Literature DB >> 21930897

Optimal defocus estimation in individual natural images.

Johannes Burge1, Wilson S Geisler.   

Abstract

Defocus blur is nearly always present in natural images: Objects at only one distance can be perfectly focused. Images of objects at other distances are blurred by an amount depending on pupil diameter and lens properties. Despite the fact that defocus is of great behavioral, perceptual, and biological importance, it is unknown how biological systems estimate defocus. Given a set of natural scenes and the properties of the vision system, we show from first principles how to optimally estimate defocus at each location in any individual image. We show for the human visual system that high-precision, unbiased estimates are obtainable under natural viewing conditions for patches with detectable contrast. The high quality of the estimates is surprising given the heterogeneity of natural images. Additionally, we quantify the degree to which the sign ambiguity often attributed to defocus is resolved by monochromatic aberrations (other than defocus) and chromatic aberrations; chromatic aberrations fully resolve the sign ambiguity. Finally, we show that simple spatial and spatio-chromatic receptive fields extract the information optimally. The approach can be tailored to any environment-vision system pairing: natural or man-made, animal or machine. Thus, it provides a principled general framework for analyzing the psychophysics and neurophysiology of defocus estimation in species across the animal kingdom and for developing optimal image-based defocus and depth estimation algorithms for computational vision systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21930897      PMCID: PMC3189032          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1108491108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  27 in total

1.  Matrix method to find a new set of Zernike coefficients from an original set when the aperture radius is changed.

Authors:  Charles E Campbell
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 2.  Homeostasis of eye growth and the question of myopia.

Authors:  Josh Wallman; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  A neural and computational model for the chromatic control of accommodation.

Authors:  D I Flitcroft
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.241

4.  Retinal blur and the perception of egocentric distance.

Authors:  Dhanraj Vishwanath; Erik Blaser
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Accommodation to multiple-focal-plane displays: Implications for improving stereoscopic displays and for accommodation control.

Authors:  Kevin J MacKenzie; David M Hoffman; Simon J Watt
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  A new sense for depth of field.

Authors:  A P Pentland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 6.226

7.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex.

Authors:  D H Hubel; T N Wiesel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Chromatic and wavefront aberrations: L-, M- and S-cone stimulation with typical and extreme retinal image quality.

Authors:  Florent Autrusseau; Larry Thibos; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Stimulus requirements for the decoding of myopic and hyperopic defocus under single and competing defocus conditions in the chicken.

Authors:  Sigrid Diether; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Accommodation and color.

Authors:  W N Charman; J Tucker
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1978-04
View more
  43 in total

1.  A Bayesian observer model constrained by efficient coding can explain 'anti-Bayesian' percepts.

Authors:  Xue-Xin Wei; Alan A Stocker
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Defocus blur discrimination in natural images with natural optics.

Authors:  Stephen Sebastian; Johannes Burge; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Binocular integration and disparity selectivity in mouse primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Benjamin Scholl; Johannes Burge; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Creating correct blur and its effect on accommodation.

Authors:  Steven A Cholewiak; Gordon D Love; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Optimal disparity estimation in natural stereo images.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Predicting the Partition of Behavioral Variability in Speed Perception with Naturalistic Stimuli.

Authors:  Benjamin M Chin; Johannes Burge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Pattern Adaptation and Normalization Reweighting.

Authors:  Zachary M Westrick; David J Heeger; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  On the number of perceivable blur levels in naturalistic images.

Authors:  Christopher Patrick Taylor; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Circuit Mechanisms of a Retinal Ganglion Cell with Stimulus-Dependent Response Latency and Activation Beyond Its Dendrites.

Authors:  Adam Mani; Gregory W Schwartz
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Neural Mechanisms of Attentional Control for Objects: Decoding EEG Alpha When Anticipating Faces, Scenes,and Tools.

Authors:  Sean Noah; Travis Powell; Natalia Khodayari; Diana Olivan; Mingzhou Ding; George R Mangun
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.