Literature DB >> 17559619

Cross-sectional analysis of the implant-abutment interface.

A L Coelho1, M Suzuki, S Dibart, N DA Silva, P G Coelho.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a technique to evaluate the implant-abutment gap of an external hexagon implant system as a function of radius. Six implants of 3.75 mm in diameter (Conexao Sistema de Protese Ltda, Sao Paulo, Brazil) and their respective abutments were screw connected and torqued to 20 N cm(-1). The implants were mounted in epoxy assuring an implant long-axis position perpendicular to the vertical axis. Each implant was grounded through its thickness parallel to implant long-axis at six different distance interval. Implant-abutment gap distances were recorded along the implant-abutment region for each section. Individual measurements were related to their radial position through trigonometric inferences. A sixth degree polynomial line fit approach determined radial adaptation patterns for each implant. Micrographs along implant sections showed a approximately 300 mum length implant-abutment engagement region. All implants presented communication between external and internal regions through connection gaps and inaccurate implant-abutment alignment. Average gap distances were not significantly different between implants (P > 0.086). Polynomial lines showed implant-abutment gap values below 10 mum from 0 mum to approximately 250 mum of the implant-abutment engagement region. Gap distances significantly increased from approximately 250 mum to the outer radius of the implant-abutment engagement region. The technique described provided a broader scenario of the implant-abutment gap adaptation compared with previous work concerning implant-abutment gap determination, and should be considered for better understanding mechanical aspects or biological effects of implant-abutment adaptation on peri-implant tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17559619     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01714.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  9 in total

1.  In vitro synchrotron-based radiography of micro-gap formation at the implant-abutment interface of two-piece dental implants.

Authors:  A Rack; T Rack; M Stiller; H Riesemeier; S Zabler; K Nelson
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 2.616

2.  A single dose of zoledronic acid reverses the deleterious effects of glucocorticoids on titanium implant osseointegration.

Authors:  J S B Carvas; R M R Pereira; V F Caparbo; P Fuller; C A Silveira; L A P Lima; E Bonfa; S B V Mello
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Implant-abutment connections: influence of the design on the microgap and their fatigue and fracture behavior of dental implants.

Authors:  F J Gil; M Herrero-Climent; P Lázaro; J V Rios
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Sealing Capability and SEM Observation of the Implant-Abutment Interface.

Authors:  Fabio C Lorenzoni; Paulo G Coelho; Gerson Bonfante; Ricardo M Carvalho; Nelson R F A Silva; Marcelo Suzuki; Thelma Lopes Silva; Estevam A Bonfante
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2011-07-02

5.  A comparative study of gold UCLA-type and CAD/CAM titanium implant abutments.

Authors:  Ji-Man Park; Jai-Bong Lee; Seong-Joo Heo; Eun-Jin Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Leakage evaluation of original and compatible implant-abutment connections: In vitro study using Rhodamine B.

Authors:  Antoine Berberi; George Tehini; Khaldoun Rifai; Farah Bou Nasser Eddine; Bassam Badran; Haidar Akl
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2014-08-11

7.  A Comparative 3D Finite Element Computational Study of Three Connections.

Authors:  Davide Farronato; Mattia Manfredini; Andrea Stevanello; Veronica Campana; Lorenzo Azzi; Marco Farronato
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Comparison of CAD/CAM abutment and prefabricated abutment in Morse taper internal type implant after cyclic loading: Axial displacement, removal torque, and tensile removal force.

Authors:  Yuseung Yi; Seong-Joo Heo; Jai-Young Koak; Seong-Kyun Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  Comparison of Mechanical Resistance to Maximal Torsion Stress in Original and Nonoriginal or Compatible Prosthetic Implant Screws: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  António Sérgio Silva; José Manuel Mendes; Tiago Araújo; Carlos Aroso; Pedro Barreiros
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-12-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.