Literature DB >> 19458220

Natural, metaphoric, and linguistic auditory direction signals have distinct influences on visual motion processing.

Sepideh Sadaghiani1, Joost X Maier, Uta Noppeney.   

Abstract

To interact with our dynamic environment, the brain merges motion information from auditory and visual senses. However, not only "natural" auditory MOTION, but also "metaphoric" de/ascending PITCH and SPEECH (e.g., "left/right"), influence the visual motion percept. Here, we systematically investigate whether these three classes of direction signals influence visual motion perception through shared or distinct neural mechanisms. In a visual-selective attention paradigm, subjects discriminated the direction of visual motion at several levels of reliability, with an irrelevant auditory stimulus being congruent, absent, or incongruent. Although the natural, metaphoric, and linguistic auditory signals were equally long and adjusted to induce a comparable directional bias on the motion percept, they influenced visual motion processing at different levels of the cortical hierarchy. A significant audiovisual interaction was revealed for MOTION in left human motion complex (hMT+/V5+) and for SPEECH in right intraparietal sulcus. In fact, the audiovisual interaction gradually decreased in left hMT+/V5+ for MOTION > PITCH > SPEECH and in right intraparietal sulcus for SPEECH > PITCH > MOTION. In conclusion, natural motion signals are integrated in audiovisual motion areas, whereas the influence of culturally learnt signals emerges primarily in higher-level convergence regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19458220      PMCID: PMC6665909          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5437-08.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  37 in total

1.  Perceptual decisions formed by accumulation of audiovisual evidence in prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Uta Noppeney; Dirk Ostwald; Sebastian Werner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Sensitive period for a multimodal response in human visual motion area MT/MST.

Authors:  Marina Bedny; Talia Konkle; Kevin Pelphrey; Rebecca Saxe; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Effect of pitch-space correspondence on sound-induced visual motion perception.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Wataru Teramoto; Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Typical neural representations of action verbs develop without vision.

Authors:  M Bedny; A Caramazza; A Pascual-Leone; R Saxe
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 5.  Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: odors, musical notes, and geometrical shapes.

Authors:  Ophelia Deroy; Anne-Sylvie Crisinel; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

Review 6.  Why we are not all synesthetes (not even weakly so).

Authors:  Ophelia Deroy; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

7.  Sensory and striatal areas integrate auditory and visual signals into behavioral benefits during motion discrimination.

Authors:  Sebastian von Saldern; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Causal Inference in Audiovisual Perception.

Authors:  Agoston Mihalik; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  The Influence of Auditory Cues on Bodily and Movement Perception.

Authors:  Tasha R Stanton; Charles Spence
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-17

10.  Functional Characterization of the Cingulo-Opercular Network in the Maintenance of Tonic Alertness.

Authors:  Sepideh Sadaghiani; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.