Literature DB >> 28701558

Modulation frequency as a cue for auditory speed perception.

Irene Senna1, Cesare V Parise2,3, Marc O Ernst4.   

Abstract

Unlike vision, the mechanisms underlying auditory motion perception are poorly understood. Here we describe an auditory motion illusion revealing a novel cue to auditory speed perception: the temporal frequency of amplitude modulation (AM-frequency), typical for rattling sounds. Naturally, corrugated objects sliding across each other generate rattling sounds whose AM-frequency tends to directly correlate with speed. We found that AM-frequency modulates auditory speed perception in a highly systematic fashion: moving sounds with higher AM-frequency are perceived as moving faster than sounds with lower AM-frequency. Even more interestingly, sounds with higher AM-frequency also induce stronger motion aftereffects. This reveals the existence of specialized neural mechanisms for auditory motion perception, which are sensitive to AM-frequency. Thus, in spatial hearing, the brain successfully capitalizes on the AM-frequency of rattling sounds to estimate the speed of moving objects. This tightly parallels previous findings in motion vision, where spatio-temporal frequency of moving displays systematically affects both speed perception and the magnitude of the motion aftereffects. Such an analogy with vision suggests that motion detection may rely on canonical computations, with similar neural mechanisms shared across the different modalities.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  aftereffects; auditory perception; canonical computations; motion; speed

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28701558      PMCID: PMC5524496          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  28 in total

1.  The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

2.  Discrimination of sound source velocity in human listeners.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cross-modal integration of auditory and visual motion signals.

Authors:  G F Meyer; S M Wuerger
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-08-08       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts.

Authors:  Yair Weiss; Eero P Simoncelli; Edward H Adelson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  The auditory motion aftereffect: its tuning and specificity in the spatial and frequency domains.

Authors:  C J Dong; N V Swindale; P Zakarauskas; V Hayward; M S Cynader
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-07

Review 6.  Vision and the statistics of the visual environment.

Authors:  Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  The effect of trajectory on the auditory motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Michael F Neelon; Rick L Jenison
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Experience can change the 'light-from-above' prior.

Authors:  Wendy J Adams; Erich W Graf; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Demonstration of cue recruitment: change in visual appearance by means of Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Qi Haijiang; Jeffrey A Saunders; Rebecca W Stone; Benjamin T Backus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The spatial frequency effect on perceived velocity.

Authors:  H C Diener; E R Wist; J Dichgans; T Brandt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  1 in total

1.  Auditory motion perception emerges from successive sound localizations integrated over time.

Authors:  Vincent Roggerone; Jonathan Vacher; Cynthia Tarlao; Catherine Guastavino
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.