateral cyclic loading.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen implant assemblies (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) were divided equally into three groups: A, B, and C. Each assembly consisted of a Brånemark System Mk IV implant (4 x 10 mm) mounted in a brass block, a CeraOne abutment (3 mm), and an experimental cement-retained superstructure. For group A, a centric lateral cyclic load of 50 N was applied for 1.0 x 10(6), whereas for group B, the same load was eccentrically applied for 1.0 x 10(6) cycles. Group C, the control, was not loaded. After cyclic loading, specimens were mounted in a universal testing machine, and the yield and bending strengths were measured (kg). The external hexagon surface texture was examined using a secondary electron microscope. The data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and compared by the Tukey test (alpha = .05).
RESULTS: For all test specimens, the abutment screw was plastically bent in the unthreaded portion. Group B had a significantly lower mean yield and bending strengths than group C (p = .005 and .010, respectively). Post-cyclic loading photographs showed that group B implants had marked burnishing around the hexagon corners. The bending force abraded both corner areas of the hexagon surface but left the middle area nearly intact for all tested groups. However, group B had the significantly lowest mean abraded area.
CONCLUSION: Within the limits of this study, eccentric rather than centric lateral cyclic loading negatively affected the resistance of the implant-abutment joint to static bending.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16336913     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00067.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  3 in total

1.  Implant-abutment connections: influence of the design on the microgap and their fatigue and fracture behavior of dental implants.

Authors:  F J Gil; M Herrero-Climent; P Lázaro; J V Rios
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Influence of the connection design and titanium grades of the implant complex on resistance under static loading.

Authors:  Su-Jung Park; Suk-Won Lee; Richard Leesungbok; Su-Jin Ahn
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Noninvasive method for retrieval of broken dental implant abutment screw.

Authors:  Jagadish Reddy Gooty; Sunil Kumar Palakuru; Vikram Reddy Guntakalla; Mahipal Nera
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2014-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.