Literature DB >> 24711409

Natural auditory scene statistics shapes human spatial hearing.

Cesare V Parise1, Katharina Knorre, Marc O Ernst.   

Abstract

Human perception, cognition, and action are laced with seemingly arbitrary mappings. In particular, sound has a strong spatial connotation: Sounds are high and low, melodies rise and fall, and pitch systematically biases perceived sound elevation. The origins of such mappings are unknown. Are they the result of physiological constraints, do they reflect natural environmental statistics, or are they truly arbitrary? We recorded natural sounds from the environment, analyzed the elevation-dependent filtering of the outer ear, and measured frequency-dependent biases in human sound localization. We find that auditory scene statistics reveals a clear mapping between frequency and elevation. Perhaps more interestingly, this natural statistical mapping is tightly mirrored in both ear-filtering properties and in perceived sound location. This suggests that both sound localization behavior and ear anatomy are fine-tuned to the statistics of natural auditory scenes, likely providing the basis for the spatial connotation of human hearing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian modeling; cross-modal correspondence; frequency–elevation mapping; head-related transfer function

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24711409      PMCID: PMC4000839          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1322705111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  24 in total

1.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts.

Authors:  Yair Weiss; Eero P Simoncelli; Edward H Adelson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Optimal defocus estimation in individual natural images.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Natural, metaphoric, and linguistic auditory direction signals have distinct influences on visual motion processing.

Authors:  Sepideh Sadaghiani; Joost X Maier; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Changes in auditory frequency guide visual-spatial attention.

Authors:  Julia A Mossbridge; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-07-08

5.  Cross-modality correspondence between pitch and spatial location modulates attentional orienting.

Authors:  Rocco Chiou; Anina N Rich
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Natural cross-modal mappings between visual and auditory features.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Anne Treisman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  When correlation implies causation in multisensory integration.

Authors:  Cesare V Parise; Charles Spence; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  The thickness of musical pitch: psychophysical evidence for linguistic relativity.

Authors:  Sarah Dolscheid; Shakila Shayan; Asifa Majid; Daniel Casasanto
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-03-28

9.  Illusory movement of stationary stimuli in the visual periphery: evidence for a strong centrifugal prior in motion processing.

Authors:  Ruyuan Zhang; Oh-Sang Kwon; Duje Tadin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Cardinal rules: visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics.

Authors:  Ahna R Girshick; Michael S Landy; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  46 in total

1.  Statistics of natural reverberation enable perceptual separation of sound and space.

Authors:  James Traer; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Differential coding of perception in the world's languages.

Authors:  Asifa Majid; Seán G Roberts; Ludy Cilissen; Karen Emmorey; Brenda Nicodemus; Lucinda O'Grady; Bencie Woll; Barbara LeLan; Hilário de Sousa; Brian L Cansler; Shakila Shayan; Connie de Vos; Gunter Senft; N J Enfield; Rogayah A Razak; Sebastian Fedden; Sylvia Tufvesson; Mark Dingemanse; Ozge Ozturk; Penelope Brown; Clair Hill; Olivier Le Guen; Vincent Hirtzel; Rik van Gijn; Mark A Sicoli; Stephen C Levinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Internalized elevation perception of simple stimuli in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Tanvi Thakkar; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Drawing sounds: representing tones and chords spatially.

Authors:  Alejandro Salgado-Montejo; Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos; Jorge A Alvarado; Juan Camilo Arboleda; Daniel R Suarez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Are crossmodal correspondences relative or absolute? Sequential effects on speeded classification.

Authors:  Riccardo Brunetti; Allegra Indraccolo; Claudia Del Gatto; Charles Spence; Valerio Santangelo
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Modulation frequency as a cue for auditory speed perception.

Authors:  Irene Senna; Cesare V Parise; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Do synaesthesia and mental imagery tap into similar cross-modal processes?

Authors:  Alan O'Dowd; Sarah M Cooney; David P McGovern; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Synthesis of Hemispheric ITD Tuning from the Readout of a Neural Map: Commonalities of Proposed Coding Schemes in Birds and Mammals.

Authors:  Jose L Peña; Fanny Cazettes; Michael V Beckert; Brian J Fischer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Naturally together: pitch-height and brightness as coupled factors for eliciting the SMARC effect in non-musicians.

Authors:  Marco Pitteri; Mauro Marchetti; Konstantinos Priftis; Massimo Grassi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-09-30

10.  Tactile length contraction as Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Jonathan Tong; Vy Ngo; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.