Literature DB >> 21741633

Changes in auditory frequency guide visual-spatial attention.

Julia A Mossbridge1, Marcia Grabowecky, Satoru Suzuki.   

Abstract

How do the characteristics of sounds influence the allocation of visual-spatial attention? Natural sounds typically change in frequency. Here we demonstrate that the direction of frequency change guides visual-spatial attention more strongly than the average or ending frequency, and provide evidence suggesting that this cross-modal effect may be mediated by perceptual experience. We used a Go/No-Go color-matching task to avoid response compatibility confounds. Participants performed the task either with their heads upright or tilted by 90°, misaligning the head-centered and environmental axes. The first of two colored circles was presented at fixation and the second was presented in one of four surrounding positions in a cardinal or diagonal direction. Either an ascending or descending auditory-frequency sweep was presented coincident with the first circle. Participants were instructed to respond to the color match between the two circles and to ignore the uninformative sounds. Ascending frequency sweeps facilitated performance (response time and/or sensitivity) when the second circle was presented at the cardinal top position and descending sweeps facilitated performance when the second circle was presented at the cardinal bottom position; there were no effects of the average or ending frequency. The sweeps had no effects when circles were presented at diagonal locations, and head tilt entirely eliminated the effect. Thus, visual-spatial cueing by pitch change is narrowly tuned to vertical directions and dominates any effect of average or ending frequency. Because this cross-modal cueing is dependent on the alignment of head-centered and environmental axes, it may develop through associative learning during waking upright experience.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21741633      PMCID: PMC3149771          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  23 in total

1.  From symbols to sounds: visual symbolic information activates sound representations.

Authors:  Andreas Widmann; Teija Kujala; Mari Tervaniemi; Anu Kujala; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Changing pitch induced visual motion illusion.

Authors:  Fumiko Maeda; Ryota Kanai; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Binding symbols and sounds: evidence from event-related oscillatory gamma-band activity.

Authors:  Andreas Widmann; Thomas Gruber; Teija Kujala; Mari Tervaniemi; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  The glissando illusion and handedness.

Authors:  Diana Deutsch; Kamil Hamaoui; Trevor Henthorn
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 6.  The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration.

Authors:  Durk Talsma; Daniel Senkowski; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  On cross-modal similarity: auditory-visual interactions in speeded discrimination.

Authors:  L E Marks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Effects of some variations in auditory input upon visual choice reaction time.

Authors:  I H Bernstein; B A Edelstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-02

9.  Natural cross-modal mappings between visual and auditory features.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Anne Treisman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Characteristic sounds make you look at target objects more quickly.

Authors:  Lucica Iordanescu; Marcia Grabowecky; Steven Franconeri; Jan Theeuwes; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  15 in total

1.  Effect of pitch-space correspondence on sound-induced visual motion perception.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Wataru Teramoto; Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Why we are not all synesthetes (not even weakly so).

Authors:  Ophelia Deroy; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

3.  Natural auditory scene statistics shapes human spatial hearing.

Authors:  Cesare V Parise; Katharina Knorre; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Reaching for the high note: judgments of auditory pitch are affected by kinesthetic position.

Authors:  Autumn B Hostetter; Christina M Dandar; Gabrielle Shimko; Colin Grogan
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-08-21

5.  Haptic-payment: Exploring vibration feedback as a means of reducing overspending in mobile payment.

Authors:  Muhanad Shakir Manshad; Daniel Brannon
Journal:  J Bus Res       Date:  2020-09-11

6.  Auditory rhythms are systemically associated with spatial-frequency and density information in visual scenes.

Authors:  Aleksandra Sherman; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

7.  Rapid volitional control of apparent motion during percept generation.

Authors:  Julia A Mossbridge; Laura Ortega; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Direction of Auditory Pitch-Change Influences Visual Search for Slope From Graphs.

Authors:  Stacey Parrott; Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Laura Orte; Marcia Grabowecky; Mark D Huntington; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Musicians are more consistent: Gestural cross-modal mappings of pitch, loudness and tempo in real-time.

Authors:  Mats B Küssner; Dan Tidhar; Helen M Prior; Daniel Leech-Wilkinson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-28

10.  Contingent sounds change the mental representation of one's finger length.

Authors:  Ana Tajadura-Jiménez; Maria Vakali; Merle T Fairhurst; Alisa Mandrigin; Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze; Ophelia Deroy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.