Literature DB >> 22808586

Cross-modality correspondence between pitch and spatial location modulates attentional orienting.

Rocco Chiou1, Anina N Rich.   

Abstract

The brain constantly integrates incoming signals across the senses to form a cohesive view of the world. Most studies on multisensory integration concern the roles of spatial and temporal parameters. However, recent findings suggest cross-modal correspondences (eg high-pitched sounds associated with bright, small objects located high up) also affect multisensory integration. Here, we focus on the association between auditory pitch and spatial location. Surprisingly little is known about the cognitive and perceptual roots of this phenomenon, despite its long use in ergonomic design. In a series of experiments, we explore how this cross-modal mapping affects the allocation of attention with an attentional cuing paradigm. Our results demonstrate that high and low tones induce attention shifts to upper or lower locations, depending on pitch height. Furthermore, this pitch-induced cuing effect is susceptible to contextual manipulations and volitional control. These findings suggest the cross-modal interaction between pitch and location originates from an attentional level rather than from response mapping alone. The flexible contextual mapping between pitch and location, as well as its susceptibility to top-down control, suggests the pitch-induced cuing effect is primarily mediated by cognitive processes after initial sensory encoding and occurs at a relatively late stage of voluntary attention orienting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22808586     DOI: 10.1068/p7161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  17 in total

1.  Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: a study using the implicit association test.

Authors:  Cesare V Parise; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effect of pitch-space correspondence on sound-induced visual motion perception.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Wataru Teramoto; Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: odors, musical notes, and geometrical shapes.

Authors:  Ophelia Deroy; Anne-Sylvie Crisinel; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

4.  Are crossmodal correspondences relative or absolute? Sequential effects on speeded classification.

Authors:  Riccardo Brunetti; Allegra Indraccolo; Claudia Del Gatto; Charles Spence; Valerio Santangelo
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Natural auditory scene statistics shapes human spatial hearing.

Authors:  Cesare V Parise; Katharina Knorre; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The role of conceptual knowledge in understanding synaesthesia: Evaluating contemporary findings from a "hub-and-spokes" perspective.

Authors:  Rocco Chiou; Anina N Rich
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-19

7.  Musicians are more consistent: Gestural cross-modal mappings of pitch, loudness and tempo in real-time.

Authors:  Mats B Küssner; Dan Tidhar; Helen M Prior; Daniel Leech-Wilkinson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-28

8.  Crossmodal interactions during affective picture processing.

Authors:  Vera Ferrari; Serena Mastria; Nicola Bruno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Audiovisual correspondence between musical timbre and visual shapes.

Authors:  Mohammad Adeli; Jean Rouat; Stéphane Molotchnikoff
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Eye Movements during Auditory Attention Predict Individual Differences in Dorsal Attention Network Activity.

Authors:  Rodrigo M Braga; Richard Z Fu; Barry M Seemungal; Richard J S Wise; Robert Leech
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.